steveTA84 Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:44 AM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:44 AM Pic heavy article https://ilwd4cr.home.blog/2019/09/02/why-do-you-need-a-gun-to-protect-the-children/ The anti self-defense legislators and activists are all about protecting the children (so they say), and who wouldnt be? Our children are precious. They are innocent, part of us, and most of all, theyre defenseless. It is our job as parents and adults to protect them at all costs from harm and to guide them until they grow up. As a parent, many of you would die to protect your child if it meant they are safe. Lets take a look at what happened in Tbilisi, Georgia: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobPistol Posted September 3, 2019 at 01:14 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 01:14 PM These same politicians are the ones willing to slaughter 57 million children since 1973 in the name of abortion "freedom". They really hate children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallbore Posted September 3, 2019 at 02:02 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 02:02 PM Recorded history since the discovery of gun powder is much shorter than before. Children were no safer in prior times.Ignorance of history is no justification to promote claiming it's for the children.Just as history and current event shows Marxist "the greater good" touted as for the people/children is bs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WitchDoctor Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:01 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:01 PM Thanks for posting that Steve. Going to forward that to some anti's I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird76Mojo Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:56 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:56 PM Might correct the multiple typos in that article...Woman picks her next target, another child. Parents have have not means to defend themselves.How can anyone honestly say “protect kids, not guns” when a gun with stop a threat against a child in a split second when an emergency arises? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:58 PM Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 04:58 PM Thanks for posting that Steve. Going to forward that to some anti's I know.Please do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted September 3, 2019 at 05:01 PM Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 05:01 PM Might correct the multiple typos in that article...Woman picks her next target, another child. Parents have have not means to defend themselves.[/size]How can anyone honestly say “protect kids, not guns” when a gun with stop a threat against a child in a split second when an emergency arises?[/size]Updated. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveTA84 Posted September 3, 2019 at 05:16 PM Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 05:16 PM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RECarry Posted September 3, 2019 at 11:28 PM Share Posted September 3, 2019 at 11:28 PM Person A can't cope with being a parent right now. Abortion is legal and taxpayer-funded. Person B can't cope with the voices in their head. Shooting up a school is illegal. How is Person A different from Person B, from the childrens' perspective? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TriumphRider Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:06 AM Share Posted September 4, 2019 at 03:06 AM I think of the children ever day when I arm up. NO, I am no Rambo (as the anti's like to state), my main idea is to get myself home safely at the end of the day. BUT - If I have the opportunity to remove an active shooter from the breathing population, I will do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.