Sweeper13 Posted September 16, 2017 at 01:01 PM Share Posted September 16, 2017 at 01:01 PM Here u go... http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/15/federal-judge-says-attorney-general-jeff-sessions-can-t-withhold-grant-money-from-sanctuary-cities-associated-press-reports.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WitchDoctor Posted September 16, 2017 at 07:17 PM Share Posted September 16, 2017 at 07:17 PM Geez, and this too: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/16/maryland-city-rescinds-vote-that-allowed-illegal-immigrants-to-ballot-in-local-elections.html This will not be good for people who think only legalized citizens should be able to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiliconSorcerer Posted September 16, 2017 at 08:03 PM Share Posted September 16, 2017 at 08:03 PM They lost this year because it was not in the 0bama requirements, next year it will be in the requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcc Posted September 17, 2017 at 08:44 AM Share Posted September 17, 2017 at 08:44 AM Simple solution. Sanctuary cities, place ICE officers at every jail to scene every arrest. Almost forgot, cut the cost of the officers from the funds the city would normally get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcc Posted September 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM Share Posted September 17, 2017 at 10:34 AM Screen every arrest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobPistol Posted September 17, 2017 at 01:05 PM Share Posted September 17, 2017 at 01:05 PM Simple solution. Sanctuary cities, place ICE officers at every jail to scene every arrest. Almost forgot, cut the cost of the officers from the funds the city would normally get. Why at every arrest? They'll get deported and not punished for their crimes. No, place them at release processing. They are heading out the door after serving their sentence, oh hello there, please come with us. Now THAT sends a message. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockman Posted September 17, 2017 at 01:50 PM Share Posted September 17, 2017 at 01:50 PM Grant money is grant money, the grant can be terminated, modified or withheld. It is not the cities money until they actually receive it. Why do judges all of the sudden say withholding grant money is wrong, but to withhold grant money to further an agenda, speed limits, drinking age and smoking is perfectly ok? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcc Posted September 17, 2017 at 08:10 PM Share Posted September 17, 2017 at 08:10 PM Why at every arrest? They'll get deported and not punished for their crimes. No, place them at release processing. They are heading out the door after serving their sentence, oh hello there, please come with us. Now THAT sends a message. You screen arrests, that way can have charges already in place, and they can not be released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soundguy Posted September 19, 2017 at 12:47 AM Share Posted September 19, 2017 at 12:47 AM Grant money is grant money, the grant can be terminated, modified or withheld. It is not the cities money until they actually receive it. Why do judges all of the sudden say withholding grant money is wrong, but to withhold grant money to further an agenda, speed limits, drinking age and smoking is perfectly ok? Sent from my iPad using TapatalkPerhaps they see it as furthering a political agenda. Maybe it's grants already agreed upon rather than future grant eligibility. I have no answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTX63 Posted September 19, 2017 at 01:39 AM Share Posted September 19, 2017 at 01:39 AM The 21st century government-EOs and judicial decrees;congress is just the bleating sounds you hear in the background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragsbo Posted September 19, 2017 at 11:23 PM Share Posted September 19, 2017 at 11:23 PM Just because some liberal activist "judge" rules one way does NOT mean that it is that way. I expect the ruling to get over ruled up appeal. These are grants= money given to the localities= not owed them. The feds can put just about any strings on them they want. Remember the threat to get highway funds pulled unless they made 55 the speed limit under Carter I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.