GarandFan Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:10 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:10 AM I've been anticipating that some senator (Thune, perhaps) will offer an amendment for national concealed carry reciprocity to a big, "must-pass" bill. I am just sort of wondering aloud if this could be the one. White House has said it won't veto the measure ... http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/14/politics/congress-defense-bill/index.html
willxjcherokee Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:30 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:30 AM No this is the National Defense Bill, aka national security. The controversy is the new bill allows the military to arrest any citizens without due process, and right to a trial. And all they need is an excuse that the person is a "security risk"
abolt243 Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:39 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:39 AM No this is the National Defense Bill, aka national security. The controversy is the new bill allows the military to arrest any citizens without due process, and right to a trial. And all they need is an excuse that the person is a "security risk" Correct, and it's expected to pass, Obama won't veto it. So, it's a perfect vehicle to tie national reciprocity to. Will be interesting to watch. AB
pyre400 Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:49 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:49 AM According to Rand Paul, and Stewart Rhodes, this NDAA bill is very bad news. I've not had the time to read through it all myself, but they bring up some interesting arguments. http://oathkeepers.o...merican-people/
howie Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:13 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:13 AM Seven days worth of food? Watertight ammo storage? Who comes up with this stuff? I can't understand how people who think they're so smart, could really be so very, very stupid.
willxjcherokee Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:35 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:35 AM No this is the National Defense Bill, aka national security. The controversy is the new bill allows the military to arrest any citizens without due process, and right to a trial. And all they need is an excuse that the person is a "security risk" Correct, and it's expected to pass, Obama won't veto it. So, it's a perfect vehicle to tie national reciprocity to. Will be interesting to watch. ABHow is the military being allowed to arrest citizens a good thing...Oh look abolt is a terrorist, tomorrow the national guard come to get you.Its like the communist list....
202s Posted December 15, 2011 at 04:21 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 04:21 AM This bill is so bad I wouldn't take it in exchange for national RTC. It takes walking on our rights to an entire new level.
SFC Stu Posted December 15, 2011 at 05:22 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 05:22 AM According to Rand Paul, and Stewart Rhodes, this NDAA bill is very bad news. I've not had the time to read through it all myself, but they bring up some interesting arguments. http://oathkeepers.o...merican-people/ Senator Rand Paul has a brain. I wonder what the other Congresscritters problem is?
willxjcherokee Posted December 15, 2011 at 05:27 AM Posted December 15, 2011 at 05:27 AM I think this will bring back the idea of communist name calling."Hey Joe just got promoted to senior consultant"Mark -"Oh really, I was suppose to get that job..."Mark -"Hey didn't you hear Joe is a terrorist? He collects guns and ammo""No hes a good man"Mark- "I'm going to go call the authorities" > Joe goes to detention camp for rest of his life.
Lou Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:13 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:13 PM I've been anticipating that some senator (Thune, perhaps) will offer an amendment for national concealed carry reciprocity to a big, "must-pass" bill. I am just sort of wondering aloud if this could be the one. White House has said it won't veto the measure ... http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/14/politics/congress-defense-bill/index.html That is just the type of bill he tried to attach it to 2 years ago. It failed by 2 votes but I think they are there in the Senate now.
gravyboy77 Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:45 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:45 PM This is bad news:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama
Uncle Harley Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:55 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 01:55 PM Seven days worth of food? Watertight ammo storage? Who comes up with this stuff? I can't understand how people who think they're so smart, could really be so very, very stupid. where did you read/ hear this? If it was the video I missed it.....
gravyboy77 Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:04 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:04 PM Seven days worth of food? Watertight ammo storage? Who comes up with this stuff? I can't understand how people who think they're so smart, could really be so very, very stupid. where did you read/ hear this? If it was the video I missed it..... Read the link i posted:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obamaPaul was backed by Senator Dianne Feinstein. "Congress is essentially authorising the indefinite imprisonment of American citizens, without charge," she said. "We are not a nation that locks up its citizens without charge." Paul said there were already strong laws against support for terrorist groups. He noted that the definition of a terrorism suspect under existing legislation was so broad that millions of Americans could fall within it. "There are laws on the books now that characterise who might be a terrorist: someone missing fingers on their hands is a suspect according to the department of justice. Someone who has guns, someone who has ammunition that is weatherproofed, someone who has more than seven days of food in their house can be considered a potential terrorist," Paul said. "If you are suspected because of these activities, do you want the government to have the ability to send you to Guantánamo Bay for indefinite detention?" Under the legislation suspects can be held without trial "until the end of hostilities". They will have the right to appear once a year before a committee that will decide if the detention will continue.
mstrat Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:06 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:06 PM The Federal government has NO AUTHORITY to pass a bill like this. You can tie an amendment to this bill that overturns every gun law on the books, and I will not support it.
