Jump to content


Photo

Mance v. Whitaker


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Flynn

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,690 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 18

Posted 26 December 2018 - 10:07 PM

I did a search and didn't come up with any hits for this case

 

https://www.supremec...lic/18-663.html

 

I believe this is a case we need to watch closely, as it could help re-define and clarify many issues in the obviously divided lower courts many of which seem to be totally ignoring the precedent in Heller and McDonald simply because they don't like it or don't accept it.

 

I looked for some summary pieces about the case and this is one of the better ones.

 

https://reason.com/v...ify-second-amen


Anonymous leakers, leak anonymously about the anonymous leak.
 
—Anonymous

#2 Euler

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,720 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 18

Posted 26 December 2018 - 10:30 PM

We have Mance v. Lynch (CA5 Interstate Handgun Transfers).

It's an archived thread, though, so no posts can be added.

I read about it a few months ago. I can't recall where.

EDIT: It might have been Appeals Court Tees Up Interstate Handgun Sale Ban for Possible Supreme Court Review.

Edited by Euler, 26 December 2018 - 10:34 PM.

The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.

- Albert Camus, Resistance, Rebellion, and Death, 1960.


#3 Flynn

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,690 posts
  • Joined: 20-August 18

Posted 26 December 2018 - 11:06 PM

We have Mance v. Lynch (CA5 Interstate Handgun Transfers).

It's an archived thread, though, so no posts can be added.

 

Since it's currently docketed with the Supreme Court, and literally had activity today, a current and new thread is in order because it could pan out to be a huge ruling.


Edited by Flynn, 26 December 2018 - 11:09 PM.

Anonymous leakers, leak anonymously about the anonymous leak.
 
—Anonymous

#4 Euler

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,720 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 18

Posted 10 April 2019 - 06:25 PM

Two Second Amendment cert petitions are to be considered in this Friday's #SCOTUS private conference:

Fredric Russell Mance, Jr., et al v. Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General, et al. – Federal ban on the interstate sale of handguns – The Fifth Circuit denied the petition for rehearing en banc by a vote of 8-7 – Cert petition filed on November 19, 2018. Response due on February 21, 2019. Rescheduled on 3/27/2019. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.

Ivan Pena, et al., v. Stephen Lindley – Cert Filed December 28, 2018. The court of appeals decision upheld the California “safe handgun” roster, loaded chamber indicator, and microstamping. Response due March 6, 2019. DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.

Links to the SCOTUS dockets at the bottom of this page at my website -> https://californiaop...-carry-lawsuit/


The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.

- Albert Camus, Resistance, Rebellion, and Death, 1960.


#5 Euler

    Member

  • Members
  • 1,720 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 18

Posted 10 April 2019 - 06:56 PM

Should we get this thread added to the opening post of Judicial Case Index and Archives, since the Mance v. Lynch (CA5 Interstate Handgun Transfers) thread is archived?

Edited by Euler, 10 April 2019 - 07:04 PM.

The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.

- Albert Camus, Resistance, Rebellion, and Death, 1960.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users