Jump to content

mab22

Members
  • Posts

    4,431
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

1,943 profile views

mab22's Achievements

Member

Member (24/24)

  1. Doesn’t this also put a stick in the eye of the need for “permission slips to carry for self defense and or protection of personal property”?
  2. Try an oven set to 425F and toss an unloaded Glock in for 15 to 30 minutes per side and report back on how the plastic holds up. 😇
  3. Wrapping in foil won't work. Besides what happens when aluminum reaches 4200F + degrees? when locked, is incapable of being opened without the key, keypad, combination, or other unlocking mechanism
  4. I would equate it to only being able to own “plasma rifles, which have a range of 35 watts or less.” I don’t want to give the ID 10 T’s any help, so I won’t point out too much.
  5. There is no way comply with the requirements.
  6. Does this mean Eastercrock and his fellow black robes get to let the dementia fuel another ridiculous ruling?
  7. I like the way it's thrown back in the states face.
  8. Thank you for explaining that, I have NO faith in anything happening in Illinoistan, it's too corrupt.
  9. I don’t trust them! When they are done with it, what will happen is everyone will be exempt from the FOID except regular citizens. I’ll believe if signed and removed from all citizens as a requirement, but until then…. It’s another Lucy holding the football to me.
  10. Have you read through this HB4327? We are being played on this one! It's removing restrictions from the State Police, and possibly a few other groups, requiring them to have a FOID cards! WHY? Probably because of a couple of current law suits, some of which involve the 14th amendment and equal protection. Maybe people have been following the Devore cases. And WHY would Representative Kevin Schmidt (R), 114th District be a sponsor of this? At the end of the post they strike out the FOID act in something relation to non-citizens. Some Examples - Bottom of page 30 of this PDF, the strike through of item 6.. https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/103/HB/PDF/10300HB4327lv.pdf This is all stricken, or removed from the law. Law enforcement agencies should provide training on the Firearm Owner's Identification Card Act, including seeking relief from the Illinois State Police under Section 10 of the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act and a FOID card being a continued condition of employment under Section 7.2 of the Uniform Peace Officers' Disciplinary Act. (Source: P.A. 102-352, eff. 6-1-22; 103-154, eff. 6-30-23.) Page 31 has another entry striking a FOID requirement. I bolded it to bring it out. (20 ILCS 805/805-538) Sec. 805-538. Retiring officer; purchase of service firearm and police badge. The Director of Natural Resources shall establish a program to allow a Conservation Police Officer who is honorably retiring in good standing to purchase either one or both of the following: (1) any Department of Natural Resources police badge previously issued to that officer; or (2) if the officer has a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card, the service firearm issued or previously issued to the officer by the Department of Natural Resources. The cost of the firearm shall be the replacement value of the firearm and not the firearm's fair market value. (Source: P.A. 100-931, eff. 8-17-18.) And another one on page 32. Sec. 2505-306. Retiring investigators; purchase of service firearm and badge. The Director shall establish a program to allow a Department investigator who is honorably retiring in good standing to purchase either one or both of the following: (1) any badge previously issued to the investigator by the Department; or (2) if the investigator has a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card, the service firearm issued or previously issued to the investigator by the Department. The cost of the firearm shall be the replacement value of the firearm and not the firearm's fair market value. (Source: P.A. 102-719, eff. 5-6-22.) Page 21 So illegals can make purchases or get FOIDS!? Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the ability of a law enforcement agency or law enforcement official to request evidence of citizenship or immigration status pursuant to the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act, the Firearm Concealed Carry Act, Article 24 of the Criminal Code of 2012, or 18 United States Code Sections 921 through 931.
  11. It's a somewhat sarcastic question. So she WAS, not IS, the Chief Justice, don't we have independent judges, this whole system is lawless and corrupt, all the way to the supreme court. Democrats buying each other off, and we don't want to what they do to each other. If it were Republican's we would never hear the end of it, the media would be frothing at the mouth and slobbering all over! If your a Democrat "it's OKAY WHEN WE DO IT!" Maybe we should request two separate court systems, Democrat and OTHER!
  12. And why would the majority recuse themselves? Party affiliation? Money received they can't pay back? They don't want to upset "Mr. Burke & associates", who might tell them what a nice court room them they? It's all intriguing....
  13. All good quality legislation is done that way in Illinoiistan.
×
×
  • Create New...