kevinmcc Posted August 20, 2018 at 04:03 AM Share Posted August 20, 2018 at 04:03 AM WHEREAS, The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld theconstitutionality of reasonable state gun violence preventionregulations; Conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alitostated in the McDonald decision that state "experimentationwith reasonable firearms regulations will continue under theSecond Amendment"; andI just read over all this. She is quoting from Alito's decision where Alito quoted the amici of 38 states petitioning. That was not Alito's decision... She totally does not understand McDonald v. Chicago. This woman calls herself a law maker???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tango7 Posted August 20, 2018 at 11:16 AM Share Posted August 20, 2018 at 11:16 AM I just read over all this. She is quoting from Alito's decision where Alito quoted the amici of 38 states petitioning. That was not Alito's decision... She totally does not understand McDonald v. Chicago. This woman calls herself a law maker???? Since when is knowledge of the law or lawmaking process a requirement for service in the Illannoys legislature? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xwing Posted August 20, 2018 at 04:59 PM Share Posted August 20, 2018 at 04:59 PM Typical authoritarian socialist liar. She is a disgusting individual... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soylentgreen Posted August 21, 2018 at 12:50 AM Share Posted August 21, 2018 at 12:50 AM WHEREAS, The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld theconstitutionality of reasonable state gun violence preventionregulations; Conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alitostated in the McDonald decision that state "experimentationwith reasonable firearms regulations will continue under theSecond Amendment"; andI just read over all this. She is quoting from Alito's decision where Alito quoted the amici of 38 states petitioning. That was not Alito's decision... She totally does not understand McDonald v. Chicago. This woman calls herself a law maker???? Most so-called "lawmakers" are criminals in their own right. In most cases they don't know what they're talking about or are downright lying...or are just plain evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2A4Cook Posted August 21, 2018 at 01:10 AM Share Posted August 21, 2018 at 01:10 AM These people are beyond disgusting. Counties upholding the U.S. Constitution are lawless, etc., but granting "sanctuary" to illegal aliens" and thumbing their noses at federal law is just fine and dandy. A bath in a 55 gallon drum of Janitor in a Drum couldn't cleanse these scum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted August 21, 2018 at 03:13 AM Author Share Posted August 21, 2018 at 03:13 AM Well, she has one co-sponsor now Representative Jonathan Carroll (D)57th District Springfield Office:241-E Stratton Office BuildingSpringfield, IL 62706(217) 558-1004District Office:830 S. Buffalo Grove Rd.Suite 120Buffalo Grove, IL 60089(847) 229-5499(847) 377-9497 FAXEmail: repjonathancarroll@gmail.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted August 21, 2018 at 03:34 AM Share Posted August 21, 2018 at 03:34 AM · Hidden by Molly B., December 4, 2018 at 11:33 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., December 4, 2018 at 11:33 PM - No reason given Well, she has one co-sponsor nowRepresentative Jonathan Carroll (D)57th District Springfield Office:241-E Stratton Office BuildingSpringfield, IL 62706(217) 558-1004District Office:830 S. Buffalo Grove Rd.Suite 120Buffalo Grove, IL 60089(847) 229-5499(847) 377-9497 FAXEmail: repjonathancarroll@gmail.comSlam his email and phone http://i.imgur.com/TM7Y9Zc.jpg Link to comment
G214me Posted August 22, 2018 at 05:29 AM Share Posted August 22, 2018 at 05:29 AM · Hidden by Molly B., December 4, 2018 at 11:32 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., December 4, 2018 at 11:32 PM - No reason given Well, she has one co-sponsor nowRepresentative Jonathan Carroll (D)57th DistrictSpringfield Office:241-E Stratton Office BuildingSpringfield, IL 62706(217) 558-1004District Office:830 S. Buffalo Grove Rd.Suite 120Buffalo Grove, IL 60089(847) 229-5499(847) 377-9497 FAXEmail: repjonathancarroll@gmail.comSlam his email and phone http://i.imgur.com/TM7Y9Zc.jpg Whenever you see someone with that shirt ( or whatever other similar garbage ) take a moment to point out that it is THEM who work to keep teachers unarmed and unable to defend students, that it is THEM who diverts going after criminals in favor of going after law abiding citizens, that it is THEM who exploits murder victims to push their sick agenda. accuse them of playing a part in making it easier for killers. make sure you're loud enough so everyone can hear, of course be polite and non threatening. Link to comment
tricolor Posted August 27, 2018 at 02:55 AM Share Posted August 27, 2018 at 02:55 AM · Hidden by Molly B., December 4, 2018 at 11:32 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., December 4, 2018 at 11:32 PM - No reason given Well, she has one co-sponsor nowRepresentative Jonathan Carroll (D)57th DistrictSpringfield Office:241-E Stratton Office BuildingSpringfield, IL 62706(217) 558-1004District Office:830 S. Buffalo Grove Rd.Suite 120Buffalo Grove, IL 60089(847) 229-5499(847) 377-9497 FAXEmail: repjonathancarroll@gmail.comSlam his email and phone http://i.imgur.com/TM7Y9Zc.jpg Whenever you see someone with that shirt ( or whatever other similar garbage ) take a moment to point out that it is THEM who work to keep teachers unarmed and unable to defend students, that it is THEM who diverts going after criminals in favor of going after law abiding citizens, that it is THEM who exploits murder victims to push their sick agenda. accuse them of playing a part in making it easier for killers. make sure you're loud enough so everyone can hear, of course be polite and non threatening. Simple, to the point and undeniably true. This makes people think outside of the spoon-fed talking points garbage they have been indoctrinated with. Link to comment
