Jump to content

Chicago Trib Column: 2A Doesn't Say Gun Ownership Has to be Free...


FoxtrotIndia

Recommended Posts

2A doesn't have to say, it is a given that there's no charges for Constitutional rights. Those bills are designed to make it harder for people who are supposed to have guns to legally obtain them.

Criminals can't use their fingerprints to obtain guns. What the bills would achieve is make it cost prohibitive for the poor and African Americans to legally obtain guns for protection. Those bills proposed come from Bloomberg and his groups who use any excuse to advance his civilian disarmament agenda under the guise of safety.

Our over lords don't want us to be able to defend ourselves. They want us dependant on them for our very safety and lives.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1A doesn't say speech is "free" in the sense of fees, taxes, etc. How about we do this...create a journalist licensing scheme. Must submit fingerprints to FBI. Cannot be a convicted felon, DD from armed services, drug user, etc etc. Let's see how far that gets. Probably not very since it's unconstitutional. Taxing a right is unconstitutional. Period.

 

3A doesn't say we have to pay to keep soldiers from being quartered in our homes.

 

4A doesn't say we have to pay a cop to not illegally search and seize our property and person.

 

5A doesn't say we have to pay for due process.

 

6A doesn't say that we have to pay for a speedy trial.

 

7A doesn't say we have to pay for the right to a trial by jury.

 

8A doesn't say we have to pay to not be subject to "cruel and unusual punishment"

 

Sent from my VS987 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...