mab22

So no SWAT team to search and recover the unlicensed deadly item? Or is that just Illinois?

Does the three readings matter anymore? All they have to do is lie and say they did.

Let’s pray they do! Enough with the unelected, unaccountable, bureaucrats making the rules. We pay congress ALOT OF FREAKING MONEY to MAKE laws, not just throw it to some agency.

The real question is, will they ACTUALLY TRY, or will they just "pretend" to fight the ruling? Also, Any odds on the government winning or loosing? I would put money on the defendant winning in some contorted logic that only applies to non citizens. Citizens will need permits for everything, and still can't own semi automatic rifles or shotguns, illegal aliens on the other hand can own Nukes, ICBM's, full auto, etc.

You just need to use the correct browser to get around the Illinois censorship. 🥸

Wish I knew how to get to the documents. Date Entry Judge Entered Under: ACCURACY FIREARMS LLC ET AL 04/04/2024 Copy of Filing Accepted for Report of Proceedings Confirmation Email from Appellate Court in Appellate Case No. 5-24-0112 on file. UNASSIGNED 04/03/2024 Court of Proceedings for 1/3/24 e-filed with Appellate court in case no. 5-24-0112. Copy of Filing Submitted For Report of Proceedings Confirmation Email from Appellate Court in Appellate Case No. 5-24-0112 on file. UNASSIGNED 04/01/2024 Letter with attached order (Appeal in Appellate Court Case No. 5-23-0035 is hereby dismissed as the circuit court has vacated the temporary restraining order) received and filed by the Appellate Court. Letter with attached Mandate (Appellate Court Case No. 5-23-0035 Dismissed per IL Supreme Court Supervisory Order) received and filed by the Appellate Court.

Republicans?

Done.

It appears there is a lot of paperwork being filed and updated in the court record the last few days. from the case page. https://www.judici.com/courts/cases/case_history.jsp?court=IL025015J&ocl=IL025015J,2023MR4,IL025015JL2023MR4D9 Date Entry Judge Entered Under: ACCURACY FIREARMS LLC ET AL 03/27/2024 CLERK NOTE: Received telephone call from Appellate Court stating Volume 2 cannot be accepted based on how was submitted (pages broken out into smaller attachments). Clerk to contact Goodins to assist with breaking down the case into more volumes. Appellate Court to reject the Volume 2 filings and disregard the previous Volumes 1 & 3 there were previously submitted and accepted. Copy of Rejections Confirmations on file. Clerk resubmitted Common Law of Record in 4 volumes. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Volume 1 of 4 Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Volume 2 of 4 Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Volume 3 of 4 Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Volume 4 of 4 Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. UNASSIGNED 03/26/2024 CLERK NOTE: Part of filings for Volume 2 submission failed. Clerk broke down those pages into smaller groups of pages and resubmitted for e-filing to Appellate Court. Clerk telephoned Appellate Court informing of the e-filing submission errors and process of breaking down into attachments consisting of smaller amounts of pages to go through e-filing. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 2501-2800 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 2801-3200 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 6301-6700 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 6701-7200 Email from Appellate Court on file. Letter (stating briefing due dates) filed by the Appellate Court. UNASSIGNED 03/25/2024 Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 1-2200 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 2201-2500 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 3201-4000 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 4001-4800 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 4801-5600 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 5601-6300 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 7201-7500 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 7501-7801 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 7802-8000 Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted for Volume 2 pages 8001-8482 Email from Appellate Court on file. UNASSIGNED 03/22/2024 The record has been prepared and certified through Imaging for transmission to the Appellate Court, Appeal e-filed into Appellate Case# 5-24-0112. Clerk Note: No Transcripts received for filing with Appeal. UNASSIGNED 03/22/2024 Record of Appeal filed with the 5th District Appellate Court. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Volume 1 Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Volume 3 Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Impounded Record Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Report of Proceedings Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. Copy of Filing Submitted & Filing Accepted For Exhibits Confirmation Email from Appellate Court on file. CLERK NOTE: E-filing Submission failed for submitting Volume 2. Clerk broke down Volume 2 into multiple filings and submitted to Appellate Court on 325/24.

Ok Democrat Dan Caulkins.

Correct me if I am wrong, This ruling "applies to the individual", not everyone is what I hear. I don't know that we can even go to a federal court and point to or cite this case. I would bet our challenge gets thrown out as "we are citizens, they are not, go pound sand plebs!" We also need to see if the state appeals and what the result of the appeal is, even then I would put money on your a citizen they are not, you loose go ______ ! I F A N Y T H I N G were to be challenged I would suspect that it would have to be FOID and the CCL, and PICA and the whole system they have in place. I would hope the groups would challenge EVERYTHING and not just FOID. Either way don't get your hopes up folks, history has shown us the level of corruption we live with.

Don’t get excited, hold your breath, or bet your life savings on this. Just saying.

Can anyone find out about the appeal that was filed in Illinois for this case, there is an appeal filed 5-24-0112. That is all that is in the current case, and I’m do not know how to get the details on the appeal or when it’s supposed to be heard. Thanks!

They are trying to change that with PICA... 😉You may want to rephrase that.

This administration isn’t exactly “the sharp tool” in the shed, yes I said sharp, not sharpest.