spanishjames Posted September 3, 2019 at 09:11 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 09:11 PM If you like the PT92, by all means get one.However speaking as a former PT92 owner, I would spend the extra money and buy the Beretta if that is the type on gun you are set on.I agree. For about $100 more, you get something that will hold it's value over the long run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted September 3, 2019 at 10:01 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 10:01 PM Or get a Beretta 92 S got like $300 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranger Posted September 3, 2019 at 10:23 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 10:23 PM To those who preemptively purchase 10 round magazines instead of standard capacity, how would you feel if they don't ban standard capacity mags? How will you feel if they arbitrarily decide 9 round mags are ok; but 10 rounders are evil and outlawed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinmcc Posted September 3, 2019 at 11:11 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 11:11 PM Lots of talk about magazine limits. Would you buy a hi cap pistol, on the chance that it could soon be outlawed? Or if you have a hi cap pistol, could you use 10 round magazines in it if they outlawed double-stack magazines? The reason I ask is I've got my eye on a Taurus PT 92. I don't want to buy it if I won't be able to use it.Thanks What is a Hi Cap pistol? You mean Hi Point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted September 4, 2019 at 01:17 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 01:17 AM To those who preemptively purchase 10 round magazines instead of standard capacity, how would you feel if they don't ban standard capacity mags? How will you feel if they arbitrarily decide 9 round mags are ok; but 10 rounders are evil and outlawed?Like they did in NY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriumphRider Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:01 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:01 AM My Sigs hold 16 rounds (9mm). That's a Standard Load for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS1 Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:21 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:21 AM To those who preemptively purchase 10 round magazines instead of standard capacity, how would you feel if they don't ban standard capacity mags? How will you feel if they arbitrarily decide 9 round mags are ok; but 10 rounders are evil and outlawed?I use them for training. Don't need more than 10 rounds for many reload drills and I'd rather drop the 10 rounders on the ground anyway. If they make 9 round mags "standard", I'll cross that bridge when we come to it. The reason 10 rounders are a viable purchase now is that many municipalities and even some states have the 10 round limit. Not that I'm planning a trip to any of them but let's face it, we buy a lot of gun stuff. Might as well have options, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crufflesmuth Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:22 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:22 AM It's never a bad time to buy a gun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriumphRider Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:51 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:51 AM I keep thinking of the term - "I Will Not Comply". If 300,000,000 people said it, meant it, and LIVED it, what would the Gov't do? It really is simple - Do NOT bow down to government Tyranny. That is Exactly why the US Constitution was written. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomKoz Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:59 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:59 AM Well, was my comment wrong in any way? Do you disagree?Code of Conduct1. Advocating or promoting illegal activity is not allowed.Aren’t SANCTUARY COUNTIES technically “illegal” and do YOU not advocate or promote it ??? Just asking !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted September 4, 2019 at 10:38 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 10:38 AM Arent SANCTUARY COUNTIES technically illegal and do YOU not advocate or promote it ??? Just asking !! Prosecutors are given broad discretion when deciding who and what to prosecute. There's nothing illegal about encouraging them to use that discretion in a way we support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanc Posted September 4, 2019 at 02:48 PM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 02:48 PM At least 1 trip a year to a limited capacity state/city, so I keep my Clinton mags for those road trips. Those mags also get used at the range. It does irritate the poop out of me when I have to load them up for those road trips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeekDad Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:24 PM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:24 PM My Sigs hold 16 rounds (9mm). That's a Standard Load for them. This whole argument over what defines "High Capacity" is such crap. 9mm? .40? .45? .357Sig? .380? Standard Capacity for my M&P 9 Full size is 17 rounds. Standard Capacity for a Shield 9mm is 7 or 8. Standard Capacity for a Glock 19 is 15. Standard Capacity for a .45 ACP 1911 is 7 or 8. Standard Capacity for a FN509 is 17. Standard Capacity for a SIG P320X is 17. So what's "High Capacity" then? 9? 