Jump to content


Husband of Kansas City shootings victim sues gun sellers

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic

#1 transplant


  • Members
  • 2,485 posts
  • Joined: 14-May 13

Posted 12 April 2016 - 11:53 PM

Someone should tell him about the PLCAA.


Punish the criminals, not the people who followed the law and didn't know or have reason to know something was wrong.








#2 C0untZer0

    Contributing Member in Arrears

  • Members
  • 12,722 posts
  • Joined: 14-October 11

Posted 13 April 2016 - 05:02 AM

Walmart !


Mayor Bloomberg himself has recently turned his attention from oversize soft drinks to gun control, confirming the tendency of the Progressive to go from nanny to tyrant.
- N. A. Halkides -
“There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters” 
- Daniel Webster -
The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. 
- H. L. Mencken -
“Any government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have."


#3 Bo69


  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 333 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 14

Posted 13 April 2016 - 06:12 AM

I should sue GM for the drunk ILLEGAL immigrant that ran my mother over and killed her.

#4 jake8267


  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 394 posts
  • Joined: 14-May 13

Posted 13 April 2016 - 08:18 AM

I should sue GM for the drunk ILLEGAL immigrant that ran my mother over and killed her.


I actually think this should be the approach we take to get lawsuits like this prohibited.  The technology exists to significantly reduce instances of drunk driving as well as traveling at rates of speed well over the posted limit.  If the NRA and other gun rights groups were to start sponsoring lawsuits against vehicle manufacturers following deaths due to drunk driving or speeding/exhibition of speed we'd quickly see laws in place to prevent these lawsuits. 

#5 skinnyb82


  • Members
  • 6,540 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 12

Posted 15 April 2016 - 11:14 AM

Ironically the government shielded GM from any and all liability arising from design/manufacturing defects in all of their pre-bankruptcy vehicles (first time ever a corporation hasn't had to funnel cash into a contingency fund for payouts), thus shielding GM from pretty much any legal action arising from both known and unknown defects, yet the government would love to repeal the PLCAA and make firearm manufacturers liable for how CUSTOMERS use their products. GM can conceal fatal design defects and get away scot free but firearms manufacturers should have strict liability. Makes sense....nope. Sent from my VS986 using Tapatalk
NRA Member
SAF Member
C&R License Holder