transplant Posted April 13, 2016 at 05:53 AM Share Posted April 13, 2016 at 05:53 AM Someone should tell him about the PLCAA. Punish the criminals, not the people who followed the law and didn't know or have reason to know something was wrong. http://www.jta.org/2016/04/12/news-opinion/united-states/husband-of-kansas-city-shootings-victim-sues-gun-sellershttp://sellingthesecondamendment.com/walmart-sued-white-supremacist-buying-gun/ https://www.scribd.com/doc/308202124/lamanno-suit-1-pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C0untZer0 Posted April 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM Share Posted April 13, 2016 at 11:02 AM Walmart ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bo69 Posted April 13, 2016 at 12:12 PM Share Posted April 13, 2016 at 12:12 PM I should sue GM for the drunk ILLEGAL immigrant that ran my mother over and killed her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake8267 Posted April 13, 2016 at 02:18 PM Share Posted April 13, 2016 at 02:18 PM I should sue GM for the drunk ILLEGAL immigrant that ran my mother over and killed her. I actually think this should be the approach we take to get lawsuits like this prohibited. The technology exists to significantly reduce instances of drunk driving as well as traveling at rates of speed well over the posted limit. If the NRA and other gun rights groups were to start sponsoring lawsuits against vehicle manufacturers following deaths due to drunk driving or speeding/exhibition of speed we'd quickly see laws in place to prevent these lawsuits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinnyb82 Posted April 15, 2016 at 05:14 PM Share Posted April 15, 2016 at 05:14 PM Ironically the government shielded GM from any and all liability arising from design/manufacturing defects in all of their pre-bankruptcy vehicles (first time ever a corporation hasn't had to funnel cash into a contingency fund for payouts), thus shielding GM from pretty much any legal action arising from both known and unknown defects, yet the government would love to repeal the PLCAA and make firearm manufacturers liable for how CUSTOMERS use their products. GM can conceal fatal design defects and get away scot free but firearms manufacturers should have strict liability. Makes sense....nope. Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.