10? 12? 15? 16? 17? Such.... Utter.... Crap.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriumphRider Posted September 5, 2019 at 02:49 AM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 02:49 AM My Sigs hold 16 rounds (9mm). That's a Standard Load for them. This whole argument over what defines "High Capacity" is such crap. 9mm? .40? .45? .357Sig? .380? Standard Capacity for my M&P 9 Full size is 17 rounds. Standard Capacity for a Shield 9mm is 7 or 8. Standard Capacity for a Glock 19 is 15. Standard Capacity for a .45 ACP 1911 is 7 or 8. Standard Capacity for a FN509 is 17. Standard Capacity for a SIG P320X is 17. So what's "High Capacity" then? 9? 10? 12? 15? 16? 17? Such.... Utter.... Crap.... What are you promoting with your post? Are you FOR limiting a standard magazine capability, or against it? I'm not attacking you, just looking for claritty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mauserme Posted September 5, 2019 at 02:57 AM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 02:57 AM What are you promoting with your post? Are you FOR limiting a standard magazine capability, or against it? I'm not attacking you, just looking for claritty. I don't think he's promoting anything. He's pointing out the absurdity of trying to logically define "high capacity" v "standard capacity". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:19 AM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:19 AM What are you promoting with your post? Are you FOR limiting a standard magazine capability, or against it? I'm not attacking you, just looking for claritty.I don't think he's promoting anything. He's pointing out the absurdity of trying to logically define "high capacity" v "standard capacity". Let's just be honest, "high capacity" and "standard capacity" are fluid made up definition anti-gun buzzwords, no different than "assault rifle" or "assalt weapon" they will change the definition at will to fit their current agenda, thus I flat out refuse to even acknowledge any definition applied to these made up anti-gun buzzwords. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomKoz Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:47 AM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:47 AM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
357 Posted September 5, 2019 at 05:20 AM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 05:20 AM What are you promoting with your post? Are you FOR limiting a standard magazine capability, or against it? I'm not attacking you, just looking for claritty. I don't think he's promoting anything. He's pointing out the absurdity of trying to logically define "high capacity" v "standard capacity". Let's just be honest, "high capacity" and "standard capacity" are fluid made up definition anti-gun buzzwords, no different than "assault rifle" or "assalt weapon" they will change the definition at will to fit their current agenda, thus I flat out refuse to even acknowledge any definition applied to these made up anti-gun buzzwords.Bingo. I'm surprised they don't call them assault magazines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeekDad Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:44 PM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:44 PM What are you promoting with your post? Are you FOR limiting a standard magazine capability, or against it? I'm not attacking you, just looking for claritty.I don't think he's promoting anything. He's pointing out the absurdity of trying to logically define "high capacity" v "standard capacity". Yep! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeekDad Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:49 PM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 03:49 PM Bingo. I'm surprised they don't call them assault magazines. Let's not give them any ideas.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
