davel501

Supreme Court likely to discard Chevron - SCOTUSblog

Right now the question is whether you sold the firearm for more than you paid for it. If you make money on the deal then you are a gun dealer.

Most of the lawyers I knew in college were political science majors.

Didn't the ISP technically provide the firearm to him? The FFL released the firearm to him at their direction.

It's really odd. One tab shows this: and another browser tab shows this: It worries me that I may have stumbled into A/B testing for what we are about to see as Illinois residents. Can't really blame them. I don't know that I would sell firearms into Illinois either right now.

NVM, it started working again. I see firearms now.

Anyone tried to find a firearm on the Brownell's site today? It's almost like they blocked firearm sales to IL.

PLCAA seems like it would preclude that remaining claim.

Quite a few of his videos are shared and referred to on this site.

Not sure where this went best. Guessing here. Articles in description of video on YouTube.

Burdensome? I think the meant incriminating.

I'd be fine if nuclear weapons were banned for the whole country, even the military. Russia and China can nuke the bajesus out of us to overcome the 2nd amendment then spend the rest of their days dying slowly. Mutually assured destruction doesn't require us to even fire a shot.

If those other companies are smart, they'll know they're next.

The law does not say that.

That FAQ is basically a word doc that they can update whenever they see fit. Last I checked, it didn't even have a change log.