yurimodin

They can technically do as much or as little as they want......it is called Supreme after all.

They don't even need a district split, they CAN butt in on an interlocutory basis but they seem to always decide not to for some unknown imaginary reasons?

It already has been found unconstitutional. If Bruen says you have the RIGHT to carry a handgun outside the home for self defense then it should go without saying that you have the RIGHT to own/carry one in your own home.

Total scum but the "law" is unconstitutional and she has the right to keep and bear.

Dealers already have to do this.....otherwise welder, 3d printer, drill press goes brrrrrrt. Also no text history or tradition of FFL's or 4473's during the founding era.

TLDR?

Meanwhile SCOTUS

Don't hold your breath, I am still waiting on Eric Holder to comply with the congressional inquiry on Fast n Furious..

What date is it this year?.......I should go with a giant sign that says "Free People Don't Register" or "I did not comply"

RIP James Yeager (he had cancer or ALS etc)

That's (D)ifferent

the proper response

Don't ask don't tell

what a crock.......besides full auto pistols should not be illegal anyway.