steveTA84 Posted January 13, 2020 at 04:18 PM Share Posted January 13, 2020 at 04:18 PM I don't understand why this entire law has not yet been challenged due to Pritzker signing it and a previous General Assembly passing it.Good question....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly B. Posted January 13, 2020 at 04:21 PM Author Share Posted January 13, 2020 at 04:21 PM I don't understand why this entire law has not yet been challenged due to Pritzker signing it and a previous General Assembly passing it.Good question....... The ISRA filed a lawsuit right after the Gov. signed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted January 13, 2020 at 04:29 PM Share Posted January 13, 2020 at 04:29 PM I don't understand why this entire law has not yet been challenged due to Pritzker signing it and a previous General Assembly passing it. Good question....... The ISRA filed a lawsuit right after the Gov. signed it.1. Good. 2. Still ongoing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mab22 Posted January 14, 2020 at 03:27 AM Share Posted January 14, 2020 at 03:27 AM I don't think the Gun Registry showed up until the actual rules came out. I would think that the registry is a new issue....No word from ISRA about it, or any other group that I am aware of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lockman Posted January 14, 2020 at 01:11 PM Share Posted January 14, 2020 at 01:11 PM So the state compels every dealer to maintain a digital registry containing all the information about the firearm, purchase and purchaser. This database is accessible by law-enforcement without a warrant 24/7. The only way I see this is the state has set up gun registration in addition to owner registration. But instead of the state maintaining a database, they are compelling private businesses and individuals to maintain their database for them at the cost and expense of those private individuals. This places firearm dealers in compliance with state law in a position of cooperation with the state in the deprivation of civil rights against gun owners. Sounds like a very insidious form of divide and conquer doctrine. ^ this *** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted January 14, 2020 at 02:46 PM Share Posted January 14, 2020 at 02:46 PM File a lawsuit as a violation of federal law per the 1986 gun owners protection act No such rule or regulation prescribed [by the Attorney General] after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or disposition be established. Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary's authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation.Case closed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilguy Posted January 14, 2020 at 03:23 PM Share Posted January 14, 2020 at 03:23 PM Weed is a controlled substance at the federal level and just another party favor in Illinois. Don’t bet the farm on your assumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted January 14, 2020 at 04:37 PM Share Posted January 14, 2020 at 04:37 PM On 12/19/19, per the ISRA ...On Tuesday, the ISRA was in Sangamon County Court arguing against the Gun Dealer Licensing Certification Act. The judge has continued the case until January 30, 2020.... case 2019-ch-000253 http://records.sangamoncountycircuitclerk.org/sccc/CaseNumberSearch.sc 12/23/2019 Entry on Motion Hearing Dec 17, 2019 Cause Called for Petition for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Dismiss. Present the Plaintiff by Attorney DAVID SIGALE. Present the Defendant by Attorney SUNIIL BHAVE. Arguments heard on all pending matters. Parties given until 1-31-20 to submit proposed orders and supplemental written argument by agreement. CLERK DIRECTED TO SEND COPY OF THIS DOCKET ENTRY TO PARTIES OF RECORD. Judge: GAB Reporter: TH Clerk: DM Proof of Service Dec 17, 2019 Sent Plaintiff's Attorney: DAVID SIGALE Defendant's Attorney: SUNIL BHAVE I don't understand why this entire law has not yet been challenged due to Pritzker signing it and a previous General Assembly passing it.Good question.......The ISRA filed a lawsuit right after the Gov. signed it.1. Good. 2. Still ongoing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted February 1, 2020 at 07:33 PM Share Posted February 1, 2020 at 07:33 PM I assume we could be hearing something on this soon as they had until the 31st? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InterestedBystander Posted February 4, 2020 at 10:06 PM Share Posted February 4, 2020 at 10:06 PM 01/31/2020 Notice of Filing Filed by Defendant and Attorney: KWAME RAOUL & SUNIL BHAVE Brief - Supplemental Brief Filed by Defendant and Attorney: KWAME RAOUL & SUNIL BHAVE Exhibit A Filed by Defendant and Attorney: KWAME RAOUL & SUNIL BHAVE Proposed Order Feb 3, 2020 Printed for Judge's Review Judge: GAB Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Filed by Plaintiff and Attorney: BFF FIREARMS, LLC & DAVID SIGALE Exhibit A - Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Filed by Plaintiff and Attorney: BFF FIREARMS, LLC & DAVID SIGALE Exhibit B= Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint Filed by Plaintiff and Attorney: BFF FIREARMS, LLC & DAVID SIGALE Supplemental Brief Plaintiff: BFF FIREARMS, LLC Proposed Order Feb 3, 2020 Printed for Judge's Review Judge: GAB Notice of Filing (Supplemental Brief, Motion to File Amended Complaint Filed by Plaintiff and Attorney: BFF FIREARMS, LLC & DAVID SIGALE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.