Jump to content

Rep. Dan Crenshaw, everyone


steveTA84

Recommended Posts

13E8kEM.png

 

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/photo-evidence-dan-crenshaw-pushed-red-flags-after-meeting-with-bloomberg-gun-control-activists/

 

Dan Crenshaws recent flirtation with red flag gun confiscation laws might not be so coincidental after all.

 

BLP reported on Crenshaws advocacy for pre-crime legislation such red flag laws and The Threat Assessment, Prevention, and Safety (TAPS) Act following the El Paso and Dayton shootings.

 

Now photo evidence has emerged of Crenshaw previously meeting with the staunchly anti-gun organization Moms Demand Action to discuss red flag laws and universal background checks legislation back in February.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is Dan Crenshaw on Louder with Crowder (post red flag tweet). He discusses:

 

- Why the AR-15 is the ideal home defense tool

- What the TAPS Act does (gives $ to local law enforcement for threat assessment)

- Red Flag Laws

 

The discussion on Red Flag Laws is really interesting. Steven Crowder asks tough questions which Crenshaw doesn’t dodge. He does make several good points, among them is the fact that there is a conversation that needs to be had about RFL. Conservatives need to be involved in that conversation to ensure that any law includes clear language that safe guards due process and protects against abuse. You should listen, it starts at the 42:00 min mark.

 

To be clear, I don’t support red flag laws.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://youtu.be/m_EeFzR_yAA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He does make several good points, among them is the fact that there is a conversation that needs to be had about RFL. Conservatives need to be involved in that conversation to ensure that any law includes clear language that safe guards due process and protects against abuse.

Vid summarized as:

-Supports and coauthor's TAPS to allow local law enforcement the same "analytics" (spying) tools as federal agencies

-"we monopolize the use of force as a government to prevent injustice"

-doesn't admit that suppressed PDW's are the best home defense weapon but SBR and silencer laws make them difficult for everyone's grandma to own (reference to the video).

-says red flag laws fill the "information gap" between felons purchasing guns and law breakers possessing guns, but glazes over that there's already laws against that

-when Crowder points out the due process violation, he goes back to this "information gap" platitude. Vaguely touches on what a red flag is, property confiscation without a crime committed or enough threat of harm to baker act someone.

-"where we don't want to arrest someone and take away their liberty" but still want to take their guns for a vague threat that can't be prosecuted as a criminal threat.

-calls to pass a law to violate due process without violating due process

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13E8kEM.png

 

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/photo-evidence-dan-crenshaw-pushed-red-flags-after-meeting-with-bloomberg-gun-control-activists/

 

Dan Crenshaws recent flirtation with red flag gun confiscation laws might not be so coincidental after all.

 

BLP reported on Crenshaws advocacy for pre-crime legislation such red flag laws and The Threat Assessment, Prevention, and Safety (TAPS) Act following the El Paso and Dayton shootings.

 

Now photo evidence has emerged of Crenshaw previously meeting with the staunchly anti-gun organization Moms Demand Action to discuss red flag laws and universal background checks legislation back in February.

 

I wonder how that photo defines the topic of the conversation, or if a conversation was even had.

 

Any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wen you hear the , we need a "conversation", there never is a conversation. It is only a one way street, their street.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

13E8kEM.pnghttps://bigleaguepolitics.com/photo-evidence-dan-crenshaw-pushed-red-flags-after-meeting-with-bloomberg-gun-control-activists/

Dan Crenshaws recent flirtation with red flag gun confiscation laws might not be so coincidental after all.BLP reported on Crenshaws advocacy for pre-crime legislation such red flag laws and The Threat Assessment, Prevention, and Safety (TAPS) Act following the El Paso and Dayton shootings.Now photo evidence has emerged of Crenshaw previously meeting with the staunchly anti-gun organization Moms Demand Action to discuss red flag laws and universal background checks legislation back in February.

I wonder how that photo defines the topic of the conversation, or if a conversation was even had.Any ideas?

Im just providing info on what the article states. Fact is more and more R's are hoping on the gun control bandwagon and that doesnt happen without influence from somewhere

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, I am also in a pic just like that from last winters meeting in Aurora. I would not consider myself to align with any of their opinions concerning the 2A. I’d reserve my judgment until I knew what his position was on the issues. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Well to your point, everyone has been cornered or photo bombed before, but more importantly, it would be interesting for him to confirm and address his apparent recent change of heart. If indeed this is him new way of thinking, or is he inadvertently allowing these Anti's to put words into his mouth, and putting far more into a situation that's factual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

To be fair, I am also in a pic just like that from last winters meeting in Aurora. I would not consider myself to align with any of their opinions concerning the 2A. I’d reserve my judgment until I knew what his position was on the issues. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Well to your point, everyone has been cornered or photo bombed before, but more importantly, it would be interesting for him to confirm and address his apparent recent change of heart. If indeed this is him new way of thinking, or is he inadvertently allowing these Anti's to put words into his mouth, and putting far more into a situation that's factual.

This

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

To be fair, I am also in a pic just like that from last winters meeting in Aurora. I would not consider myself to align with any of their opinions concerning the 2A. I’d reserve my judgment until I knew what his position was on the issues. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well to your point, everyone has been cornered or photo bombed before, but more importantly, it would be interesting for him to confirm and address his apparent recent change of heart. If indeed this is him new way of thinking, or is he inadvertently allowing these Anti's to put words into his mouth, and putting far more into a situation that's factual.

This

 

Agreed and based on most of his past performances my hope is that he shuts the whole thing down and shows that he is still on our side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no evidence whatsoever that suicides can be prevented by removing firearms from the equation. In fact the evidence is overwhelming that gun availability has absolutely no effect on suicide rates, only the method. The US suicide rate is right at the western European average, if firearms availability were a factor we'd expect it to be far higher. And in fact it's far lower than in gun-free Japan. There's an infinite number of ways to commit suicide, and shooting is just one of them.

 

But these RFLs are being sold as a way to prevent suicide, which they have no hope whatsoever of doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still waiting to hear one credible argument where "red flag laws" fill in an "information gap" (quoting Crenshaw's own words) between law abiding gun owner and criminal threat + judicial warrant (where evidence is collected). How do you have due process on anything less, judges already rubber stamp warrants for this stuff.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These red flag laws should be left to the state. We see how these laws are causing issues and questions about our 2a rights and due process. We know that once you give the Left an inch they are taking the whole measuring system.He should probably have a talk with Rubio, see how things went for him on Immigration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...