Jump to content

Questions about SB-1657


JDW

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon folks,

 

These will be a dumb questions for those of you who've been heavily involved in and followed the Springfield process. I'll ask anyway, because the answer(s) will be you teaching me something new. :)

 

 

If, SB-1657 passes the house, how soon does it go to the governor?

 

If the governor were to veto it, would that veto stand?

 

If the governor were to sign it, how soon does it become law?

 

Lastly, like in today's session, when it gets taken off the table, does that essentially mean they don't have the needed votes to pass it, or could it possibly mean they're going to let it die?

 

Thanks very much for your answer's in advance. Figure if I'm this heavily involved in the process, I should probably have a clue as to how the system works.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once a bill passes both houses then legislature has 30 days to send to governor. He then has 60 days to sign or veto or it becomes law. He signs it's effective immediately or the date specified in bill. A veto option is an amendment veto where he changes the bill. After veto it would need to go back to both houses for a veto override which requires more votes than bill passage did, at least during spring session. SB1657 passed with minimum 30 votes so don't know likelihood of getting 36 for an override.

 

I'll let someone else address nuances of a tabled bill vs one taken out of the record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I crazy, or did the legislative session end yesterday? Doesn't that mean that starting today we're in a "Veto Session" or something like that? Don't all bills now need a larger majority to pass, thus the dealer licensing bill as of today needs greater than a simple majority? Is that the same amount or still less than is needed for a veto override?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

There are no dumb questions.

 

OK then, what does "out of the record" mean?

 

Basically removed from being voted on.

 

The Illinois House uses their own version of parliamentary rules, as most legislative bodies do, and they basically removed it from the agenda until a possible later date.

 

 

Thank you. So is there some significance to a bill not being on the agenda for several sessions before this, having it be on the agenda today, and then being taken out of record?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any legislative measure is normally made part of "The Record." I believe that technically, it means that the bill will not be considered or acted upon, hence it will not be part of the record. A sponsor will sometimes pull a bill to do some more work on it, or pull it from the record to garner more votes. When a bill is out of the record, it cannot be voted on...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it possible for bill to be out of record and put back in the same day, so just because it gets passed on earlier in day it can reappear?

 

BTW, override votes or bill pass votes after 5/31 are 36 in Senate and 71 in House.

Ooh real inside baseball question!

 

I do not know what their rules allow. Generally Demeter's, Robert's, SImplied Guide to Parlimentary procedure, etc. If you pull something off the "table" (record, agenda, for consideration, etc.) it cannot come back on until the next session. Session is a term that also is defined per rules of order. So really I don't know. But I doubt it would come back on the same day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Isn't it possible for bill to be out of record and put back in the same day, so just because it gets passed on earlier in day it can reappear?

 

BTW, override votes or bill pass votes after 5/31 are 36 in Senate and 71 in House.

Ooh real inside baseball question!

 

I do not know what their rules allow. Generally Demeter's, Robert's, SImplied Guide to Parlimentary procedure, etc. If you pull something off the "table" (record, agenda, for consideration, etc.) it cannot come back on until the next session. Session is a term that also is defined per rules of order. So really I don't know. But I doubt it would come back on the same day.

 

Taking a bill from the table, by Illinois rules, requires a 3/5 vote (pretty sure it's 3/5) and would have to occur within the same 2 year General Assembly in which the bill was tabled in the first place.

 

That's different than not having it read into the legislative record (ie "out of the record").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

This is good but doesn't include dates, vote counts needed, etc.

 

Haven't found a single document with all that. I've googled how a bill becomes law in Illinois and cobbled together my understanding from posts here and online multiple sources as some results are topic specific and not comprehensive e.g pensions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

This is good but doesn't include dates, vote counts needed, etc.

Haven't found a single document with all that. I've googled how a bill becomes law in Illinois and cobbled together my understanding from posts here and online multiple sources as some results are topic specific and not comprehensive e.g pensions.

That's what I'm doing now as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've looked briefly but never found their exact rules when I discovered there appeared to be no formal out of record in Robert's rules of order.

The closest that 'Out of Record" would be in Robert's is "lay on the table"

 

http://www.rulesonline.com/rror-05.htm

 

As I said earlier, the legislative body in Illinois, like in other states, uses their own rules of order. This is a very common thing for formal deliberative bodies to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...