Jump to content


Photo

Judge tosses California ammunition purchase law

more snow in hades

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 mikew

    Member

  • Members
  • 5,339 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 04

Posted 23 April 2020 - 11:48 PM

https://apnews.com/d...36ec96dc6156aa2

 

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday blocked a California law requiring background checks for people buying ammunition, issuing a sharply worded rebuke of “onerous and convoluted” regulations that violate the constitutional right to bear arms.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego ruled in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which asked him to stop the checks and related restrictions on ammo sales.

“The experiment has been tried. The casualties have been counted. California’s new ammunition background check law misfires and the Second Amendment rights of California citizens have been gravely injured,” Benitez wrote in a 120-page opinion granting the group’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

Voters approved toughening California’s already strict firearms laws in 2016, and the restrictions took effect last July.

 

---more---



#2 Euler

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,548 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 18

Posted 24 April 2020 - 12:42 AM

The case is Rhode v Becerra.
showtopic=72590

IN ?

Edited by Euler, 24 April 2020 - 12:42 AM.

The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.

- Albert Camus, Resistance, Rebellion, and Death, 1960.


#3 springfield shooter

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 437 posts
  • Joined: 18-February 16

Posted 24 April 2020 - 07:36 AM

Judge Roger T. Benitez:

 

https://en.wikipedia...oger_T._Benitez


"I can't spare this man. He fights."  Abraham Lincoln


#4 DarkLord

    Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 70 posts
  • Joined: 06-March 19

Posted 24 April 2020 - 07:49 AM

He will change his mind  next week, like he did when he ruled on the magazine ban..



#5 Raw Power

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 2,303 posts
  • Joined: 26-April 16

Posted 24 April 2020 - 08:08 AM

Good news.



#6 Johnnybgood

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,392 posts
  • Joined: 02-April 05

Posted 24 April 2020 - 09:44 AM

"Voters approved toughening California’s already strict firearms laws in 2016, and the restrictions took effect last July." Meaning the lefties used the dead, the illegals, and the fake votes to get it passed.



#7 mikew

    Member

  • Members
  • 5,339 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 04

Posted 24 April 2020 - 09:57 AM

Judge Roger T. Benitez:

 

https://en.wikipedia...oger_T._Benitez

Born to escape communism, not promote it.



#8 steveTA84

    Member

  • Members
  • 7,804 posts
  • Joined: 14-December 15

Posted 24 April 2020 - 02:14 PM

"Voters approved toughening California’s already strict firearms laws in 2016, and the restrictions took effect last July." Meaning the lefties used the dead, the illegals, and the fake votes to get it passed.


No, meaning that just because it’s popular and supported by a bunch of brain dead sheeple doesn’t make it lawful or right :)

#9 once0217

  • Members
  • 39 posts
  • Joined: 25-June 17

Posted 24 April 2020 - 06:24 PM

He just denied the states stay request.

#10 press1280

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 287 posts
  • Joined: 23-October 11

Posted 25 April 2020 - 10:07 AM

But the 9th granted the request, so we're stuck with this for another 1-2 years at least. Never ever get excited over a District Court opinion.



#11 Talonap

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,594 posts
  • Joined: 12-July 08

Posted 25 April 2020 - 02:06 PM

But the 9th granted the request, so we're stuck with this for another 1-2 years at least. Never ever get excited over a District Court opinion.

Have a link to that info? Just so we can read it...


Edited by Talonap, 25 April 2020 - 02:06 PM.


#12 Talonap

    Member

  • Members
  • 3,594 posts
  • Joined: 12-July 08

Posted 25 April 2020 - 02:32 PM

 

But the 9th granted the request, so we're stuck with this for another 1-2 years at least. Never ever get excited over a District Court opinion.

Have a link to that info? Just so we can read it...

 

Never mind, here's one:

 

https://www.nraila.o...mo-restrictions
 



#13 mab22

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 678 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 18

Posted 04 May 2020 - 09:47 PM

That was out of Comifornia ? :poke: HOLY ---- Batman!


Void the FOID!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users