Illinois possibly two votes away from concealed carry
#31
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:47 AM
#32
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:53 AM
I just don't feel like researching Moore & Shepard to see where they're at. I don't want to sound like I don't know what I'm talking about, so if anyone already has their facts straight in an existing correspondance and is willing to share, that would be helpfull.
#33
Posted 10 May 2012 - 10:55 AM
I am writing you today to ask for your support on HB 148/ and 5745. As a law abiding citizen, I support the 2nd Amendment and the right to self defense and preserving my life and family should the need arise. My fiancé and I travel from Orland to the two biggest buildings downtown everyday without a way to protect ourselves. Both of us have CPD officers as friends and they support CCW and have told me that they don’t have to intervene in a crime that would put them in harms way. As I’m sure you know with the courts poised to rule on Shepard, and Moore- Constitutional Carry is real and I hope for this. I urge you to support this issue and for the people of IL the right to bear arms.
I would appreciate your response and vote IN FAVOR of these two bills. "
then I sign w my full name address and telephone number in case they would like to speak to me.
#34
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:21 AM
boomersand, on 10 May 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
I am writing you today to ask for your support on HB 148/ and 5745. As a law abiding citizen, I support the 2nd Amendment and the right to self defense and preserving my life and family should the need arise. My fiancé and I travel from Orland to the two biggest buildings downtown everyday without a way to protect ourselves. Both of us have CPD officers as friends and they support CCW and have told me that they don’t have to intervene in a crime that would put them in harms way. As I’m sure you know with the courts poised to rule on Shepard, and Moore- Constitutional Carry is real and I hope for this. I urge you to support this issue and for the people of IL the right to bear arms.
I would appreciate your response and vote IN FAVOR of these two bills. "
then I sign w my full name address and telephone number in case they would like to speak to me.
You went the warm fuzzy route. I'm thinking of the "do you want it down your throat?" route.
I typed this up earlier today. Debating whether or not to send it.
Quote
A court in Maryland has already ruled that the state's discretionary permitting system is unconstitutional. This case, Woolard Vs. Sheridan, will most likely go to the Supreme Court of the United States.
In any of these cases a ruling in favor of the People's right to keep and bear arms will spell an end to Illinois' ban.
When the Illinois ban is struck down the following will be true:
1)There will be no permit necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
2)There will be no additional background checks necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
3)There will be no additional specialized training necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
4)Citizens will carry a firearm for self defense in public both concealed and openly with impunity.
5)"No gun" signs posted by businesses will have zero legal weight and will be disregarded with impunity.
6)Citizens will carry handguns, rifles, and shotguns for self defense with impunity.
7)Citizens will carry firearms for self defense in every county and city in Illinois including Chicago with impunity.
Voting in favor of a shall issue concealed carry law in Illinois will prevent many of the above conditions. Which way do you want it?
Edited by Davey, 10 May 2012 - 11:23 AM.

Yes, I really look like this.
#35
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:32 AM
Davey, on 10 May 2012 - 11:21 AM, said:
boomersand, on 10 May 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
I am writing you today to ask for your support on HB 148/ and 5745. As a law abiding citizen, I support the 2nd Amendment and the right to self defense and preserving my life and family should the need arise. My fiancé and I travel from Orland to the two biggest buildings downtown everyday without a way to protect ourselves. Both of us have CPD officers as friends and they support CCW and have told me that they don’t have to intervene in a crime that would put them in harms way. As I’m sure you know with the courts poised to rule on Shepard, and Moore- Constitutional Carry is real and I hope for this. I urge you to support this issue and for the people of IL the right to bear arms.
I would appreciate your response and vote IN FAVOR of these two bills. "
then I sign w my full name address and telephone number in case they would like to speak to me.
You went the warm fuzzy route. I'm thinking of the "do you want it down your throat?" route.
I typed this up earlier today. Debating whether or not to send it.
Quote
A court in Maryland has already ruled that the state's discretionary permitting system is unconstitutional. This case, Woolard Vs. Sheridan, will most likely go to the Supreme Court of the United States.
In any of these cases a ruling in favor of the People's right to keep and bear arms will spell an end to Illinois' ban.
When the Illinois ban is struck down the following will be true:
1)There will be no permit necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
2)There will be no additional background checks necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
3)There will be no additional specialized training necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
4)Citizens will carry a firearm for self defense in public both concealed and openly with impunity.
