Jump to content


Photo

Johnson vs ISP - IL Supreme Court Rules 7-0 Win for Johnson


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#31 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,897 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 04 February 2020 - 04:55 PM

She filed the lawsuit herself and after a few years in it became complicated and needed legal help.


"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#32 mab22

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 684 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 18

Posted 05 February 2020 - 10:45 PM

So who stepped in to assist when it became complicated?


Void the FOID!

#33 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,897 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 05 February 2020 - 11:00 PM

We were in contact with David Jensen through working with him on Moore vs Madigan. When we discussed what was going on with Shawna's case, he said he was intetested in taking a look at it.
"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#34 Jwolf

  • Members
  • 7 posts
  • Joined: 28-December 19

Posted 09 February 2020 - 02:46 PM

Does this mean the questions concerning misdemeanor domestic violence convictions will be removed from the FOID/CCL applications? Will this have any effect on the ATF 4473 form? How can they do this without repealing the Lautenberg amendment? 



#35 Flynn

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,201 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 18

Posted 09 February 2020 - 03:57 PM

Does this mean the questions concerning misdemeanor domestic violence convictions will be removed from the FOID/CCL applications? Will this have any effect on the ATF 4473 form? How can they do this without repealing the Lautenberg amendment? 

 

The issue here is that it was charged as domestic but eventually plead down to simple (non-domestic) battery to avoid the domestic conviction.


Edited by Flynn, 09 February 2020 - 03:58 PM.

Anonymous leakers, leak anonymously about the anonymous leak.
 
—Anonymous

#36 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,897 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 09 February 2020 - 05:26 PM

Another issue is that the Illinois Supreme Court has recognized the whole civil rights restored does indeed include the right to keep and bear arms. Federal laws/courts recognizes civil rights can be restored by the states. Now Illinois should have a recognized means of restoring civil rights after a domestic misdemeanor conviction.
"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams

#37 Molly B.

    IllinoisCarry spokesperson

  • Moderator
  • 16,897 posts
  • Joined: 18-April 05

Posted 09 February 2020 - 05:42 PM

Does this mean the questions concerning misdemeanor domestic violence convictions will be removed from the FOID/CCL applications? Will this have any effect on the ATF 4473 form? How can they do this without repealing the Lautenberg amendment?

I don't believe it will be entirely stricken from the application. I believe the ilga will add something similar to the others listed, "have you been convicted of a domestic misdemeanor in the past five years?"

And maybe require an appeal to ISP or circuit Court but will recognize/accept the result of the appeal.
"It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." --Samuel Adams




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users