HB 148 problem
#1
Posted 06 December 2011 - 11:29 AM
has not been convicted in Illinois or any other
6 state of (i) a felony, (ii) a misdemeanor involving the use
7 or threat of physical force or violence to any person
8 within the 10 years preceding the date of the application,
9 or (iii) a misdemeanor involving the use, possession, or
10 distribution of a controlled substance or cannabis within
11 the 10 years preceding the date of the application;
12 (e) has not been a patient in a mental institution
13 within the past 5 years, has not been adjudicated as having
14 a mental defect, or is not mentally retarded;
First off in early 2005 I had a seizure behind the wheel and was charged with a misdemeanor possession of cannabis and got a misdemeanor DUI, I was young and dumb and I have been clean since (that instance ruined my life and don't even wanna look at the stuff) If a mental patient can recover and receive a conceal carry within 5 years why is it that someone in my case cannot due the same. I understand if there is a felony or intent to distribute to wait longer as there is criminal intent but a misdemeanor, come on at lest put it on par with mental recovery time at 5 years, I have lots of paperwork pertaining to my recovery as well. Right now there are places in IL that have decriminalized under 10 grams.
Can any one help with this or am I stuck waiting till 2015 if this passes in May?
#2
Posted 06 December 2011 - 11:49 AM
-Thomas Jefferson-
Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-
#3
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:19 PM
I assume we get RTC
#4
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:30 PM
mficare, on 06 December 2011 - 11:29 AM, said:
has not been convicted in Illinois or any other
6 state of (i) a felony, (ii) a misdemeanor involving the use
7 or threat of physical force or violence to any person
8 within the 10 years preceding the date of the application,
9 or (iii) a misdemeanor involving the use, possession, or
10 distribution of a controlled substance or cannabis within
11 the 10 years preceding the date of the application;
12 (e) has not been a patient in a mental institution
13 within the past 5 years, has not been adjudicated as having
14 a mental defect, or is not mentally retarded;
First off in early 2005 I had a seizure behind the wheel and was charged with a misdemeanor possession of cannabis and got a misdemeanor DUI, I was young and dumb and I have been clean since (that instance ruined my life and don't even wanna look at the stuff) If a mental patient can recover and receive a conceal carry within 5 years why is it that someone in my case cannot due the same. I understand if there is a felony or intent to distribute to wait longer as there is criminal intent but a misdemeanor, come on at lest put it on par with mental recovery time at 5 years, I have lots of paperwork pertaining to my recovery as well. Right now there are places in IL that have decriminalized under 10 grams.
Can any one help with this or am I stuck waiting till 2015 if this passes in May?
I haven't confirmed, but it is my understanding that the wording in HB-148 is identical to the wording in the FOID act, so if you can get a FOID, you can get the as yet mythical IL Carry license (at least with respect to this aspect of the requirements).
Quote
#6
Posted 06 December 2011 - 12:37 PM
#7
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:03 PM
PPK, on 06 December 2011 - 12:37 PM, said:
#8
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:13 PM
Federal Farmer, on 06 December 2011 - 12:30 PM, said:
mficare, on 06 December 2011 - 11:29 AM, said:
has not been convicted in Illinois or any other
6 state of (i) a felony, (ii) a misdemeanor involving the use
7 or threat of physical force or violence to any person
8 within the 10 years preceding the date of the application,
9 or (iii) a misdemeanor involving the use, possession, or
10 distribution of a controlled substance or cannabis within
11 the 10 years preceding the date of the application;
12 (e) has not been a patient in a mental institution
13 within the past 5 years, has not been adjudicated as having
14 a mental defect, or is not mentally retarded;
First off in early 2005 I had a seizure behind the wheel and was charged with a misdemeanor possession of cannabis and got a misdemeanor DUI, I was young and dumb and I have been clean since (that instance ruined my life and don't even wanna look at the stuff) If a mental patient can recover and receive a conceal carry within 5 years why is it that someone in my case cannot due the same. I understand if there is a felony or intent to distribute to wait longer as there is criminal intent but a misdemeanor, come on at lest put it on par with mental recovery time at 5 years, I have lots of paperwork pertaining to my recovery as well. Right now there are places in IL that have decriminalized under 10 grams.
