Jump to content

Gun free zones roll out a red carpet for mass murderers. It's time to roll it up.


Thomas Paine

Recommended Posts

From schools to theaters to waffle houses, the lunacy has to stop. Every journey starts with a first step. Why not give this one a chance to go viral on the whitehouse.gov website?




It can't go viral until it reaches the 150 signatures needed for it to be seen by the general public. If you're reading this and not doing what you can to push the solution, you're part of the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know those petitions were just a propaganda tool for the Obama administration right ? They made up a problem in the form of a question and then pretended to solve it.

The problems they solved shockingly (or maybe not so much) always coincided with their political agenda. Always. It was just a way to give the masses of useful idiots an illusion of a peoples government while they spent their days trying to destroy America.

 

 

And anyways that kinda law would need Congress to pass it. Trump deosn't really have many friends these days up on capitol hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Obama invented the hammer, would you refuse to use it? Trump will sign legislation like this if we put the pressure on Congress to pass it. But, we'll never know what will happen until it breaks through the 150 barrier with legitimate email addresses so the votes can be confirmed.


It's a miracle that we haven't yet had a terrorist attack on a school here. They can see the red carpet. I signed the petition because I don't want blood on may hands the next time a kid is killed in a school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Molly B., December 12, 2018 at 04:25 PM - No reason given
Hidden by Molly B., December 12, 2018 at 04:25 PM - No reason given

You know those petitions were just a propaganda tool for the Obama administration right ? They made up a problem in the form of a question and then pretended to solve it.

The problems they solved shockingly (or maybe not so much) always coincided with their political agenda. Always. It was just a way to give the masses of useful idiots an illusion of a peoples government while they spent their days trying to destroy America.

 

 

And anyways that kinda law would need Congress to pass it. Trump deosn't really have many friends these days up on capitol hill.

This. Ignore these White House petitions. They where only for the Obama administration. Trump’s team isn’t doing anything with them

Link to comment

They don't have to figure anything out. A common sense solution will be staring them in the face if we make them look at it. If you have a better idea, let's have it. Otherwise, don't throw a monkey wrench into this one.[/size]

 

I would be happy if some victims won a few lawsuits against Pulse, MGM, and Marjorie Stoneman.

 

The aurora theater lawsuit was a travesty

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-batman-shooting-lawsuit-20160822-snap-story.html

 

It's rediculous the leftist logic that believes its bad legal precedence to sue a facility that provides inadequate security

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/audience/george-diaz/os-pulse-lawsuit-shooting-victims-20180611-story.html

 

But suing gun manufacturers for misuse is good legal precedence

https://www.revealnews.org/article/3-lawsuits-attempt-to-hold-gun-makers-sellers-liable-for-shootings/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, two of the 3 suits referenced are suing stores, alleging illegal sale of a firearm, then used in murder. Those, are not too dangerous. They actually, IF proven are allowed by law. The other against Bushmaster is very dangerous, since it hasn't been struck down as against The Lawful Commerce in Arms Act already. AMong other things it is trying to make it a public record that AR-15s are "military weapon, “engineered to deliver maximum carnage with extreme efficiency,” and that its design features “exceptional muzzle velocity, the ability to accommodate large-capacity magazines, and effective rapid fire.”" and that "gun maker and seller should have known that people unfit to operate the weapons would gain access to them. In particular, the families say, Bushmaster should have known of the “unreasonably high risk” that the rifle would be used in a mass shooting.". I have no idea how it isn't being struck down because of the afore mentioned law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...