Jump to content

Could really use some help.


Donnydw150

Recommended Posts

If it has taken that long I'm certain that you are under board review. There have been instances where a person under board review hasn't went as long as 26 months. I would certainly assume that you are near a determination by the board,You have been patient this long it is best to just ride out the rest of the wave make certain that you are checking your online status a few times a week because when the board initially asked for a response to my law enforcement objections it was posted in blue highlight As soon as I logged in to check my status. If you were ever arrested The best thing to do now is to go and keep all of your court dispositions they will ask you case by case to explain in your own words what happened. It is very important to keep in mind you are not back on trial again the board is presumably on your side they want your explanation but they do not want you to say or admit that you are a danger to yourself or to the general public. An example would be if you got into A fight after you left the bar and you tell them that that is what happened they will deny I promise. If you say I was at a friends house and had a few beers and You in one of the neighbors got into a altercation that became physical again they will deny you. They are very specific in what they are looking for and that is is this person a danger to himself or a danger to the general public any drinking person that has access to a firearm and gets into an altercation is a danger to himself and a danger to the general public just keep things like that in mind when you respond.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've applied for my ccl in January 2016 and i still have yet to receive anything but the another 30days letter. I've never heard of anyone almost taking 2 years to get their card. Is there anyway to get my money back, or can i take legal action? Any help or advice would be grateful. Thank you

 

 

We have had many cases that went two years or longer which is why we have been working with the ISP, the Gov. office, and the CCL Review Board to end these long waits. We believe we have made a lot of progress and hope they are able to work through a great deal of the backlog in the next 6 months.

 

In the meantime, what is taking so long - most likely - is the CCL Review Board asks for more information from the objecting agency and that agency is not interested in responding in a timely manner so the board keeps asking for another 30 and another 30 days. Our work with the ISP and CCLRB has been to show that these long waits violate the statute and must end and believe it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've applied for my ccl in January 2016 and i still have yet to receive anything but the another 30days letter. I've never heard of anyone almost taking 2 years to get their card. Is there anyway to get my money back, or can i take legal action? Any help or advice would be grateful. Thank you

 

 

We have had many cases that went two years or longer which is why we have been working with the ISP, the Gov. office, and the CCL Review Board to end these long waits. We believe we have made a lot of progress and hope they are able to work through a great deal of the backlog in the next 6 months.

 

In the meantime, what is taking so long - most likely - is the CCL Review Board asks for more information from the objecting agency and that agency is not interested in responding in a timely manner so the board keeps asking for another 30 and another 30 days. Our work with the ISP and CCLRB has been to show that these long waits violate the statute and must end and believe it will.

 

Why not change the legislation so that any objections must be accompanied by any and all pertinent information to back up the objection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

We have had many cases that went two years or longer which is why we have been working with the ISP, the Gov. office, and the CCL Review Board to end these long waits. We believe we have made a lot of progress and hope they are able to work through a great deal of the backlog in the next 6 months.

 

In the meantime, what is taking so long - most likely - is the CCL Review Board asks for more information from the objecting agency and that agency is not interested in responding in a timely manner so the board keeps asking for another 30 and another 30 days. Our work with the ISP and CCLRB has been to show that these long waits violate the statute and must end and believe it will.

 

Why not change the legislation so that any objections must be accompanied by any and all pertinent information to back up the objection?

 

 

 

We have introduced legislation to do just that: SB1038

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...or give the objecting agency 30 days to provide it. If they do not, the objection is automatically overruled. That would take care of most of the the backlog in, well, 30 days.

 

Read the bill at Molly's link. Concentrate on the underlined sections. Then let us know what you find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

We have had many cases that went two years or longer which is why we have been working with the ISP, the Gov. office, and the CCL Review Board to end these long waits. We believe we have made a lot of progress and hope they are able to work through a great deal of the backlog in the next 6 months.

 

In the meantime, what is taking so long - most likely - is the CCL Review Board asks for more information from the objecting agency and that agency is not interested in responding in a timely manner so the board keeps asking for another 30 and another 30 days. Our work with the ISP and CCLRB has been to show that these long waits violate the statute and must end and believe it will.

 

Why not change the legislation so that any objections must be accompanied by any and all pertinent information to back up the objection?

 

 

 

We have introduced legislation to do just that: SB1038

 

As an Irish friend of mine would say, "Tis' a beautiful ting, me boyo!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Underlining:

 

Pg. 6 - Objections previously filed against an applicant shall not be considered as a basis for an objection for renewal of a concealed carry license unless another incident has occurred since the license applicant's last review by the Board. A law enforcement agency that submits an objection to a license applicant to the Department may withdraw the objection before it is submitted to the Board.

 

Pg. 7 - The Department may review and verify a law enforcement agency objection to a license applicant before the Department's submission of the objection to the Board. Any verification shall determine: (i) if the requirements under this Act for the submission of an objection by a law enforcement agency has been met, (ii) that the objection has been filed against the proper person, and (iii) that information relevant to the objection has been included. A law enforcement agency objection that fails this verification shall be returned to the objecting law enforcement agency and the law enforcement agency shall have 30 calendar days after receiving notification from the Department to submit the required information, provide the Department a response, or withdraw the objection. If the objecting law enforcement agency fails to respond within 30 calendar days, the Department shall reject the objection and process the application.

 

Pg. 8 - (c-5) If a law enforcement agency submits an erroneous objection or decides to withdraw an objection, the law enforcement agency shall notify the Department immediately and the objection shall be considered null and void. The Department shall notify the Board that the objection has been rescinded and the application shall be returned to the Department for completion of the application process.

 

Pg. 11/12 - (d-5) Immediately upon the receipt from the Department of notice of an objection, the Board shall notify the applicant of the referral of the application to the Board and that the 90-day period for the Department to issue or deny a license has been tolled. The notification of referral shall include the identity of the law enforcement agency submitting the objection and any detailed narrative upon which the objection is based. The Department may, however, exclude or redact information that may be confidential or which may impair or compromise an ongoing investigation. Notification to the applicant shall be by mail and the applicant's online application page. The notification of the referral shall inform the applicant of his or her right to submit a written statement to the Board on his or her behalf. The applicant's statement may include any documents that the applicant believes will clarify or substantiate the applicant's statement. This statement may be submitted by mail, email, or the applicant's online application page. The applicant shall have 45 days from the date the notification of the referral to the Board is sent to submit a statement. However, the applicant need not respond within 45 days if the applicant notifies the Board that an additional 45 days are needed to respond. An applicant shall have a maximum of 90 days in which to respond. If an applicant fails to respond within the 90-day period, the applicant shall be deemed to have waived his or her right to respond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...