357 Posted September 5, 2019 at 05:08 PM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 05:08 PM Bingo. I'm surprised they don't call them assault magazines. Let's not give them any ideas.. That's what I thought too lol. They think they're slick and can ban anything by adding assault in front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted September 5, 2019 at 08:42 PM Share Posted September 5, 2019 at 08:42 PM Bingo. I'm surprised they don't call them assault magazines. Let's not give them any ideas.. That's what I thought too lol. They think they're slick and can ban anything by adding assault in front. They have already lumped magazines and a plethora of other gun related items into their new 'weapons of war' buzzwords. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTHunter Posted September 6, 2019 at 05:16 PM Share Posted September 6, 2019 at 05:16 PM Years ago, when I got my 10/22, I also got some of Ram-Line's 30 & 50 rd. magazines. More recently, I bought a Keltec PMR-30 and I'm considering the CMR-30 rifle to go with it. I already have a Marlin bolt-action .22 Mag rifle but it is a bolt-action. The two Keltecs are both semis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papa Posted September 6, 2019 at 05:54 PM Share Posted September 6, 2019 at 05:54 PM Would I buy an over 10 round capacity firearm ? Only if I wanted one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max503 Posted September 8, 2019 at 08:23 PM Author Share Posted September 8, 2019 at 08:23 PM My Sigs hold 16 rounds (9mm). That's a Standard Load for them. This whole argument over what defines "High Capacity" is such crap. 9mm? .40? .45? .357Sig? .380? Standard Capacity for my M&P 9 Full size is 17 rounds. Standard Capacity for a Shield 9mm is 7 or 8. Standard Capacity for a Glock 19 is 15. Standard Capacity for a .45 ACP 1911 is 7 or 8. Standard Capacity for a FN509 is 17. Standard Capacity for a SIG P320X is 17. So what's "High Capacity" then? 9? 10? 12? 15? 16? 17? Such.... Utter.... Crap.... The only reason I used the term "Hi-cap" is to define a firearm that could possibly be heavily regulated or outlawed in the near future. i.e. Some jurisdictions outlaw anything over ten rounds. Let's not get caught up in semantics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted September 8, 2019 at 10:47 PM Share Posted September 8, 2019 at 10:47 PM The only reason I used the term "Hi-cap" is to define a firearm that could possibly be heavily regulated or outlawed in the near future. i.e. Some jurisdictions outlaw anything over ten rounds. Let's not get caught up in semantics. The blunt truth is if the antis had their way, even single shot firearms would be deemed 'hi-cap' based on laws already attempted and passed,like those mandating firearms be transported/carried unloaded, NY is proof they are not happy with their pulled out of a hat yesterdays 10 round ban and now have moved to a 7 round ban and the fact they are now going after 'semi-autos' in a push for blanket bans, essentially proves they are currently against anything that autoloads the next round from a magazine of any capacity. So if you want to define a firearm that could possibly be heavily regulated or outlawed in the near future, just use the term 'firearm' because that is what those pushing for bans really want to get banned and will continue to push and probalby get away with if the Supreme Court doesn't grow some and slap down the lower courts for ignoring Heller and McDonald. The sad reality buying a 10 round magazine today doesn't mean it wont' be banned tomorrow, heck in NY buying a 7 round magazine doesn't mean it wont' be banned in the future if they get their way, grandfathering causes are never a gurantee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papa Posted September 8, 2019 at 11:06 PM Share Posted September 8, 2019 at 11:06 PM I think it was Oregon that wanted to have a 5 round limit either last year or early this year. There is no end to to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flynn Posted September 8, 2019 at 11:13 PM Share Posted September 8, 2019 at 11:13 PM I think it was Oregon that wanted to have a 5 round limit either last year or early this year. There is no end to to it. Yep, the proposed law earlier this year limited you to purchasing only 20 rounds a month and limited magazines to 5 rounds max, and if yo believe they will stop at 5 rounds if they get their way you are in denial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carry Posted September 8, 2019 at 11:22 PM Share Posted September 8, 2019 at 11:22 PM Depends on your definition of High capacity....http://www.doodnet.com/images/glockazine.gif He's not throwing the rounds down range as he fires... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriumphRider Posted September 10, 2019 at 03:38 AM Share Posted September 10, 2019 at 03:38 AM What are you promoting with your post? Are you FOR limiting a standard magazine capability, or against it? I'm not attacking you, just looking for claritty.I don't think he's promoting anything. He's pointing out the absurdity of trying to logically define "high capacity" v "standard capacity". That's my exact point. I might NOT be the most PC poster here, but I am pretty sure we are all on the same level of thought. This whole "Standard vs, Hi-capacity" BS is just a leftist talking point, with the endgame of disarming the US. Thing is - When the Gov't starts talking disarmament, THAT is EXACTLY when we NEED to be armed. It is Exactly why the Founders included the 2nd Amendment in the US Constitution. I know I walk the tightrope of being banned here, but I state the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.