Can any one help with this or am I stuck waiting till 2015 if this passes in May?
I haven't confirmed, but it is my understanding that the wording in HB-148 is identical to the wording in the FOID act, so if you can get a FOID, you can get the as yet mythical IL Carry license (at least with respect to this aspect of the requirements).
I looked at the FOID act...and mannnn is it long..the only thing that I can see about a misdemeanor is if the FOID holder is under the age of 21 and it states that you cannot be addicted to narcotics and basically the same thing about a mental disorder... EDIT: (430 ILCS 65/10) (from Ch. 38, par. 83‑10) Sec. 10. (a) talks about the cannabis control act of a class 2 felony or higher
Edited by mficare, 06 December 2011 - 01:27 PM.
#9
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:17 PM
mficare, on 06 December 2011 - 01:03 PM, said:
PPK, on 06 December 2011 - 12:37 PM, said:
You always petition the court to have the records expunged.
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1776
Life Member NRA, ISRA, CCRKBA & SAF
#10
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:28 PM
lockman, on 06 December 2011 - 01:17 PM, said:
mficare, on 06 December 2011 - 01:03 PM, said:
PPK, on 06 December 2011 - 12:37 PM, said:
You always petition the court to have the records expunged.
#11
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:45 PM
-Thomas Jefferson-
Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-
#12
Posted 06 December 2011 - 01:57 PM
#13
#14
Posted 06 December 2011 - 06:15 PM
Mental disease is ....a disease, curable by medication and therapy. It can and does happen to anyone and a period of remission is prima facie proof that it is cured..
An arrest and conviction for a misdemeanor offense is wilful illegal misconduct. You made a choice, it wasn't inflicted. A period without a subsequent arrest and conviction for an additional offense is hardly proof of being cured. It may be but it may alsobe just a demonstrated proof that you have gotten smarter and haven't been caught again.
A conviction is a conviction. You can't get it expunged without being pardoned by the Governor for the offense. But since it wasn't a felony, I don't think you can pursue that course either.
2015 isn't that far away.
Edited by BudMan5, 06 December 2011 - 06:21 PM.
Seriously, the legalization of dueling would end political pandering and solve political corruption in the State
ITWT Club Member 001
ONE STATE- ONE LAW
#15
Posted 06 December 2011 - 06:37 PM
Quote
It is if you are being mugged.
Edited by riversludge, 06 December 2011 - 06:38 PM.
#16
Posted 06 December 2011 - 08:14 PM
BudMan5, on 06 December 2011 - 06:15 PM, said:
Mental disease is ....a disease, curable by medication and therapy. It can and does happen to anyone and a period of remission is prima facie proof that it is cured..
An arrest and conviction for a misdemeanor offense is wilful illegal misconduct. You made a choice, it wasn't inflicted. A period without a subsequent arrest and conviction for an additional offense is hardly proof of being cured. It may be but it may alsobe just a demonstrated proof that you have gotten smarter and haven't been caught again.
A conviction is a conviction. You can't get it expunged without being pardoned by the Governor for the offense. But since it wasn't a felony, I don't think you can pursue that course either.
2015 isn't that far away.
#19
Posted 08 December 2011 - 12:55 PM
DM
#20
Posted 08 December 2011 - 01:28 PM
It could be a lot worse, NJ, MA, NY, CA and a few other states are pretty much no-carry states but at least I can have my AR's AK's and hi-cap mags.
#21
Posted 08 December 2011 - 01:57 PM
Illinois is getting their bums kicked in the courts
#22
Posted 08 December 2011 - 02:10 PM
samy12386, on 06 December 2011 - 01:57 PM, said:
What does Ron Paul have to do with it?