DD123 Posted August 28, 2018 at 02:49 PM Share Posted August 28, 2018 at 02:49 PM What's ironic about her sponsoring this "condemnation" is that she's condemning local communities who wish to decide what's best for their own communities in relation to guns. Didn't she sponsor a bill whose goal it was to allow local communities to decide what's best for their communities as it relates to guns? She's so stupid it's not even funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chancemccall Posted August 31, 2018 at 10:50 PM Share Posted August 31, 2018 at 10:50 PM This is not my work, I am just sharing it: Guns owners are disrespectful of authority. This recent gun sanctuary county movement is proof of this as pointed out by Rep. Willis. A failure to rely on authorities is an invariable sign of improper and overly independent attitudes. They gather together to talk about guns at gun shops, gun shows, shooting ranges, and on the internet because they have some plot going against the government. A gun owner should have no right to associate with another gun owner. To help ensure our right to safety we must insist on the government banning and seizing all guns from private hands, and forbid NRA-based criticism towards people who are only trying to help. Searching the homes of all NRA members for any guns and pro-gun literature will go a long way towards reducing crime. Common sense requires only uniformed soldiers, police, and other agents of the state have access to firearms. No person should be able to challenge this by writing to legislators or giving money to evil and racist lobbyists. If they do they should be forced in court to admit to it then put into prison. Making it mandatory that church ministers preach against guns or else they can’t get licensed will certainly encourage the church folk to have the correct belief about guns. We should hold a nation-wide vote against guns but gun-owners should be excluded from voting. They are too biased and too ignorant to be allowed to vote. This would level the playing field by letting these racists get a taste of their own medicine. People who don’t like all this prove they are on the side of the killers with the guns and should be put in jail with all the gangbangers and other gun nuts. Letting them sit in jail for a few years before they are charged will give the government plenty of time to find something wrong in their lives. Anything they say, write, or express should be held against them to prove their guilt. We should bring all of them here to Chicago to be tried with the Mayor as judge, and we should allow only mothers who have lost children to gunfire to be on the juries. Any attorney who tries to defend them should be arrested also. If we don’t get the right verdict the first time we can just keep trying them until we do. Contrary to what gun owners are always trying to scare people with, no woman needs to protect herself from rape, assault or murder and should just leave crime prevention to the Police who are properly equipped to stop any such actions and investigate any problems. Women using a gun in self-defense are guilty of murder in a state that does not have a death penalty. Any woman who does this should be put in jail because they chose to function as judge and jury and applying a penalty not allowed to the proper authorities. Those who claim that the 2nd amendment was given to us because we might someday need guns to use against an oppressive government forget that our Constitution has strong internal safeguards to protect our freedoms. Any amendment that interferes with social justice is just wrong and needs to be eliminated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papa Posted August 31, 2018 at 10:58 PM Share Posted August 31, 2018 at 10:58 PM This is not my work, I am just sharing it: Guns owners are disrespectful of authority. This recent gun sanctuary county movement is proof of this as pointed out by Rep. Willis. A failure to rely on authorities is an invariable sign of improper and overly independent attitudes. They gather together to talk about guns at gun shops, gun shows, shooting ranges, and on the internet because they have some plot going against the government. A gun owner should have no right to associate with another gun owner. To help ensure our right to safety we must insist on the government banning and seizing all guns from private hands, and forbid NRA-based criticism towards people who are only trying to help. Searching the homes of all NRA members for any guns and pro-gun literature will go a long way towards reducing crime. Common sense requires only uniformed soldiers, police, and other agents of the state have access to firearms. No person should be able to challenge this by writing to legislators or giving money to evil and racist lobbyists. If they do they should be forced in court to admit to it then put into prison. Making it mandatory that church ministers preach against guns or else they can’t get licensed will certainly encourage the church folk to have the correct belief about guns. We should hold a nation-wide vote against guns but gun-owners should be excluded from voting. They are too biased and too ignorant to be allowed to vote. This would level the playing field by letting these racists get a taste of their own medicine. People who don’t like all this prove they are on the side of the killers with the guns and should be put in jail with all the gangbangers and other gun nuts. Letting them sit in jail for a few years before they are charged will give the government plenty of time to find something wrong in their lives. Anything they say, write, or express should be held against them to prove their guilt. We should bring all of them here to Chicago to be tried with the Mayor as judge, and we should allow only mothers who have lost children to gunfire to be on the juries. Any attorney who tries to defend them should be arrested also. If we don’t get the right verdict the first time we can just keep trying them until we do. Contrary to what gun owners are always trying to scare people with, no woman needs to protect herself from rape, assault or murder and should just leave crime prevention to the Police who are properly equipped to stop any such actions and investigate any problems. Women using a gun in self-defense are guilty of murder in a state that does not have a death penalty. Any woman who does this should be put in jail because they chose to function as judge and jury and applying a penalty not allowed to the proper authorities. Those who claim that the 2nd amendment was given to us because we might someday need guns to use against an oppressive government forget that our Constitution has strong internal safeguards to protect our freedoms. Any amendment that interferes with social justice is just wrong and needs to be eliminated. It would be nice to know where this came from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted August 31, 2018 at 11:09 PM Author Share Posted August 31, 2018 at 11:09 PM It would be nice to know where this came from.yes...citation for context would be good. political satire? letter to an editor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWBH Posted August 31, 2018 at 11:38 PM Share Posted August 31, 2018 at 11:38 PM It would be nice to know where this came from.yes...citation for context would be good. political satire? letter to an editor? Wow - talk about a piece full of tyranny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lou Posted August 31, 2018 at 11:46 PM Share Posted August 31, 2018 at 11:46 PM Satire. Well written satire but satire it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.