Posted 25 September 2019 - 02:47 PM
There are a couple of things in this text that I find intriguing and hopeful. The PDF states clearly that multiple lower courts have not followed the SC prior jurisprudence.
This Court has analyzed and confirmed the scope of this fundamental, individual right on three separate occasions. Heller, 554 U.S. at 625, 627; Mc-Donald, 561 U.S. at 790–91; Caetano, 136 S. Ct. at 1027–28. Yet the lower courts do not follow Heller and its progeny in reviewing firearm bans. (emphasis added)
With so many "lower courts" not following the rulings of those three cases, there is hope that the SC will rule against these infringements.
“We, the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the Constitution.” - - Abraham Lincoln
“Small minds adhere to the letter of the law; great minds dispense Justice.” - - S. C. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
Life member NAHC, Endowment member NRA