GuitarJedi Posted April 19, 2012 at 04:24 AM Share Posted April 19, 2012 at 04:24 AM This article is in our favor,but the first comment after responding to the article is just immature at best. Here is another one that just makes me wonder the lack of thought put into the comment below. The first comment is one that is anti from the user Morningpeace. I like the commet after, he really put it to that other guy! lol http://www.mcdonoughvoice.com/news/x876162456/Macomb-man-trying-to-garner-support-for-concealed-carry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gray Peterson Posted April 28, 2012 at 12:09 AM Share Posted April 28, 2012 at 12:09 AM Talk about using scare tactics ! http://www.joycefdn.org/resources/content/7/9/3/documents/Mellman-Concealed-Carry-Memo.pdf Guess asking "firearms" rather than "concealed handguns" or "concealed loaded handguns" would skew it favorably to us, this why it isn't used.... I'm also sure the amount of people of Chicago before the lawsuit who supported the handgun ban were in similar percentages. Good thing the constitution doesn't have a trapdoor provision which overturns a constitutional right for the areas where the majority do not want it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.