Jump to content

Masciandaro Update


blackhalo

Recommended Posts

So now the Solicitor General is of the opinion that strict scrutiny applies only in the home. Since the reference in the Heller decision was an example, "such as in the home", then Mr. Solicitor please list all the other examples of places where strict scrutiny should apply? After all, "such as in the home" was only one such example. Or will he argue that in the home was the only place used as the example?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it's not exactly what we want to hear, the Solicitor General's opinion could be used in our favor in Moore and Shepard. He seems to say that the circuit court tacitly agreed that the 2A applies outside the home, but that intermediate scrutiny applies. Illinois' complete ban outside the home cannot survive even intermediate scrutiny.

 

I don't agree with him, but I think it could bolster our case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it's not exactly what we want to hear, the Solicitor General's opinion could be used in our favor in Moore and Shepard. He seems to say that the circuit court tacitly agreed that the 2A applies outside the home, but that intermediate scrutiny applies. Illinois' complete ban outside the home cannot survive even intermediate scrutiny.

 

I don't agree with him, but I think it could bolster our case.

well you can see that this is what the judge in our case was waiting for. so our case is shot to heck. cause these idiots judges don't care about our right's so there you have it our ruling for Illinois.:thumbsup: :headbang1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it's not exactly what we want to hear, the Solicitor General's opinion could be used in our favor in Moore and Shepard. He seems to say that the circuit court tacitly agreed that the 2A applies outside the home, but that intermediate scrutiny applies. Illinois' complete ban outside the home cannot survive even intermediate scrutiny.

 

I don't agree with him, but I think it could bolster our case.

well you can see that this is what the judge in our case was waiting for. so our case is shot to heck. cause these idiots judges don't care about our right's so there you have it our ruling for Illinois.:thumbsup: :headbang1:

Yep. Pretty big setback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it's not exactly what we want to hear, the Solicitor General's opinion could be used in our favor in Moore and Shepard. He seems to say that the circuit court tacitly agreed that the 2A applies outside the home, but that intermediate scrutiny applies. Illinois' complete ban outside the home cannot survive even intermediate scrutiny.

 

I don't agree with him, but I think it could bolster our case.

well you can see that this is what the judge in our case was waiting for. so our case is shot to heck. cause these idiots judges don't care about our right's so there you have it our ruling for Illinois.:thumbsup: :headbang1:

Yep. Pretty big setback.

and i don't think they will stop there either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its going to impact our cases negatively at all. First, this is only the Solicitor General's opinion, he's just a government lawyer, not a judge. Secondly, he admits that there is a 2A right outside the home, which is our argument in the Moore and Shepard cases. Lastly, he says it is subject to intermediate scrutiny. SCOTUS said in Heller that a complete ban cannot survive *any* level of scrutiny. We'd rather have strict scrutiny, but even under intermediate scrutiny, we should win. At least that's what Gura and our other attorneys are arguing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its going to impact our cases negatively at all. First, this is only the Solicitor General's opinion, he's just a government lawyer, not a judge. Secondly, he admits that there is a 2A right outside the home, which is our argument in the Moore and Shepard cases. Lastly, he says it is subject to intermediate scrutiny. SCOTUS said in Heller that a complete ban cannot survive *any* level of scrutiny. We'd rather have strict scrutiny, but even under intermediate scrutiny, we should win. At least that's what Gura and our other attorneys are arguing.

i hope it don't, that just didn't set with me right when you said it will bolster our case. so think i have my took your statement the wrong way than. sorry for the ramp than.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its going to impact our cases negatively at all. First, this is only the Solicitor General's opinion, he's just a government lawyer, not a judge. Secondly, he admits that there is a 2A right outside the home, which is our argument in the Moore and Shepard cases. Lastly, he says it is subject to intermediate scrutiny. SCOTUS said in Heller that a complete ban cannot survive *any* level of scrutiny. We'd rather have strict scrutiny, but even under intermediate scrutiny, we should win. At least that's what Gura and our other attorneys are arguing.

i hope it don't, that just didn't set with me right when you said it will bolster our case. so think i have my took your statement the wrong way than. sorry for the ramp than.

 

"Bolster = to add to, support, or uphold (sometimes followed by up): They bolstered their morale by singing. He bolstered up his claim with new evidence."

 

And, I assume you mean rant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its going to impact our cases negatively at all. First, this is only the Solicitor General's opinion, he's just a government lawyer, not a judge. Secondly, he admits that there is a 2A right outside the home, which is our argument in the Moore and Shepard cases. Lastly, he says it is subject to intermediate scrutiny. SCOTUS said in Heller that a complete ban cannot survive *any* level of scrutiny. We'd rather have strict scrutiny, but even under intermediate scrutiny, we should win. At least that's what Gura and our other attorneys are arguing.

i hope it don't, that just didn't set with me right when you said it will bolster our case. so think i have my took your statement the wrong way than. sorry for the ramp than.

 

"Bolster = to add to, support, or uphold (sometimes followed by up): They bolstered their morale by singing. He bolstered up his claim with new evidence."

 

And, I assume you mean rant.

i'm so mad i cant even type, but yea rant. i just need to wait before i comment on things now,so it can be more explain better. sorry guys

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...