5)"No gun" signs posted by businesses will have zero legal weight and will be disregarded with impunity.
6)Citizens will carry handguns, rifles, and shotguns for self defense with impunity.
7)Citizens will carry firearms for self defense in every county and city in Illinois including Chicago with impunity.
Voting in favor of a shall issue concealed carry law in Illinois will prevent many of the above conditions. Which way do you want it?
#36
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:35 AM
-Thomas Jefferson-
Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-
#37
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:52 AM
Tvandermyde, on 10 May 2012 - 10:13 AM, said:
Things are getting closer
I hope you didn't mind my poking fun at the Task Force in post #4. I was hoping a little laughter would break the tension of waiting.
I'm sure the report will "knock it right out of the park!"
but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda,
they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." — Jeff Cooper, The Art of the Rifle
#38
Posted 10 May 2012 - 11:57 AM
-Thomas Jefferson-
Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-
#39
Posted 10 May 2012 - 12:02 PM
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1776
Life Member NRA, ISRA, CCRKBA & SAF
#42
Posted 10 May 2012 - 03:34 PM
Davey, on 10 May 2012 - 11:21 AM, said:
boomersand, on 10 May 2012 - 10:55 AM, said:
I am writing you today to ask for your support on HB 148/ and 5745. As a law abiding citizen, I support the 2nd Amendment and the right to self defense and preserving my life and family should the need arise. My fiancé and I travel from Orland to the two biggest buildings downtown everyday without a way to protect ourselves. Both of us have CPD officers as friends and they support CCW and have told me that they don’t have to intervene in a crime that would put them in harms way. As I’m sure you know with the courts poised to rule on Shepard, and Moore- Constitutional Carry is real and I hope for this. I urge you to support this issue and for the people of IL the right to bear arms.
I would appreciate your response and vote IN FAVOR of these two bills. "
then I sign w my full name address and telephone number in case they would like to speak to me.
You went the warm fuzzy route. I'm thinking of the "do you want it down your throat?" route.
I typed this up earlier today. Debating whether or not to send it.
Quote
A court in Maryland has already ruled that the state's discretionary permitting system is unconstitutional. This case, Woolard Vs. Sheridan, will most likely go to the Supreme Court of the United States.
In any of these cases a ruling in favor of the People's right to keep and bear arms will spell an end to Illinois' ban.
When the Illinois ban is struck down the following will be true:
1)There will be no permit necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
2)There will be no additional background checks necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
3)There will be no additional specialized training necessary to carry a firearm for self defense.
4)Citizens will carry a firearm for self defense in public both concealed and openly with impunity.
5)"No gun" signs posted by businesses will have zero legal weight and will be disregarded with impunity.
6)Citizens will carry handguns, rifles, and shotguns for self defense with impunity.
7)Citizens will carry firearms for self defense in every county and city in Illinois including Chicago with impunity.
Voting in favor of a shall issue concealed carry law in Illinois will prevent many of the above conditions. Which way do you want it?
8)The state of Illinois will miss out on a boat-load of money that can be gained through a licensing process.
(I'm not thrilled about paying for a right, but I'm less happy being left defenseless.)
#43
Posted 10 May 2012 - 03:40 PM
Getzapped, on 10 May 2012 - 10:20 AM, said:
HER EMAIL ADDRESS IS RepEmily@gmail.com
I have no problem whipping dead horses.
If the thief is found breaking in, and he is struck so that he dies, there shall be no guilt for his bloodshed.
Gun control is not about guns, it's about control. Once they have all the guns, they'll also have complete control.-Abolt
Guns kill people just like beds get girls pregnant.
#44
Posted 10 May 2012 - 03:57 PM
#45
Posted 10 May 2012 - 04:07 PM
billzfx4, on 10 May 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:
Illinois has an $8,000,000,000 budget deficit.
You do the math.
#46
Posted 10 May 2012 - 04:19 PM
If the thief is found breaking in, and he is struck so that he dies, there shall be no guilt for his bloodshed.
Gun control is not about guns, it's about control. Once they have all the guns, they'll also have complete control.-Abolt
Guns kill people just like beds get girls pregnant.
