Jump to content

Illinois General Assembly 11/15/2018


mauserme

Recommended Posts

.
The legislature was quiet yesterday, from our point of view. As is often pointed out, we are safe for another day.
I'm removing a few bills from our daily list today. Despite my good intention to avoid any surprises, my inclusion of some legislation potentially on concurrence has, instead, caused confusion. A bill postponed at the end of the Spring Session will also be removed, leaving a single threat in today's list. The others will still be monitored closely, of course, though less publicly.
The House is scheduled for 10:00 AM today: the Senate for 9:30 AM.
Next Days Scheduled
House: 11/27/2018
Senate: 11/27/2018
.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.


House Calendar




10:00 AM







Oppose


Senate Sponsor: Morrison, Nybo, Bush, Aquino, Link, Cunningham, Murphy, Martinez, Curran, Lightford, Jones, Castro, Koehler, Muñoz, Collins, Steans, Hunter, Rezin, McGuire (Added after Passage: Sims,Hutchinson)


House Sponsor: Mussman, Willis, Carroll, Moylan, Cassidy


Status: House/3rd Reading




Replaces everything after the enacting clause. Amends the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. Provides that the recipient of any firearm transferred by way of a Firearm Disposition Record form shall file with the Department of State Police, a sworn affidavit, attesting that the person: (1) is aware of, and will abide by the current law regarding the unlawful transfer of a firearm; (2) is aware of the penalties for violating the law as it pertains to unlawful transfer of a firearm; (3) intends to retain possession of the firearm until it is determined that the transferor is capable of possessing the firearm, or until a new person is chosen to hold the firearm; and (4) inform the Department and the State's Attorney in the county in which he or she resides of any address or name change that occurs while the person possesses the firearm; however, the person shall be relieved of these duties once he or she has legally destroyed the firearm or lawfully transferred the firearm. Provides that the person shall provide notice to the State's Attorney in the county in which he or she resides via copy of the sworn affidavit, to demonstrate that the affidavit has been filed with the Department. Makes conforming changes. Amends the Criminal Code of 2012. Provides that a person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer who does not determine the validity of a purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card commits a Class 4 felony.




Provides that any person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer and who desires to transfer or sell a firearm to any person who is not a federally licensed firearm dealer who does not comply with the provision that before selling or transferring the firearm the person must contact the Department of State Police with the transferee's or purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card number to determine the validity of the transferee's or purchaser's Firearm Owner's Identification Card shall be punished as a Class A misdemeanor under the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act (rather than non-compliance shall not be punishable as a crime or petty offense). Makes a technical change.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by mauserme, November 15, 2018 at 01:57 AM - No reason given
Hidden by mauserme, November 15, 2018 at 01:57 AM - No reason given
.

The legislature was quiet yesterday, from our point of view. As is often pointed out, we are safe for another day.


I'm removing a few bills from our daily list today. Despite my good intention to avoid any surprises, my inclusion of some legislation potentially on concurrence has, instead, caused confusion. A bill postponed at the end of the Spring Session will also be removed, leaving a single threat in today's list. The others will still be monitored closely, of course, though less publicly.



The House is scheduled for 9:00 AM today: the Senate for 9:30 AM.





Next Days Scheduled


House: 11/27/2018

Senate: 11/27/2018


House Calendar


Senate Calendar

.

.

procedure



Link to comment

So, this provides for enhanced penalties if one sells a gun to a non FFL without a FOID check?

Yes and this is why you can NEVER compromise on your rights. In 2013 when the law was changed to require a person to person check, but with no penalty, instead awarded civil immunity; it seemed like a fair compromise. However the anti gun establishment has turned their back on that deal and is throwing away the compromise and taking another baby bite out of our rights. They literally lied and tricked us. https://www.gunrights4illinois.com/blog/can-compromise-on-gun-law-be-a-bad-thing/

 

One baby bite at a time, the alligator shall eat us whole. You can not appease a hungry alligator by offering only one finger. The alligator will want your arm next and shall not be satisfied until you are eaten whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, this provides for enhanced penalties if one sells a gun to a non FFL without a FOID check?

 

Yes and this is why you can NEVER compromise on your rights. In 2013 when the law was changed to require a person to person check, but with no penalty, instead awarded civil immunity; it seemed like a fair compromise. However the anti gun establishment has turned their back on that deal and is throwing away the compromise and taking another baby bite out of our rights. They literally lied and tricked us. https://www.gunrights4illinois.com/blog/can-compromise-on-gun-law-be-a-bad-thing/

 

One baby bite at a time, the alligator shall eat us whole. You can not appease a hungry alligator by offering only one finger. The alligator will want your arm next and shall not be satisfied until you are eaten whole.

You cannot make honorable deals with people who have no honor. Will our side EVER learn that simple fact?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, this provides for enhanced penalties if one sells a gun to a non FFL without a FOID check?

Yes and this is why you can NEVER compromise on your rights. In 2013 when the law was changed to require a person to person check, but with no penalty, instead awarded civil immunity; it seemed like a fair compromise. However the anti gun establishment has turned their back on that deal and is throwing away the compromise and taking another baby bite out of our rights. They literally lied and tricked us. https://www.gunrights4illinois.com/blog/can-compromise-on-gun-law-be-a-bad-thing/

 

One baby bite at a time, the alligator shall eat us whole. You can not appease a hungry alligator by offering only one finger. The alligator will want your arm next and shall not be satisfied until you are eaten whole.

 

 

I say we give all the alligators one finger ... :devil: :flowers:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So, this provides for enhanced penalties if one sells a gun to a non FFL without a FOID check?

 

Yes and this is why you can NEVER compromise on your rights. In 2013 when the law was changed to require a person to person check, but with no penalty, instead awarded civil immunity; it seemed like a fair compromise. However the anti gun establishment has turned their back on that deal and is throwing away the compromise and taking another baby bite out of our rights. They literally lied and tricked us. https://www.gunrights4illinois.com/blog/can-compromise-on-gun-law-be-a-bad-thing/

 

One baby bite at a time, the alligator shall eat us whole. You can not appease a hungry alligator by offering only one finger. The alligator will want your arm next and shall not be satisfied until you are eaten whole.

Lying and tricking is their method of operation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A deal was not cut on this bill that I know about. The carry bill had just passed, we were celebrating around the rotunda and the next thing we knew, they brought this and I believe reporting lost/stolen to the floor and passed it.

It's been a number of years and nobody has ever accused me of having a good memory, but I recall the bill floating around for a little bit before it passed and civil immunity was something that added as it floated.

 

I absolutely could be wrong and I suppose I could do some digging on the ILGA website to see if there were any amendments to this bill. But it's also possible there were similiar bills, you know how thr ilga plays games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...