Jump to content

Meyers vs Schmitz


jmeyers

Recommended Posts

Good luck!

 

Based on a quick read, aside from the fact that you were denied any sort of hearing to state your case for keeping your license (or being able to apply as a non-resident), is one of the goals to "shrink" the state's definition of substantially similar?

 

The main thing that disqualifies most states, at least in the eyes of the ISP, are the mental health reporting requirements... and (IIRC) the thing that disqualifies Florida is that they don't report all voluntary admissions for mental health treatment; they only report voluntary admissions that result from an INvoluntary psych exam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the curious amongst us, are you challenging the "substantially similar" language, or simply the notion that Florida isn't considered substantially similar by the ISP?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its targeting the violations of the Administrative Code a well as the substantially similar wording.

 

There is substantial backing of this suit although I won't name names at the moment and they are the ones that helped word it :)

 

The Lead Attorney, Carl Draper is the best in Illinois when it comes to Administrative Code law, most notable case was against IDOT for firing 16 workers due to republican affiliation (Whitlow vs. The Illinois Department of Transportation)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...