steveTA84 Posted May 4, 2020 at 01:51 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 01:51 PM https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-supreme-court-relists-all-10-second-amendment-cases-considered-in-fridays-conference/amp/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=buffer&utm_term=ttagfeed&utm_campaign=ttagfeed&__twitter_impression=true A number of Second Amendment cases 10 in all have been in suspended animation for months. Cases involving everything from may issue to banning assault weapons to interstate sales have been at the Supreme Court for consideration some for years and have been punted along, most likely awaiting a resolution in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raw Power Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:12 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:12 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-supreme-court-relists-all-10-second-amendment-cases-considered-in-fridays-conference/amp/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=buffer&utm_term=ttagfeed&utm_campaign=ttagfeed&__twitter_impression=true A number of Second Amendment cases 10 in all have been in suspended animation for months. Cases involving everything from may issue to banning assault weapons to interstate sales have been at the Supreme Court for consideration some for years and have been punted along, most likely awaiting a resolution in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York case. I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. Link to comment
BobPistol Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:27 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:27 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Another case of the maxim of our "two party system" We have one party guaranteed to do evil. The other party does nothing about it. Link to comment
Jeffrey Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:29 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:29 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 4, 2020 at 03:39 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 4, 2020 at 03:39 PM - No reason given https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-supreme-court-relists-all-10-second-amendment-cases-considered-in-fridays-conference/amp/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=buffer&utm_term=ttagfeed&utm_campaign=ttagfeed&__twitter_impression=true A number of Second Amendment cases 10 in all have been in suspended animation for months. Cases involving everything from may issue to banning assault weapons to interstate sales have been at the Supreme Court for consideration some for years and have been punted along, most likely awaiting a resolution in the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. City of New York case. I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. Because the other option would have been much better. Link to comment
Quiet Observer Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:42 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:42 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 4, 2020 at 03:39 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 4, 2020 at 03:39 PM - No reason given https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-supreme-court-relists-all-10-second-amendment-cases-considered-in-fridays-conference/amp/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=buffer&utm_term=ttagfeed&utm_campaign=ttagfeed&__twitter_impression=tru I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. Because the other option would have been much better. Purple noted. Right, Hillary's appointments would have shot us down. Link to comment
mab22 Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:57 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 02:57 PM Further down it states "This morning, the Court’s order list was released…and didn’t mention any of the cases. The Justices have relisted all 10 of the Second Amendment cases, meaning the Court can take them up at some time down the road." I read that as they can take them up in the future, what did I miss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raw Power Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:13 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:13 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 4, 2020 at 03:39 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 4, 2020 at 03:39 PM - No reason given https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/breaking-supreme-court-relists-all-10-second-amendment-cases-considered-in-fridays-conference/amp/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=buffer&utm_term=ttagfeed&utm_campaign=ttagfeed&__twitter_impression=true I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. Because the other option would have been much better. With all this talk about "fear" lately, I'm wondering if the fear-peddling is the only thing that the Donald has going for him.He certainly doesn't have a solid 2A track record. Link to comment
Molly B. Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:38 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:38 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. R.P. Let's please keep on topic. Link to comment
Molly B. Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:40 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:40 PM The cases were not denied, they can still be considered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cybermgk Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:54 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 03:54 PM I suspet the SCOTUS is expecting a few State overreach cases do to these COVID edicts, and wants some room to take them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raw Power Posted May 4, 2020 at 05:17 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 05:17 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. R.P. Let's please keep on topic. Will do. Link to comment
steveTA84 Posted May 4, 2020 at 05:52 PM Author Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 05:52 PM Further down it states "This morning, the Court’s order list was released…and didn’t mention any of the cases. The Justices have relisted all 10 of the Second Amendment cases, meaning the Court can take them up at some time down the road." I read that as they can take them up in the future, what did I miss?That it won’t be immediate like some suspected Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benbow Posted May 4, 2020 at 06:07 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 06:07 PM Sounds to me like they didn't "punt" anything. A DENIAL would be a punt. This means they still can and have to do something with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragsbo Posted May 4, 2020 at 06:22 PM Share Posted May 4, 2020 at 06:22 PM It is beyond frustrating when the court will not take these cases and do something about all the abuses. One could start thinking "they" don't want to uphold the 2nd, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mostholycerebus Posted May 5, 2020 at 04:17 AM Share Posted May 5, 2020 at 04:17 AM Possibly good news, they want to wait until RBG is replaced with a conservative? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soutsidr Posted May 5, 2020 at 05:33 AM Share Posted May 5, 2020 at 05:33 AM I think that Roberts is trying to keep the court's image as if it were just barely right of center. He knows the outcome of decisions that haven't been released yet and I suspect that if there is a big conservative win, he will temper it with minor liberal victories. Once the dust settles from this year's decisions he will let next year take form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