mstrat Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:13 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:13 PM By the way... Although I disagree with nearly everything Durbin does, he's coming down on the right side of this one. He (or his staff) wrote, in part: " We must not allow the depravity of our enemies to cause us to abandon our nation’s most fundamental values. Indefinite detention without recourse to legal proceedings is inconsistent with the principles of liberty and the rule of law that underpin our democracy. Recognizing this, the Senate agreed on a compromise amendment, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, that clarifies the language on detainees, excluding United States citizens, lawful resident aliens, and anyone captured or arrested in the United Sates. "..."The Senate and House are currently reconciling the differences between the two versions of the NDAA." (emphasis added).
stm Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:17 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:17 PM The Federal government has NO AUTHORITY to pass a bill like this. You can tie an amendment to this bill that overturns every gun law on the books, and I will not support it.Congress has authority to pass any bill it wants. Whether or not it is constitutional is another question for our friends in black robes. I agree, though. I wouldn't want RTC reciprocity attached to this bill, purely on the principle of the matter. No matter how much we want it, I for one am not willing to sacrifice one freedom for another.
TriumphRider Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:35 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 02:35 PM Looks like the Traitor-In-Chief is going to gladly sign it. Sayy "Bye-Bye" to your freedom. You are considered a Potential Terrorist just for being on this Forum..... http://www.infowars.com/indefinite-detention-bill-heads-to-obamas-desk/
colt-45 Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:05 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:05 PM so i guess when this pass than all gun owners will have to give up there guns in order not to named a terrorist. is there any one doing any thing about this? are we stuck in the dark about this bill. whats the plain here......i can just see Russa and Germany getting ready and waiting for the words, the us is now defenseless.
pyre400 Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:47 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 03:47 PM Even Mtv gets it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lO6yQvODZjI
boog Posted December 15, 2011 at 04:09 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 04:09 PM Maybe this is why Department of Homeland Security has been checkung out my web site.If you have a web site you can go here to setup an account to see where and sometimes who is looking at youhttp://statcounter.com/?PHPSESSID=lpfruelja9l702ah587u4q0oc3Boog
colt-45 Posted December 15, 2011 at 05:06 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 05:06 PM house has approved this bill so now the senate has to and if they don't than it's dead right? or has the senate already passed it to?
