
#91
Posted 05 November 2015 - 04:42 PM
I wonder what the Chicago tax payer is paying for this orchestra?
Registration is only a step.
The prohibition of private firearms is the goal."
Janet Reno
U.S. Attorney General
1993-12-10
"If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the governments ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees."
Bill Clinton
1993-08-12
#92
Posted 05 November 2015 - 06:27 PM
License to own? Assuming you meant carry because you don't have to "qualify" for FOID.
After the SCOTUS ruling in McDonald v. Chicago, the city enacted an ordinance the required handgun owners to take a five hour class, including live-fire at a range, in order to get a Handgun License in Chicago. Rhonda Ezell sued the city because it was illogical and irrational to REQUIRE range training in order possess a handgun in the city, but BAN RANGES in the city at the same time.
IIRC that "license " was the reason Otis went all the way to SCOTUS before he could OWN a handgun.
Before Mr. McDonald (rest his soul) won his case at the Supreme Court, everyone in Chicago was prevented from owning a handgun (legally) in Chicago unless you had a rare, grandfathered registered handgun. They stopped registering new handguns in the 1980s.
NRA Life Member - NRA Basic Pistol Instructor - NRA PPIH Instructor - NRA PPOH Instructor - IL Firearms Concealed Carry Instructor - ITWT Club Member #438
"The Supreme Court has decided that the amendment confers a right to bear arms for self-defense, which is as important outside the home as inside." -Moore v. Madigan, 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, December 11, 2012
#93
Posted 05 November 2015 - 06:43 PM
Now that Otis is in a better place not many will ever know about the WHY and the threats he endured in order to win that case.
Enjoy your rest Otis and I enjoyed our many hours of great memories spent on the bus rides to Springfield.
#94
Posted 05 November 2015 - 06:59 PM
Now that Otis is in a better place not many will ever know about the WHY and the threats he endured in order to win that case.
Enjoy your rest Otis and I enjoyed our many hours of great memories spent on the bus rides to Springfield.
What threats did he encounter? I wasn't aware of the background of his story.
-Hapless
#95
Posted 05 November 2015 - 07:33 PM
Now that Otis is in a better place not many will ever know about the WHY and the threats he endured in order to win that case.
Enjoy your rest Otis and I enjoyed our many hours of great memories spent on the bus rides to Springfield.
What threats did he encounter? I wasn't aware of the background of his story.
He stood against the machine. I could only imagine the kind of threats he endured!
Registration is only a step.
The prohibition of private firearms is the goal."
Janet Reno
U.S. Attorney General
1993-12-10
"If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the governments ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees."
Bill Clinton
1993-08-12
#96
Posted 05 November 2015 - 07:45 PM
He never mentioned about the Chiraq machine but did tell me about some of the bangers in his neighborhood.
As long as they are the only ones with guns they can do anything they want to do and that has to stop.
To me Otis will always stand as tall and courageous as any John Wayne character.
#97
Posted 05 November 2015 - 08:54 PM
Hey, at least in this case I feel I'm getting my money's worth!Listening to a city of Chicago lawyer getting her backside handed to her is like a symphony.
I wonder what the Chicago tax payer is paying for this orchestra?
#98
Posted 09 November 2015 - 01:41 AM
Hey, at least in this case I feel I'm getting my money's worth!Listening to a city of Chicago lawyer getting her backside handed to her is like a symphony.
I wonder what the Chicago tax payer is paying for this orchestra?
Agreed! Here's to a Chicago range sometime soon...
#99
Posted 20 January 2016 - 01:18 PM
#100
Posted 20 January 2016 - 01:32 PM
http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/sound/2015/sp.14-3312.14-3312_11_04_2015.mp3
Link to ILGA House Audio/Video..........Link to ILGA Senate Audio/Video ..........Advanced Digital Media Link ..........Blue Room Stream Link
RFM 3/7 Kilo Co.
;IGY6
#101
Posted 20 January 2016 - 10:58 PM
Excellent! Thank you!
#102
Posted 20 January 2016 - 11:36 PM
#103
Posted 21 January 2016 - 08:33 AM
-Hapless
#104
Posted 21 January 2016 - 11:07 AM
"Your witnesses didn't seem to have any evidence."
Ad utrumque paratus
#105
Posted 21 January 2016 - 11:46 AM
"Your witnesses didn't seem to have any evidence."
So same as the previous hearing? And a lot of "umms" and "ahhs"?
-Hapless
#106
Posted 21 January 2016 - 01:15 PM
That audio is great. Better watch out for all those kids running around inside shooting ranges.
#107
Posted 21 January 2016 - 02:09 PM
That audio is great. Better watch out for all those kids running around inside shooting ranges.
I was sitting there with Rhonda, Molly, and Swanhunter.
I though I was gonna have to bite the back of my hand to keep from busting out in laughter.
#108
Posted 21 January 2016 - 10:26 PM
Wow, a great listen. Thanks for posting.
#109
Posted 22 January 2016 - 06:29 AM
#110
Posted 22 January 2016 - 10:11 AM
Wow, I'm only about 1/4 of the way through, and that Chicago attorney is having a *really* hard time defending the law.
"One person." "One range without a gun store." "You're experts don't say that!"
Can someone identify who the various voices are? I assume the other woman is one of the judges, and the man with the more gravelly voice as well.
Edited by Mohonri, 22 January 2016 - 10:19 AM.
#111
Posted 06 March 2016 - 01:38 PM
SAF Member
C&R License Holder
#112
Posted 18 September 2016 - 03:56 PM
How long does it usually take to rule on a case like this?
It's been more than 10 months, and still counting… Just wondering out loud how much longer it will be before we get a ruling on this one.
"If you can't explain it to a six-year old, you don't understand it yourself." - Albert Einstein (paraphrased)
#113
Posted 18 September 2016 - 04:51 PM
Listening to a city of Chicago lawyer getting her backside handed to her is like a symphony.
I wonder what the Chicago tax payer is paying for this orchestra?
That reminds me - I still need to FOIA the City and ask that question for the past 20 or so years.
Despite their rallying around us at election time, honoring only 8 hours of Illinois' 40+ hour law enforcement class towards a 16 hour requirement shows the contempt that our elected officials hold us in.
#114
Posted 18 January 2017 - 05:50 PM
"If you can't explain it to a six-year old, you don't understand it yourself." - Albert Einstein (paraphrased)
#115
Posted 18 January 2017 - 06:04 PM
#116
Posted 18 January 2017 - 06:04 PM
WOW..Very nice. Sad that it took 1 yr to get a decision.
#117
Posted 18 January 2017 - 06:22 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#118
Posted 18 January 2017 - 06:26 PM
"If you can't explain it to a six-year old, you don't understand it yourself." - Albert Einstein (paraphrased)
#119
Posted 18 January 2017 - 07:07 PM
Reading the ruling is almost as fun as it was being in the courtroom hearing the arguments!
#120
Posted 18 January 2017 - 07:10 PM
Then again, we'd lose her on the CA7...

"If you can't explain it to a six-year old, you don't understand it yourself." - Albert Einstein (paraphrased)