Posted 25 March 2019 - 11:29 PM
So, since the statute banning stun guns/Tasers in essence, has never been Constitutional, and as a result a giant's butt-load of AUUW convictions are now going to need to be re-adjudicated or expunged, will there be any possibility for compensation from the state to those adversely affected by those convictions?
"A well educated Media, being necessary for the preservation of free speech, the right of the people to keep and read books, shall not be infringed."
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Who gets to keep and read books? The Media? Or is it the People?
"One can never underestimate the idiocy of those determined to be offended by things that don't affect their real lives in the slightest." —Me
"Hatred is the sharpest sword; the desire for peace is armor made of willow leaves in the face of an enemy who despises you, as neither alone will stop a strike that is aimed at your neck."—Samurai proverb
"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life."—Robert Heinlein
"I reserve the right to take any action necessary to maintain the equilibrium in which I've chosen to exist."—Me
"It ain't braggin' if you done it."—Will Rogers