Euler Posted November 28, 2019 at 05:27 AM Share Posted November 28, 2019 at 05:27 AM It's not a 2A case, but it has broad implications that could easily include 2A cases. Wall Street Journal (A subscription - which I don't have - is required to access the full WSJ article.) The Supreme Court didn't issue a landmark decision Monday, but it did shoot off a couple of flares. Notably, the Court rebuked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for again flouting its precedents ... Thompson filed a petition for certiorari in a case involving limitations on political contributions in Alaska. On Monday, the Supreme Court granted the cert petition. ... Applying Circuit precedent, the Ninth Circuit ... declined to apply our precedent ... In light of all the foregoing, the petition for certiorari is granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded for that court to revisit ... our ... precedents. So SCOTUS vacated the CA9 decision for not adhering to SCOTUS precedent. But rather than hear the case themselves, they sent it back to CA9 to do over. Also, the order appears to have been issued 8-0. Ginsburg issued a separate opinion neither in favor nor opposed to remand, noting that the Alaska law only had some of the elements to fit the precedent exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicagoRonin70 Posted November 28, 2019 at 06:56 AM Share Posted November 28, 2019 at 06:56 AM · Hidden by Lou, November 28, 2019 at 03:47 PM - No reason given Hidden by Lou, November 28, 2019 at 03:47 PM - No reason given Delete Link to comment
ChicagoRonin70 Posted November 28, 2019 at 06:57 AM Share Posted November 28, 2019 at 06:57 AM Is there a way to sanction the 9th for their continual malfeasance of this sort, ignoring precedent (especially where anything related to firearms is in ilved)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euler Posted November 28, 2019 at 07:18 AM Author Share Posted November 28, 2019 at 07:18 AM Is there a way to sanction the 9th for their continual malfeasance of this sort, ignoring precedent (especially where anything related to firearms is in ilved)? Federal judges can be impeached. That's about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plinkermostly Posted November 28, 2019 at 02:13 PM Share Posted November 28, 2019 at 02:13 PM IANAL -- seems a number of way more knowledgeable folks here have mentioned that most judges do not like having their hands slapped by upper courts for ignoring rulings. CA 9 has been doing it a lot. Maybe there is hope here that they will see the light on 2A cases. Maybe. Shall not be infringed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lou Posted November 28, 2019 at 03:56 PM Share Posted November 28, 2019 at 03:56 PM Is there a way to sanction the 9th for their continual malfeasance of this sort, ignoring precedent (especially where anything related to firearms is in ilved)? It is in the process of being corrected. Openings on the district courts for the past three years are being filled with judges that respect the Constitution and precedent. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/ninth-circuit-close-to-having-more-trump-judges-than-any-other “Daniel Bress would be Donald Trump’s seventh appointee to the California-based court Trump gets closer to flipping the Ninth Circuit with each new appointment The nation’s largest appeals court could as early as this week have more judges appointed by President Donald Trump than any other federal circuit. Kirkland & Ellis partner Daniel Bress is poised to become the seventh Trump selection to join the San Francisco-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which the chief executive has castigated for being liberal and for ruling against his immigration and other policies.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bitter Clinger Posted November 29, 2019 at 04:45 PM Share Posted November 29, 2019 at 04:45 PM Hopefully, Trump will get another 4 years so he can continue to appoint judges to the CA9.Wouldn't that be something if he flipped the majority? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.