Raw Power Posted October 25, 2020 at 01:23 PM Share Posted October 25, 2020 at 01:23 PM Last month, the Hancock County Circuit Court Ordered the Hancock County Sheriff to provide the names of people who purchased guns at the Sheriff's gun sale. We asked for the records so we could determine if any Sheriff's Department employees purchased any guns from the department (55 ILCS 5/3-6026), and because any sales by a local Sheriff or City Police Department of confiscated firearms violates state law.This FOIA lawsuit was filed in 2019 after their refusal to provide the information pursuant to a FOIA request.The Sheriff argued that Illinois state law prohibited him from releasing names of FOID card holders, and Iowa residents should be afforded the same protections as Illinois residents. We argued that we did not request the names of FOID card holders, we requested the names of the people who purchased guns sold by the Sheriff's Department. Illinois law permits, possession of firearms by non-FOID card holders in certain circumstances; 430 ILCS 65/2© - which means that of the names provided, does not necessarily mean they all have FOID cards. https://edgarcountywatchdogs.com/2020/10/court-orders-hancock-county-sheriff-to-hand-over-names-of-gun-purchasers/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raw Power Posted October 25, 2020 at 02:05 PM Author Share Posted October 25, 2020 at 02:05 PM Last month, the Hancock County Circuit Court Ordered the Hancock County Sheriff to provide the names of people who purchased guns at the Sheriff's gun sale. We asked for the records so we could determine if any Sheriff's Department employees purchased any guns from the department (55 ILCS 5/3-6026), and because any sales by a local Sheriff or City Police Department of confiscated firearms violates state law. This FOIA lawsuit was filed in 2019 after their refusal to provide the information pursuant to a FOIA request. The Sheriff argued that Illinois state law prohibited him from releasing names of FOID card holders, and Iowa residents should be afforded the same protections as Illinois residents. We argued that we did not request the names of FOID card holders, we requested the names of the people who purchased guns sold by the Sheriff's Department. Illinois law permits, possession of firearms by non-FOID card holders in certain circumstances; 430 ILCS 65/2© - which means that of the names provided, does not necessarily mean they all have FOID cards. https://edgarcountywatchdogs.com/2020/10/court-orders-hancock-county-sheriff-to-hand-over-names-of-gun-purchasers/ The people who bought guns from an Illinois Sheriff's gun sale didn't need some sort of ID?If that ID said they were from Illinois they didn't need a FOID card?There is something seriously wrong with this situation. More than one thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101abn Posted October 25, 2020 at 02:11 PM Share Posted October 25, 2020 at 02:11 PM The people who bought guns from an Illinois Sheriff's gun sale didn't need some sort of ID? If that ID said they were from Illinois they didn't need a FOID card? There is something seriously wrong with this situation. How did you come to that conclusion. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101abn Posted October 25, 2020 at 02:33 PM Share Posted October 25, 2020 at 02:33 PM “ The Sheriff argued that Illinois state law prohibited him from releasing names of FOID card holders, and Iowa residents should be afforded the same protections as Illinois residents “ Unless you are associated with the Hancock county sherifs department and have first hand knowledge of how the sale was conducted you should not be making assumptions. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiet Observer Posted October 25, 2020 at 03:06 PM Share Posted October 25, 2020 at 03:06 PM So what gives this so-called watchdog group the need to know the name of every single person who bought a gun at the sale? As long as the sheriff can show that money was collected from the sale of each firearm, what difference does it make? Maybe some deputy knew that a "SuperBlaster 77" was available before the general public knew. If they paid the price, the sheriff's department still got the money. At least the guns were not melted down, as would happen in a lot of municipalities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiet Observer Posted October 25, 2020 at 07:45 PM Share Posted October 25, 2020 at 07:45 PM Mack G, My comments were to the group in general, and not in response to your comment. I was already typing when your comments above mine were posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikew Posted October 25, 2020 at 07:48 PM Share Posted October 25, 2020 at 07:48 PM The Watchdogs have usually been in the corner of the gun owner. What this about Iowa residents? Anyone know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.