InterestedBystander Posted January 17, 2020 at 01:32 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 01:32 AM HB4108 FIREARM OWNERS ID-18 YEARS http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4108&GAID=15&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=123045&SessionID=108&GA=101 Synopsis As IntroducedAmends the Firearm Owners Identification Card Act. Lowers the age in which a person may apply for a Firearm Owner's Identification Card without parental or legal guardian consent from 21 years of age to 18 years of age. Provides that an applicant who is 18 (rather than 21) years of age or older seeking a religious exemption to the photograph requirement must furnish with the application an approved copy of United States Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Form 4029. HB4110 FIREARMS-JUDICIAL&PROSECUTORS http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4110&GAID=15&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=123047&SessionID=108&GA=101 Synopsis As IntroducedAmends the Firearm Concealed Carry Act. Permits certain judicial officers, the Attorney General, assistant Attorneys General, State's Attorneys and assistant State's Attorneys, some with specified written consent, to carry a concealed firearm in any building, parking area, or portion of a building under the control of an officer of the executive or legislative branch of government, any building designated for matters before a circuit court, appellate court, or the Supreme Court, or any building or portion of a building under the control of the Supreme Court and any building or portion of a building under the control of a unit of local government. HB4113 FIREARMS-NON RESIDENT MILITARY http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4113&GAID=15&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=123050&SessionID=108&GA=101 Synopsis As IntroducedAmends the Firearm Concealed Carry Act. Provides that notwithstanding whether the laws of the state or territory where the non-resident resides related to firearm ownership, possession, and carrying are substantially similar to the requirements to obtain a license under the Act, the Illinois State Police shall, no later than 120 days after the effective date of the amendatory Act, allow for a non-resident license application if the applicant is an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States who is stationed in the State and lives in the State. Provides that a non-resident active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States who is stationed in the State and lives in the State shall apply to the Illinois State Police and must meet all of the qualifications under the Act and shall submit: (1) the application and documentation required and the applicable fee; (2) a photocopy of a valid military identification card or Official Proof of Service Letter; and (3) a photocopy of permanent change-of-station orders to an assignment in the State. Provides for emergency rulemaking to implement the amendatory Act. Establishes fees. Makes conforming changes to the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act. Effective immediately. HB4115 FIREARM DEALERS-FEE AMOUNTS http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4115&GAID=15&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=123053&SessionID=108&GA=101 Synopsis As IntroducedAmends the Firearm Dealer License Certification Act. Provides that the fee amount for a certified licensee shall be based upon the number of firearms sold per year. Provides that if the certified licensee sells less than 150,000 firearms per year, the fee is $200. Provides that if the certified licensee sells 150,000 to 500,000 firearms per year, the fee is $500. Provides that if the certified licensee sells over 500,000 firearms per year, the fee is $1,000. HB4116 FIREARM DEALER-REPEAL http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4116&GAID=15&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=123054&SessionID=108&GA=101 Synopsis As IntroducedRepeals the Firearm Dealer License Certification Act. Makes conforming changes to the State Finance Act. Effective immediately. HB4126 CONCEAL CARRY-FEES-VET&RET LAW http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4126&GAID=15&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=123068&SessionID=108&GA=101 Synopsis As IntroducedAmends the Firearm Concealed Carry Act. Provides that the fees for a new and renewal concealed carry license of an applicant who is a veteran or a qualified retired law enforcement officer shall be 50% of the fees for other applicants. Defines "qualified retired law enforcement officer" and "veteran". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papa Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:07 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:07 AM I don't like special carve outs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawman Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:17 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:17 AM The carve outs are a good start. Baby steps. But I don't see any of these going anywhere given the current make up of the legislature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:35 AM Author Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:35 AM The carve outs are a good start. Baby steps. But I don't see any of these going anywhere given the current make up of the legislature.Me either. At best, maybe for the 2 bills on vets or non resident military. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyk101 Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:38 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:38 AM As far as HB4216, I can see it being a plus for Veterans that want concealed carry but most for retired LEO's, there is little benefit to obtaining an Illinois CCL. Just about all retired LEO's in Illinois will participate in the IROCC program to obtain CCL privileges as they are now covered under HR218, otherwise known as LEOSA. It gives 50 state carry privileges. The only downside when compared to the Illinois CCL is that you must qualify every year and pay a fee of $75 if you want to qualify with a semi auto or revolver, or $100 if you want to get qualified to carry both. In the end, it ends up around the same cost but much more beneficial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt guy Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:47 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 02:47 AM Somthe ASA’s etc want to protect themselves in places they don’t want us to protect ourselves ? Got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:38 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:38 AM Thank you! Added to the list! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:38 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:38 AM The carve outs are a good start. Baby steps. But I don't see any of these going anywhere given the current make up of the legislature. Only if the carve out is for you, in this state the only way that carve out gets expanded to all is in the courts, it's never really a baby step to progress in this state it remains just a small carve out until a court intervenes and removes all special treatment and different applicable classes to exercising rights. In fact I would argue carve outs hurt the fight as many 'Fudds' get their candy and walk away from the fight, we see this all too often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:47 AM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:47 AM The carve outs are a good start. Baby steps. But I don't see any of these going anywhere given the current make up of the legislature. Only if the carve out is for you, in this state the only way that carve out gets expanded to all is in the courts, it's never really a baby step to progress in this state it remains just a small carve out until a court intervenes and removes all special treatment and different applicable classes to exercising rights. In fact I would argue carve outs hurt the fight as many 'Fudds' get their candy and walk away from the fight, we see this all too often. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sol-Invictus Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:13 PM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 04:13 PM No special privileges for anyone including retired LEOs, period. Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted January 17, 2020 at 08:18 PM Share Posted January 17, 2020 at 08:18 PM No special privileges for anyone including retired LEOs, period. Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk Exactly, imagine how far nationwide reciprocal and even carry itself would be if police didn't and never got special privileges taking them out of the fight (or worse they turn against everyone else's rights) because they got theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.