Tvandermyde

does someone have a link to the filings? Todd

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/OpinionsWeb/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2024/D04-08/C:23-3000:J:Easterbrook:aut:T:fnOp:N:3192599:S:0

it is most likely a Corp thing due to the ghost gun stuff or the ability to turn it into a prohibited item under the parts ban in the PICA.

Sturmgewehr

steve email or call me todd

He should have said, I'll explain function of the trigger, when you define a woman. . . Amy is coming home today so I will be busy but will try to get a video out. But I should have argued it I would have done better

they did this in California goal is to minimize the number of instructors to make it harder and more expensive to get a carry permit

Orals today. I think they went well as my guess is they remand saying GSL-1 is not good law. https://www.illinoiscourts.gov/courts/appellate-court/oral-argument-audio/#audioModal

wrong case. As i recall it was from southern Illinois, and it was about revoking FOID cards due to a charge not a conviction and the judge issued an order

1 The same district court applied the same reasoning to reach the same conclusion in six other matters, in which the government has filed notices of appeal. See United States v. Kevin Delaney, No. 23-3156; United States v. Malik Daniel, No. 23-3173; United States v. Devon Freeman, No. 23-3186; United States v. Christopher SalmeNegrete, No. 23-3212; United States v. Johnny Anderson, No. 23-3217; and United States v. Jose Diaz, No. 23-3259. In each of these matters, the government will soon file unopposed motions to stay the appeal pending a decision by this Court in Prince.

wasn't there a case from an Illinois court telling State Police they could not revoke FOIDS for felony indictment as that is not a conviction and innocent until proven guilty?