In Haynes v. US, the Supreme Court effectively ruled that state gun registration schemes are unconstitutional as they violate the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause. Well, unless criminals are exempted from registration requirements. The reasoning is that criminals must register their illegally possessed firearms, which is an explicit acknowledgement of criminal acts. Requiring one to incriminate oneself to comply with the law in question is unconstitutional.
Sent from my VK700 using Tapatalk
I looked at the history of the ruling, and although it doesn't apply to the NFA anymore (due to legislative changes), it still applies at the state level. So why didn't the courts rules in favor of Powell in Powell v. Tompkins?