Jump to content

IL CCL and FOID number by county - Feb. 2019


Molly B.

Recommended Posts

 

 

I am surprised Cook laggs so far behind counties like Lake and Madison in terms of total CCL's. I think gun owners are just fleeing to the collar counties.

?

 

 

Cook total CCL 94,779

Lake total CCL 13,800

Madison CCL 11,808

 

Cook has almost 1/3 of the 325k CCLs.

 

 

 

My eyes are not what they used to be, thought that was 138,000 in lake.

 

Odd to see Cook with 1/3 of the CCL's and only 25% of the FOIDS though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

325,187 CCLs 5 years after they started issuing them. In every study that was being done on this, the predictive models pointed towards it leveling off at around 250K, or about 2 percent of the total population, right around this time, due to economic limitations and CCL holders dying or moving out of the state (which I can see is likely to be a trend with the forthcoming vomit of idiotic gun-control laws that are in the works). It pleases me to no end that we've already exceeded that plateau by 30 percent and continuing to grow. It appears that by the end of this year, we might even hit 3 percent of the population if the rate of growth keeps up. That's quite heartening.

 

Even better, right around 18 percent of the population has FOID cards, and I suspect that the vast majority of those are gun rights supporters.

 

Illinois has about 8 million-odd voters, so that's more than 28.5 percent of the registered voters who have FOIDs, and I can't imagine that less than 90 percent of those are opposed to gun control.

 

How can this MASSIVE block of voters be convinced and mobilized to vote for what literally is the most important right they have, and to get out of office those idiots who threaten it? It seems utterly unbelievable that what would likely be one of the two or three largest blocks of voters wouldn't be able to swing the election in a large number of races, including the Governor's race.

 

Or, are they just so scattered among the rest of the population that they are simply diluted too much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know several people in my area have refused to get their CCL until the fee structure becomes more reasonable and affordable, myself included. At one time, my county was the 2nd highest percentage in the state for CCL holders, by county. It'll go up by a good margin if those fees ever become more reasonable for low/fixed income citizens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know several people in my area have refused to get their CCL until the fee structure becomes more reasonable and affordable, myself included. At one time, my county was the 2nd highest percentage in the state for CCL holders, by county. It'll go up by a good margin if those fees ever become more reasonable for low/fixed income citizens.

 

I guess it's time for a gofundme to pay lawyers to sue the state over "poll tax" there is on our constitutional right to carry a firearm, those most needing can't afford it. I've been harping for 5 years this is complete BS. I can afford the license but I can't afford the lawyer(s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always figured the Public Transportation ban was the biggest crimp in someone getting a CCL, especially in Cook and the collar counties. So many people take train and bus to work while using PT just to get around the city every day, why would anyone put out that kind of money and for all practical purposes, never be able to carry? If and when that ban ever gets shot down, I think you would see a new rush to get a CCL.

 

Edited to add

 

I just ran a few quick numbers. I fully expected Cook to be at the bottom of this list. It would seem more Cook FOID holders have CCLs than the other randomly picked Counties. So, maybe the PT ban isn't as much of a deterrent as I thought - though without the PT ban, the numbers could still be higher.

 

53313405_2489925477703710_42948820838488

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Molly, is there any way to get explanations of the revocation numbers, i.e. how many are revoked for no longer being residents of Illinois?

 

Are they smart enough to make allowances for revocations for people who have left the state, as opposed for revocations due to crimes, mental health etc?

 

I ask this in the hopes that you have a source (that got you this data) that can shed light upon the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Molly, is there any way to get explanations of the revocation numbers, i.e. how many are revoked for no longer being residents of Illinois?

 

Are they smart enough to make allowances for revocations for people who have left the state, as opposed for revocations due to crimes, mental health etc?

 

I ask this in the hopes that you have a source (that got you this data) that can shed light upon the question.

Assuming they have the data, it might be available via FOIA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Percentages... by county.

 

CCL holders/FOID holders

 

15.75 Cook

13.20 Lake

16.70 Madison

13.92 DuPage

 

I'd guess that in the Chicago portion of Cook, there is a higher CCL/FOID % than the rest of Cook... but I'm really just guessing from looking at Lake and DuPage percentages. I could be wrong.

I was looking at some of the CCL numbers for Southern Illinois counties and I wonder if Pope county has the highest percentage of people with FOIDs and CCLs. It looks like about 41% of the population

has a FOID card and 6.7% of the population has a CCL and about 16% of FOID card holders also have a CCL. Pope has a small population

so the number of CCLs is only 287.

 

Does anyone's county have a higher percentage of CCLs? I imagine the fact that there is no carry allowed on public transportation and in restaurants, with liquor licenses in Chicago and lack of ranges in the city

has an effect on the COOK county numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the numbers of CCL and FOID owners available to the public? Shouldn't it be confidential information that's only available to the police?

 

The numbers are available, but the information on who the owners are should not be. It's good for the cause for the public to be aware of just how many people support and use firearms; it shows that it's a large amount of people, not just a scattered few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Percentages... by county.

 

CCL holders/FOID holders

 

15.75 Cook

13.20 Lake

16.70 Madison

13.92 DuPage

 

I'd guess that in the Chicago portion of Cook, there is a higher CCL/FOID % than the rest of Cook... but I'm really just guessing from looking at Lake and DuPage percentages. I could be wrong.

 

Does anyone's county have a higher percentage of CCLs? I imagine the fact that there is no carry allowed on public transportation and in restaurants, with liquor licenses in Chicago and lack of ranges in the city

has an effect on the COOK county numbers.

 

 

Possibly for some...

There are many denizens of the jungle who never use mass transit. I am but one. This negates any issues with transportation systems, target practice and places we can carry while dining out. If I intend to imbibe while dining, I don't carry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the numbers of CCL and FOID owners available to the public? Shouldn't it be confidential information that's only available to the police?

 

 

FOID and FTIP specific individual information is private and can't be FOIA'd. Dart had language added to the law so the state police could notify a specific county of a revocation notice. He's now asking for the FTIP data, if any, for revocations too.

 

The total amount of FOID's reveals no personal information.

 

I'm unaware if the state has released FTIP totals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Percentages... by county.

 

CCL holders/FOID holders

 

15.75 Cook

13.20 Lake

16.70 Madison

13.92 DuPage

 

I'd guess that in the Chicago portion of Cook, there is a higher CCL/FOID % than the rest of Cook... but I'm really just guessing from looking at Lake and DuPage percentages. I could be wrong.

 

Does anyone's county have a higher percentage of CCLs? I imagine the fact that there is no carry allowed on public transportation and in restaurants, with liquor licenses in Chicago and lack of ranges in the city

has an effect on the COOK county numbers.

 

Possibly for some...

There are many denizens of the jungle who never use mass transit. I am but one. This negates any issues with transportation systems, target practice and places we can carry while dining out. If I intend to imbibe while dining, I don't carry.

 

Won't most Chicago restaurants other than fast food have a liquor license that they get on the condition they post even if less than 50% of their income is from alcohol sales?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Feds release NICS data by total and state totals each month. IL is on the list.

 

https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/nics_firearm_checks_-_month_year_by_state.pdf/view

 

Difficult to read even after enlarging, but NICS know the type of transfer(in yellow)

 

Handgun, Long Gun, Other, Multiple.

 

https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/nics_firearm_checks_-_month_year_by_state_type.pdf/view

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...