-Thomas Jefferson-
Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-
#23
Posted 08 December 2011 - 03:20 PM
BudMan5, on 06 December 2011 - 06:15 PM, said:
Mental disease is ....a disease, curable by medication and therapy. It can and does happen to anyone and a period of remission is prima facie proof that it is cured..
An arrest and conviction for a misdemeanor offense is wilful illegal misconduct. You made a choice, it wasn't inflicted. A period without a subsequent arrest and conviction for an additional offense is hardly proof of being cured. It may be but it may alsobe just a demonstrated proof that you have gotten smarter and haven't been caught again.
A conviction is a conviction. You can't get it expunged without being pardoned by the Governor for the offense. But since it wasn't a felony, I don't think you can pursue that course either.
2015 isn't that far away.
Quote
People with qualifying arrests and convictions may petition the court of their sentencing county to expunge or seal their records. We can answer your questions regarding eligibility for expungement and sealing. We also have an information packet explaining the process and requirements for expunging/sealing of records. However, the Office of the State Appellate Defender cannot represent you on a petition to expunge or seal our records. To contact us with questions, or to request a copy of the information packet, you may email, call or write us. Be sure to include your mailing address if requesting a packet, as the packet cannnot be emailed. Forms and information may also be downloaded via the links below.
If your conviction is expunged you can legally omit information on any application requesting information about arrest or convictions related to the expunged conviction.
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1776
Life Member NRA, ISRA, CCRKBA & SAF
#24
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:16 PM
#25
Posted 08 December 2011 - 08:31 PM
kermit315, on 08 December 2011 - 07:16 PM, said:
I think that only domestic violence/forcible felony will disqualify you. Don't quote me on that one.
~"An invasion of mainland America is unwise. Behind every blade of grass a rifle would await us"
-Yamamoto Isoroku
Yes. I'm predicting that Chicago/Cook county will be sold out in order to get "shall issue".
#26
Posted 09 December 2011 - 03:05 AM
fubarud, on 08 December 2011 - 01:28 PM, said:
It could be a lot worse, NJ, MA, NY, CA and a few other states are pretty much no-carry states but at least I can have my AR's AK's and hi-cap mags.
On a side note: If Illinois gets CC and goes "may issue", do you think having purchased AR's would keep you from being considered for a CCP?
Thanks in advance.
#27
Posted 09 December 2011 - 03:33 AM
willxjcherokee, on 08 December 2011 - 01:57 PM, said:
Illinois is getting their bums kicked in the courts
It's as likely as shall issue if at all. I'm almost willing to wait until there is enough of a majority to make shall issue a state constitutional amendment. The Chicago machine must be dealt out of the equation no matter how it goes.
May issue is just opening the door for all levels of corruption in Chicago and Cook county.
Shall/must issue or nothing.
~"An invasion of mainland America is unwise. Behind every blade of grass a rifle would await us"
-Yamamoto Isoroku
Yes. I'm predicting that Chicago/Cook county will be sold out in order to get "shall issue".
#28
Posted 09 December 2011 - 09:39 AM
cyclist, on 09 December 2011 - 03:05 AM, said:
fubarud, on 08 December 2011 - 01:28 PM, said:
It could be a lot worse, NJ, MA, NY, CA and a few other states are pretty much no-carry states but at least I can have my AR's AK's and hi-cap mags.
On a side note: If Illinois gets CC and goes "may issue", do you think having purchased AR's would keep you from being considered for a CCP?
Thanks in advance.
what would owning an AR have to do with the price of tea in China when it comes to getting a CCP? ????
#29
Posted 09 December 2011 - 11:15 AM
-Thomas Jefferson-
Now two flags fly above my land that really sum up how I feel. One is the colors that fly high and proud the red, the white, the blue. The other ones got a rattle snake with a simple statement made, don't tread on me, is what it says and I'll take that to my grave
-Aaron Lewis-
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