#47
Posted 10 May 2012 - 04:19 PM
JackTripper, on 10 May 2012 - 04:07 PM, said:
billzfx4, on 10 May 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:
Illinois has an $8,000,000,000 budget deficit.
You do the math.
Well, it's more that they had.... besides, when budget axes fall again it's much harder to cut something that's actually bringing in money.
~"An invasion of mainland America is unwise. Behind every blade of grass a rifle would await us"
-Yamamoto Isoroku
Yes. I'm predicting that Chicago/Cook county will be sold out in order to get "shall issue".
#48
Posted 10 May 2012 - 04:30 PM
JackTripper, on 10 May 2012 - 04:07 PM, said:
billzfx4, on 10 May 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:
Illinois has an $8,000,000,000 budget deficit.
You do the math.
This is the fiscal note on HB148 from the ISP. I did the math, $32,000,000 in additional revenue is WAY more than some of the other savings proposed by Gov. Quincomtax. Fiscal Note, House Floor Amendment No. 2 (Illinois State Police)
Quote
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote."-- Benjamin Franklin
#49
Posted 10 May 2012 - 04:39 PM
JackTripper, on 10 May 2012 - 04:07 PM, said:
billzfx4, on 10 May 2012 - 03:34 PM, said:
Illinois has an $8,000,000,000 budget deficit.
You do the math.
True, $28,000,000 profit is not much compared to an 8 BILLION deficit. But remember, Quinn wants to close prisons and mental health facitlities just to save $12 milllion. Both of those actions put people out of work and create hardships on Illinois citizens. You can pass RTC, put 25+ people to work, and more than make up the proposed cuts to the ISP for this year. And that's after you upgrade the ISP computer system and make some improvements to other equipment.
The financial aspect is certainly NOT a negative.
Tim
The Roman Empire fell due to a large, corrupt government, overspending, an overextended military, insecure borders, and the illegal immigration of Goths, barbarians (anyone who was not educated), and religious fanatics. Sound familiar?
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams
Luke 11:21 - "When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed." NASB
#50
Posted 10 May 2012 - 04:49 PM
Seriously, the legalization of dueling would end political pandering and solve political corruption in the State
ITWT Club Member 001
ONE STATE- ONE LAW
#51
Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:27 PM
Edited by vezpa, 10 May 2012 - 07:28 PM.
#52
Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:34 PM
Seriously, the legalization of dueling would end political pandering and solve political corruption in the State
ITWT Club Member 001
ONE STATE- ONE LAW
#53
Posted 10 May 2012 - 08:47 PM
And aren't there 118 house members?
And isn't 2/3 of 118 = 78 ???
#54
Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:03 PM
C0untZer0, on 10 May 2012 - 08:47 PM, said:
And aren't there 118 house members?
And isn't 2/3 of 118 = 78 ???
No, we need a 3/5ths majority = 60%.
Do the math.
Do you really think that people that have been doing this for 10+ years don't know how many votes it takes??
The Roman Empire fell due to a large, corrupt government, overspending, an overextended military, insecure borders, and the illegal immigration of Goths, barbarians (anyone who was not educated), and religious fanatics. Sound familiar?
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams
Luke 11:21 - "When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed." NASB
#55
Posted 10 May 2012 - 09:23 PM
#56
Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:54 AM
in style'. This is about control.
Seriously, the legalization of dueling would end political pandering and solve political corruption in the State
ITWT Club Member 001
ONE STATE- ONE LAW
#57
Posted 11 May 2012 - 05:56 AM
C0untZer0, on 10 May 2012 - 08:47 PM, said:
And aren't there 118 house members?
And isn't 2/3 of 118 = 78 ???
Here we go
#58
Posted 11 May 2012 - 06:41 AM
My question is this: Is there any benefit a representative gains by sponsoring a bill? What distinguishes a Chief Co-Sponsor from a Co-Sponsor?
#59
Posted 11 May 2012 - 07:37 AM
-Thomas Jefferson-
Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-
#60
Posted 11 May 2012 - 07:47 AM
abolt243, on 10 May 2012 - 09:03 PM, said:
C0untZer0, on 10 May 2012 - 08:47 PM, said:
And aren't there 118 house members?
And isn't 2/3 of 118 = 78 ???
No, we need a 3/5ths majority = 60%.
Do the math.
Do you really think that people that have been doing this for 10+ years don't know how many votes it takes??
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











