Molly B. Posted November 28, 2015 at 10:24 PM Share Posted November 28, 2015 at 10:24 PM I haven't seen this posted and don't remember discussing it recently. Defendant filed a motion entitled “Motion To Declare TheSentencing Penalties Under 720 ILCS 5/24-1.6 Unconstitutional. IL Supreme Court concluded that the offense of AUUW based on the lack of a FOID card and a violation of the FOID Card Act do not have identical elements and thus, there can be no proportionate penalty violation.The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions to reinstate the charges against defendant. State vs Juan Williams.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tango7 Posted November 28, 2015 at 11:14 PM Share Posted November 28, 2015 at 11:14 PM So because he won, he's being recharged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.40carry Posted November 28, 2015 at 11:30 PM Share Posted November 28, 2015 at 11:30 PM So because he won, he's being recharged?The way I read it, the lower court's decision allowing for dismissal of charges was overturned thus the re-charging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2A4Cook Posted November 29, 2015 at 12:34 AM Share Posted November 29, 2015 at 12:34 AM The elements of the So because he won, he's being recharged?He didn't win. He was successful in getting the lower court to DISMISS the charges prior to trial, because the penalties are disproportionate between the FOID Act and the UUW statute, with which he was charged. The argument the court bought was that the elements of both offenses were identical, therefore it was unconstitutional to charge him under the statute with stiffer penalties when the FOID Act violation would carry a lesser sentence. The Supreme Court found that the elements were NOT identical, in that you cannot commit UUW merely by possessing a firearm in your home without possessing a valid FOID (although you COULD be so charged for possessing one in your vehicle, as he was charged). There was no trial, and the state had appealed, so they are entitled (indeed, instructed) to reinstate the charges. I don't agree with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwagila Posted February 15, 2016 at 05:54 PM Share Posted February 15, 2016 at 05:54 PM How would one go about vacating a 2012 AUUW charge without an attorney? I can't afford one. I am an Indiana resident that was passing through and got pulled over while carrying my pistol with an Indiana carry permit. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I lost my Beretta, my car and got locked up in Cook County for 16 days, while I saw gangbangers with the same charge walk on out!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.