Molly B. Posted June 21, 2013 at 07:46 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 07:46 PM Updates From This Past Week's Attempts to Ban Semi-Auto FirearmsBANNOCKBURN - NO BANBARTLETT - NO BANBATAVIA -NO BANBERWYN - NO BANBUFFALO GROVE -Banned machine guns, still waiting on language concerning Cook Co. ban.Calumet Park??Chicago - Passed BanClarendon Hills-NO BANCountry Club Hills - Vote deferred, indications at meeting that ban will not pass.Darien - NO BANDeerfield - NO BAN passed a "safe storage/transportation ordinance - modified to include a ban - currently appealed to IL Supreme Court.Dolton - passed banEvanston- Passed modifed ban Evergreen Park - NO BANFlossmoor - NO BANGurnee -NO BANHainesville - NO BAN!Hanover Park - NO BAN!Highland Park - BAN PASSED - ordinance text hereHomewood - AWB repealed Island Lake - NO BAN.Lake Forest - NO BAN - motion remained tabledLake Zurich - NO BAN Lincolnwood - NO BAN!Marengo- NO BANMelrose Park - BAN PASSEDMettawa - NO BAN -Morton Grove- transportation/safe storage??North Chicago - BAN PASSEDOrland Park - NO BANOswego- NO BANPark Ridge - NO BANRichmond - NO BANRiver Forest - NO BAN Riverdale - passed banSkokie - BAN PASSEDSt.Charles - NO BANSteger -NO BANStickney - NO BanUniversity Park - NO BAN safe storage ordinance passed - listed firearms must be locked or locked up when not being carried by lawfully authorized person - ordinance text.Waukegan - NO BANWest Chicago - NO BANWestern Springs - NO BAN Westmont - NO BANWheeling - NO BANWinnetka - NO Ban - passed safe storage/transportation ordinance - transportation same as state law and listed firearms must be locked or locked up when lawfully authorized person (FOID holder?) not around. ZION - NO BAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livewire18 Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:11 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:11 PM Thanks for the update Molly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:14 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:14 PM Great update Molly but I think you mistitled the thread. It should read, Smackdown on attempts to ban... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C0untZer0 Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:48 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:48 PM safe storage/transportation ordinance which would require certain firearms to be locked at all times. That was part of DC's law and spelled out in Dick Heller's complaint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cm.stites Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:49 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 08:49 PM safe storage/transportation ordinance which would require certain firearms to be locked at all times. That was part of DC's law and spelled out in Dick Heller's complaint.theres exceptions built in basically the foid holder has to be home for it to be unlocked or an "authorized" user Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicagoSigFan Posted June 21, 2013 at 09:32 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 09:32 PM This is why we needed total preemption. Now some jurisdictions may pass AWBs, others may not, some may pass transportation regs, etc. Now when I drive to the range in Wisconsin that I use to shoot my ARs, I'll have to check the laws of every town I pass through. Lovely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cm.stites Posted June 21, 2013 at 09:40 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 09:40 PM actually if you go back and read 183 the transportation of ALL firearms is preempted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xd9subcompact Posted June 21, 2013 at 09:56 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 09:56 PM Hopefully, what is happening is the ones that are deferring are looking for someone else to jump into the pool first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangrel Posted June 21, 2013 at 10:33 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 10:33 PM So I never did see anyone take my bet of a steak dinner on the over/under for number of communities enacting an AWB before the window closes. I set the line at 7, and I am most certainly taking the under. Any takers? As I have said all along, if these municipalities had the support to pass an AWB, what's been stopping them until now? Now, some of the nuts have put their proposals forward, only to discuss over that they don't have the support to get it done. Shocking. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoktorPaimon Posted June 21, 2013 at 10:45 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 10:45 PM (edited) This is why we needed total preemption. Now some jurisdictions may pass AWBs, others may not, some may pass transportation regs, etc. Now when I drive to the range in Wisconsin that I use to shoot my ARs, I'll have to check the laws of every town I pass through. Lovely. Only if you plan on complying with the harassment of petty bureaucrats and their impotent little city councils. We've fine tradition of civil disobedience in this country, if the antis keep pushing their luck they're liable to find out what it looks like when you turn a community of people built on individualism and small arms into reflexive scofflaws. The gun culture is surprisingly law abiding, I'm almost eager to see what we look like when we've got enough precedent under our belts to get defiant. Edited June 21, 2013 at 10:46 PM by DoktorPaimon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WindyCityGuy Posted June 21, 2013 at 11:09 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 11:09 PM So I never did see anyone take my bet of a steak dinner on the over/under for number of communities enacting an AWB before the window closes. I set the line at 7, and I am most certainly taking the under. Any takers? As I have said all along, if these municipalities had the support to pass an AWB, what's been stopping them until now? Now, some of the nuts have put their proposals forward, only to discuss over that they don't have the support to get it done. Shocking. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangrel Posted June 21, 2013 at 11:43 PM Share Posted June 21, 2013 at 11:43 PM So I never did see anyone take my bet of a steak dinner on the over/under for number of communities enacting an AWB before the window closes. I set the line at 7, and I am most certainly taking the under. Any takers? As I have said all along, if these municipalities had the support to pass an AWB, what's been stopping them until now? Now, some of the nuts have put their proposals forward, only to discuss over that they don't have the support to get it done. Shocking. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2 Over I like NY strip, medium...preferably with some kind of a horseradish crust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C0untZer0 Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:43 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:43 AM Is it just coincidence that so many towns are meeting on the 24th? