Jump to content


Photo

Culp vs Madigan - Lawsuit Filed On Behalf of Non-Residents


  • Please log in to reply
606 replies to this topic

#601 ChicagoZman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 113 posts
  • Joined: 05-September 13

Posted 29 March 2017 - 07:05 PM

I'm with KWC.  She should have adequate information to come to a decision.  Let's just hope it is the correct one.


NRA Patron/NRA Pistol Instructor
Illinois/Utah Concealed Carry Instructor

Glock Armorer/M&P Armorer

LFI I/LFI II


#602 ChicagoZman

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 113 posts
  • Joined: 05-September 13

Posted 18 April 2017 - 09:09 AM

Any idea on when the judge will issue her decision?


NRA Patron/NRA Pistol Instructor
Illinois/Utah Concealed Carry Instructor

Glock Armorer/M&P Armorer

LFI I/LFI II


#603 kwc

    Member

  • Supporting Members Team
  • 3,103 posts
  • Joined: 17-December 13

Posted 18 April 2017 - 11:01 AM

That's a great question--not sure anyone knows the answer. It could be this week or it could be in July or later. Fingers crossed!
"Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up." - Galations 6:9 (NIV)

"If you can't explain it to a six-year old, you don't understand it yourself." - Albert Einstein (paraphrased)

#604 tkroenlein

    OFFICIAL MEMBER

  • Members
  • 7,705 posts
  • Joined: 12-January 13

Posted 18 April 2017 - 11:39 AM

Judge Myerscough's comments on Moore when it was remanded back to the district were solid gold. Hoping for good things here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

#605 Gamma

    Member

  • Members
  • 2,099 posts
  • Joined: 29-December 13

Posted 18 April 2017 - 01:25 PM

Judge Myerscough's comments on Moore when it was remanded back to the district were solid gold.

I must have missed those. I was under the impression that she was pretty hostile to firearms rights.
Illinois' FCCA is a prime example of the maxim that sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice.

#606 tkroenlein

    OFFICIAL MEMBER

  • Members
  • 7,705 posts
  • Joined: 12-January 13

Posted 18 April 2017 - 02:32 PM

Judge Myerscough's comments on Moore when it was remanded back to the district were solid gold.I must have missed those. I was under the impression that she was pretty hostile to firearms rights.


Skinny did a real good synopsis on it, too.

http://illinoiscarry...showtopic=42076

#607 skinnyb82

    Member

  • Members
  • 5,670 posts
  • Joined: 07-November 12

Posted 18 April 2017 - 05:19 PM

Myerscough wasn't having any of the State's "this case is moot, we're gonna litigate the attorney's fees and expenses" garbage. She point blank stated that the Moore plaintiffs had not obtained the sought after relief. It may have been more of a "OK, so this is what they wanted, this is what they got, nope. Didn't get everything they wanted." It was by the book. She was correct, they sought invalidation of the ban on carriage of stun devices and the FCCA kept the ban on carriage of stun devices. Can't have relief without relief. She also refused to play games with the State, attempting to nickel and dime counsel for the Moore plaintiffs. Then again, all judges are human beings and all humans are biased. To state otherwise would be intellectually dishonest. I can't begin to speculate on how she'll rule but she seems to have little patience for government antics as evidenced by her granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a 1983 false arrest and excessive force case arising out of a Sangamon County Deputy's liberal taser usage (LEO who arrested a woman for no reason, then repeatedly tased her into submission because she asked why she was being arrested, presumably because he believed he had the authority to order anyone to do anything under any circumstance).
NRA Member
SAF Member
C&R License Holder




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users