press1280 Posted May 5, 2020 at 04:36 PM Share Posted May 5, 2020 at 04:36 PM As of this moment none have officially been relisted.It’s early though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chislinger Posted May 6, 2020 at 12:52 AM Share Posted May 6, 2020 at 12:52 AM If they're not denied they're still active. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druid Posted May 6, 2020 at 03:06 PM Share Posted May 6, 2020 at 03:06 PM SCOTUS has ten 2A cases to sort through. Not surprised they want more time to go over them before making a decision on which one(s) they want to grant cert. Relist is not a bad thing. From scotusblog: Question: What does it mean for the Court to relist a case? Answer: When a case is “relisted,” that means that it is set for reconsideration at the Justices’ next Conference. Unlike a hold, this will show up on the case’s electronic docket. A relist can mean several things, including the fairly straightforward prospect that one or more Justices wants to take a closer look at the case; that one or more Justices is trying to pick up enough votes to grant review (four are needed); that the Justices are writing a summary reversal (that is, a decision that the lower court opinion was so wrong that the Court can decide the case on the merits without briefing or oral argument); or that one or more Justices are writing a dissent from the decision to deny review. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanc Posted May 6, 2020 at 07:38 PM Share Posted May 6, 2020 at 07:38 PM Not knowing how the SCOTUS works...it seems a number of those cases are very similar with there being about 3 themes represented within that group of 10. Would the SCOTUS combine cases into a single decision or select 1 as representative and rule on it with that ruling acting as the guiding rule? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silhouette Posted May 6, 2020 at 08:22 PM Share Posted May 6, 2020 at 08:22 PM While we should note that SCOTUS can do whatever it wishes (more or less), the typical practice would be to select one case for oral argument and hold the others. Depending on the outcome, all others either would be remanded for further proceedings in a lower court "consistent with the opinion" of the decided case or their petitions would be denied if the outcome doesn't change their probable outcome. In rare cases, cases arguing the same thing (challenging the same law, not similar ones) may be combined if there is good reason. This is relatively rare. It is very common to see cases relisted many times before they decided whether a case is to be heard. At this point in the term, any case accepted would be argued in the fall. We just have to wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChicagoRonin70 Posted May 7, 2020 at 04:26 AM Share Posted May 7, 2020 at 04:26 AM This is relevant to my interest. Reginald J. Shatbox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
press1280 Posted May 7, 2020 at 12:59 PM Share Posted May 7, 2020 at 12:59 PM Not knowing how the SCOTUS works...it seems a number of those cases are very similar with there being about 3 themes represented within that group of 10. Would the SCOTUS combine cases into a single decision or select 1 as representative and rule on it with that ruling acting as the guiding rule?They would likely take 1 case, decide it, and send the rest back to the lower courts with instructions to look at the case just decided. There are 3 NJ carry cases however. Those could possibly be consolidated since it's the same law being challenged.The cases still haven't been relisted as of yet. It's looking like no conference tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vezpa Posted May 7, 2020 at 10:11 PM Share Posted May 7, 2020 at 10:11 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. R.P. Let's please keep on topic. I'm reading this and I can't figure out what is off topic. He is spot on. . Link to comment
chislinger Posted May 8, 2020 at 03:14 AM Share Posted May 8, 2020 at 03:14 AM · Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given I thought Trump's appointments to the supreme court were going to help promote the 2A? That's the entire reason people are telling me that I must support him. R.P. Let's please keep on topic. I'm reading this and I can't figure out what is off topic. He is spot on. . By all accounts Kavanaugh and Gorsuch are pushing for the court to hear 2A cases. I can't figure out what people are complaining about? It's not them who are holding things up. And holy smokes, are there people who actually think Hillary's justices would have fought for the 2A? Link to comment
mrmagloo Posted May 8, 2020 at 06:38 PM Share Posted May 8, 2020 at 06:38 PM · Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given Hidden by Molly B., May 8, 2020 at 07:31 PM - No reason given And holy smokes, are there people who actually think Hillary's justices would have fought for the 2A? That's exactly the logic this guy has been spewing for well over a year. LOL. Link to comment
Silhouette Posted May 11, 2020 at 11:39 PM Share Posted May 11, 2020 at 11:39 PM The 2A cases are now "officially" listed as re-listed for the 5/15 conference on https://certpool.com/conferences/2020-05-15. (I note that this site is unofficial but quite reliable.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druid Posted May 15, 2020 at 05:09 PM Share Posted May 15, 2020 at 05:09 PM Not sure if they are done, but looks like they are Relisting all the 2A cases again for next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silhouette Posted May 15, 2020 at 06:23 PM Share Posted May 15, 2020 at 06:23 PM Orders from this conference will be released on Monday around 9:30am EDT. Occasionally, some orders are released on the day of the conference, but it is not the norm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silhouette Posted May 18, 2020 at 01:39 PM Share Posted May 18, 2020 at 01:39 PM The 2A cases were neither granted nor denied. Presumably they will be relisted again. The next conference is on the 21st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.