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cm.stites Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:44 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:44 AM most towns either meet the first and third mondays or tuesdays of each month. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neumann Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:59 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:59 AM (edited) If I read HB183 correctly, the state preempts all regulations concerning transportation of all firearms, including long guns. At present, the minimum standard is unloaded and totally enclosed (or broken down, or inaccessible). Edited June 24, 2013 at 02:00 AM by Neumann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sigma Posted June 24, 2013 at 02:01 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 02:01 AM I will try to attend one that is close to my city. If your city isnt listed they will probably get jealous of a nearby city and propose an AWB as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
03rev Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:24 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:24 AM most towns either meet the first and third mondays or tuesdays of each month. Moline is a bunch of over achievers they meet every week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cm.stites Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:38 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:38 AM haha so do alot of towns but the second and 4th weeks are considered study sessions and no action can be taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylok Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:39 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:39 AM It's great to see these people in scramble mode! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:43 AM Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 03:43 AM I wish they were scrambling for something else - they're killing me trying to keep up with all of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GAS3987 Posted June 24, 2013 at 10:45 AM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 10:45 AM This is why we needed total preemption. Now some jurisdictions may pass AWBs, others may not, some may pass transportation regs, etc. Now when I drive to the range in Wisconsin that I use to shoot my ARs, I'll have to check the laws of every town I pass through. Lovely. Only if you plan on complying with the harassment of petty bureaucrats and their impotent little city councils. We've fine tradition of civil disobedience in this country, if the antis keep pushing their luck they're liable to find out what it looks like when you turn a community of people built on individualism and small arms into reflexive scofflaws. The gun culture is surprisingly law abiding, I'm almost eager to see what we look like when we've got enough precedent under our belts to get defiant. Nearly all of the lawful gun owners I have ever known, have been amongst the most honest and great to work with people. I too would be intrigued by the looks of defiance today. If the politicians/antis don't read up on their history, they may get re-educated on what happened in 1775. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigJim Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:25 PM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:25 PM I wish they were scrambling for something else - they're killing me trying to keep up with all of them.That's their plan. They intend to overwhelm us with AWBs to the point we just throw our hands up and say screw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:44 PM Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:44 PM I wish they were scrambling for something else - they're killing me trying to keep up with all of them.That's their plan. They intend to overwhelm us with AWBs to the point we just throw our hands up and say screw it. LOL, they don't know who they're messing with! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylok Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:46 PM Share Posted June 24, 2013 at 01:46 PM I wish they were scrambling for something else - they're killing me trying to keep up with all of them.And they know that, it's all by design. You guys are doing good though and we're going to cost all these little towns a fortune when we sue their butts off and win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:07 PM Author Share Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:07 PM updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:13 PM Share Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:13 PM Great update Molly but I think you mistitled the thread. It should read, Smackdown on attempts to ban...Not a total smack down, two bans did pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:15 PM Share Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:15 PM This is why we needed total preemption. Now some jurisdictions may pass AWBs, others may not, some may pass transportation regs, etc. Now when I drive to the range in Wisconsin that I use to shoot my ARs, I'll have to check the laws of every town I pass through. Lovely.I'm going to start transporting my AR's broken down in addition to being locked. Because like you, when driving to WI ranges, I drive straight through highland park. Maybe I will do the same with my pistols just in case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:17 PM Share Posted June 25, 2013 at 03:17 PM Hopefully, what is happening is the ones that are deferring are looking for someone else to jump into the pool first.Well, two jumped in. Now what? We have to PACK the next meetings and ramp up our letter writing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talonap Posted June 25, 2013 at 05:00 PM Share Posted June 25, 2013 at 05:00 PM This is why we needed total preemption. Now some jurisdictions may pass AWBs, others may not, some may pass transportation regs, etc. Now when I drive to the range in Wisconsin that I use to shoot my ARs, I'll have to check the laws of every town I pass through. Lovely.I'm going to start transporting my AR's broken down in addition to being locked. Because like you, when driving to WI ranges, I drive straight through highland park. Maybe I will do the same with my pistols just in case. Again. Once 183 is law, it preempts transportation of ALL FIREARMS for FOID holders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlphaKoncepts aka CGS Posted June 25, 2013 at 05:14 PM Share Posted June 25, 2013 at 05:14 PM A) It's not law yet. I'd have to prove in court after being arrested and weapons confiscated that I am in the right, and even when I win I will be out thousands of dollars in legal fees. C) IF quinn signs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now