Reports I've seen and heard said the nut had full auto and semi-auto arms fitted with bump stocks. Do we know for sure he even used any of the rifles equipped with bump stocks? Or was it just the full auto rifles he used? Comparing bump stocks to other firearms accessories is apples and oranges, IMHO. We've seen the proposed assault weapons ban so many times we've got it pretty much memorized. Pistol grips, flash hiders, detachable mags, barrel shrouds, bayonet lugs....none of which have anything at all with the rate of fire of the rifles they are attached to. We can't say that about bump stocks. They DO change the effective rate of fire, and if, in fact, the turd out west used a bump fire stock, we're gonna have a really hard time defending that particular item.
I don't like compromising on any of this stuff, and for full disclosure I'm a patron NRA member. Given the circumstances of what we think happened out west I think it's gonna be very damaging to our cause to try to defend those stocks.