TriumphRider Posted December 15, 2011 at 07:20 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 07:20 PM It passed Both the Senate and the House. Here are the voting results..... Republicans Voting 'Aye'Name VotedRep. Sandy Adams [R, FL-24] AyeRep. Robert Aderholt [R, AL-4] AyeRep. Todd Akin [R, MO-2] AyeRep. Rodney Alexander [R, LA-5] AyeRep. Mark Amodei [R, NV-2] AyeRep. Steve Austria [R, OH-7] AyeRep. Spencer Bachus [R, AL-6] AyeRep. Lou Barletta [R, PA-11] AyeRep. Roscoe Bartlett [R, MD-6] AyeRep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6] AyeRep. Charles Bass [R, NH-2] AyeRep. Dan Benishek [R, MI-1] AyeRep. Rick Berg [R, ND-0] AyeRep. Judy Biggert [R, IL-13] AyeRep. Brian Bilbray [R, CA-50] AyeRep. Gus Bilirakis [R, FL-9] AyeRep. Rob Bishop [R, UT-1] AyeRep. Diane Black [R, TN-6] AyeRep. Marsha Blackburn [R, TN-7] AyeRep. Jo Bonner [R, AL-1] AyeRep. Mary Bono Mack [R, CA-45] AyeRep. Charles Boustany [R, LA-7] AyeRep. Kevin Brady [R, TX-8] AyeRep. Mo Brooks [R, AL-5] AyeRep. Paul Broun [R, GA-10] AyeRep. Vern Buchanan [R, FL-13] AyeRep. Ann Marie Buerkle [R, NY-25] AyeRep. Ken Calvert [R, CA-44] AyeRep. David Camp [R, MI-4] AyeRep. Francisco Canseco [R, TX-23] AyeRep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7] AyeRep. Shelley Capito [R, WV-2] AyeRep. John Carter [R, TX-31] AyeRep. Bill Cassidy [R, LA-6] AyeRep. Steven Chabot [R, OH-1] AyeRep. Tom Cole [R, OK-4] AyeRep. Michael Conaway [R, TX-11] AyeRep. Chip Cravaack [R, MN-8] AyeRep. Rick Crawford [R, AR-1] AyeRep. Ander Crenshaw [R, FL-4] AyeRep. John Culberson [R, TX-7] AyeRep. Geoff Davis [R, KY-4] AyeRep. Jeff Denham [R, CA-19] AyeRep. Charles Dent [R, PA-15] AyeRep. Bob Dold [R, IL-10] AyeRep. David Dreier [R, CA-26] AyeRep. Sean Duffy [R, WI-7] AyeRep. Renee Ellmers [R, NC-2] AyeRep. Jo Ann Emerson [R, MO-8] AyeRep. Blake Farenthold [R, TX-27] AyeRep. Stephen Fincher [R, TN-8] AyeRep. Michael Fitzpatrick [R, PA-8] AyeRep. Chuck Fleischmann [R, TN-3] AyeRep. John Fleming [R, LA-4] AyeRep. Bill Flores [R, TX-17] AyeRep. Jeffrey Fortenberry [R, NE-1] AyeRep. Virginia Foxx [R, NC-5] AyeRep. Trent Franks [R, AZ-2] AyeRep. Rodney Frelinghuysen [R, NJ-11] AyeRep. Elton Gallegly [R, CA-24] AyeRep. Cory Gardner [R, CO-4] AyeRep. Jim Gerlach [R, PA-6] AyeRep. Bob Gibbs [R, OH-18] AyeRep. Chris Gibson [R, NY-20] AyeRep. John Gingrey [R, GA-11] AyeRep. Louis Gohmert [R, TX-1] AyeRep. Kay Granger [R, TX-12] AyeRep. Samuel Graves [R, MO-6] AyeRep. Tim Griffin [R, AR-2] AyeRep. Michael Grimm [R, NY-13] AyeRep. Frank Guinta [R, NH-1] AyeRep. Brett Guthrie [R, KY-2] AyeRep. Ralph Hall [R, TX-4] AyeRep. Richard Hanna [R, NY-24] AyeRep. Gregg Harper [R, MS-3] AyeRep. Vicky Hartzler [R, MO-4] AyeRep. Doc Hastings [R, WA-4] AyeRep. Nan Hayworth [R, NY-19] AyeRep. Joe Heck [R, NV-3] AyeRep. Jeb Hensarling [R, TX-5] AyeRep. Walter Herger [R, CA-2] AyeRep. Jaime Herrera Beutler [R, WA-3] AyeRep. Randy Hultgren [R, IL-14] AyeRep. Duncan Hunter [R, CA-52] AyeRep. Darrell Issa [R, CA-49] AyeRep. Lynn Jenkins [R, KS-2] AyeRep. Samuel Johnson [R, TX-3] AyeRep. Bill Johnson [R, OH-6] AyeRep. Jim Jordan [R, OH-4] AyeRep. Mike Kelly [R, PA-3] AyeRep. Steve King [R, IA-5] AyeRep. Peter King [R, NY-3] AyeRep. Jack Kingston [R, GA-1] AyeRep. Adam Kinzinger [R, IL-11] AyeRep. John Kline [R, MN-2] AyeRep. Doug Lamborn [R, CO-5] AyeRep. Leonard Lance [R, NJ-7] AyeRep. Jeff Landry [R, LA-3] AyeRep. James Lankford [R, OK-5] AyeRep. Thomas Latham [R, IA-4] AyeRep. Robert Latta [R, OH-5] AyeRep. Jerry Lewis [R, CA-41] AyeRep. Frank LoBiondo [R, NJ-2] AyeRep. Billy Long [R, MO-7] AyeRep. Frank Lucas [R, OK-3] AyeRep. Blaine Luetkemeyer [R, MO-9] AyeRep. Daniel Lungren [R, CA-3] AyeRep. Donald Manzullo [R, IL-16] AyeRep. Kenny Marchant [R, TX-24] AyeRep. Thomas Marino [R, PA-10] AyeRep. Kevin McCarthy [R, CA-22] AyeRep. Michael McCaul [R, TX-10] AyeRep. Thaddeus McCotter [R, MI-11] AyeRep. Patrick McHenry [R, NC-10] AyeRep. Howard McKeon [R, CA-25] AyeRep. David McKinley [R, WV-1] AyeRep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers [R, WA-5] AyeRep. Patrick Meehan [R, PA-7] AyeRep. John Mica [R, FL-7] AyeRep. Candice Miller [R, MI-10] AyeRep. Gary Miller [R, CA-42] AyeRep. Jeff Miller [R, FL-1] AyeRep. Tim Murphy [R, PA-18] AyeRep. Randy Neugebauer [R, TX-19] AyeRep. Kristi Noem [R, SD-0] AyeRep. Richard Nugent [R, FL-5] AyeRep. Devin Nunes [R, CA-21] AyeRep. Alan Nunnelee [R, MS-1] AyeRep. Pete Olson [R, TX-22] AyeRep. Steven Palazzo [R, MS-4] AyeRep. Erik Paulsen [R, MN-3] AyeRep. Steven Pearce [R, NM-2] AyeRep. Thomas Petri [R, WI-6] AyeRep. Todd Platts [R, PA-19] AyeRep. Ted Poe [R, TX-2] AyeRep. Mike Pompeo [R, KS-4] AyeRep. Tom Price [R, GA-6] AyeRep. Ben Quayle [R, AZ-3] AyeRep. Tom Reed [R, NY-29] AyeRep. Dennis Rehberg [R, MT-0] AyeRep. Dave Reichert [R, WA-8] AyeRep. Jim Renacci [R, OH-16] AyeRep. Scott Rigell [R, VA-2] AyeRep. David Rivera [R, FL-25] AyeRep. Martha Roby [R, AL-2] AyeRep. Michael Rogers [R, MI-8] AyeRep. Harold Rogers [R, KY-5] AyeRep. Michael Rogers [R, AL-3] AyeRep. Thomas Rooney [R, FL-16] AyeRep. Peter Roskam [R, IL-6] AyeRep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R, FL-18] AyeRep. Dennis Ross [R, FL-12] AyeRep. Jon Runyan [R, NJ-3] AyeRep. Paul Ryan [R, WI-1] AyeRep. Steve Scalise [R, LA-1] AyeRep. Robert Schilling [R, IL-17] AyeRep. Jean Schmidt [R, OH-2] AyeRep. Aaron Schock [R, IL-18] AyeRep. Tim Scott [R, SC-1] AyeRep. Austin Scott [R, GA-8] AyeRep. James Sensenbrenner [R, WI-5] AyeRep. Peter Sessions [R, TX-32] AyeRep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19] AyeRep. William Shuster [R, PA-9] AyeRep. Christopher Smith [R, NJ-4] AyeRep. Adrian Smith [R, NE-3] AyeRep. Lamar Smith [R, TX-21] AyeRep. Steve Southerland [R, FL-2] AyeRep. Clifford Stearns [R, FL-6] AyeRep. Steve Stivers [R, OH-15] AyeRep. John Sullivan [R, OK-1] AyeRep. Lee Terry [R, NE-2] AyeRep. Glenn Thompson [R, PA-5] AyeRep. William Thornberry [R, TX-13] AyeRep. Patrick Tiberi [R, OH-12] AyeRep. Robert Turner [R, NY-9] AyeRep. Michael Turner [R, OH-3] AyeRep. Frederick Upton [R, MI-6] AyeRep. Greg Walden [R, OR-2] AyeRep. Daniel Webster [R, FL-8] AyeRep. Allen West [R, FL-22] AyeRep. Lynn Westmoreland [R, GA-3] AyeRep. Edward Whitfield [R, KY-1] AyeRep. Addison Wilson [R, SC-2] AyeRep. Rob Wittman [R, VA-1] AyeRep. Frank Wolf [R, VA-10] AyeRep. Steve Womack [R, AR-3] AyeRep. Kevin Yoder [R, KS-3] AyeRep. Donald Young [R, AK-0] AyeRep. Todd Young [R, IN-9] Aye Democrats Voting 'Aye'Name VotedRep. Gary Ackerman [D, NY-5] AyeRep. Jason Altmire [D, PA-4] AyeRep. Robert Andrews [D, NJ-1] AyeRep. Joe Baca [D, CA-43] AyeRep. John Barrow [D, GA-12] AyeRep. Shelley Berkley [D, NV-1] AyeRep. Howard Berman [D, CA-28] AyeRep. Sanford Bishop [D, GA-2] AyeRep. Timothy Bishop [D, NY-1] AyeRep. Dan Boren [D, OK-2] AyeRep. Leonard Boswell [D, IA-3] AyeRep. Robert Brady [D, PA-1] AyeRep. Corrine Brown [D, FL-3] AyeRep. George Butterfield [D, NC-1] AyeRep. Lois Capps [D, CA-23] AyeRep. Dennis Cardoza [D, CA-18] AyeRep. Russ Carnahan [D, MO-3] AyeRep. John Carney [D, DE-0] AyeRep. Kathy Castor [D, FL-11] AyeRep. Ben Chandler [D, KY-6] AyeRep. David Cicilline [D, RI-1] AyeRep. Gerald Connolly [D, VA-11] AyeRep. Jim Cooper [D, TN-5] AyeRep. Jim Costa [D, CA-20] AyeRep. Joe Courtney [D, CT-2] AyeRep. Mark Critz [D, PA-12] AyeRep. Joseph Crowley [D, NY-7] AyeRep. Henry Cuellar [D, TX-28] AyeRep. Susan Davis [D, CA-53] AyeRep. Ted Deutch [D, FL-19] AyeRep. Norman Dicks [D, WA-6] AyeRep. John Dingell [D, MI-15] AyeRep. Lloyd Doggett [D, TX-25] AyeRep. Joe Donnelly [D, IN-2] AyeRep. Eliot Engel [D, NY-17] AyeRep. John Garamendi [D, CA-10] AyeRep. Charles Gonzalez [D, TX-20] AyeRep. Al Green [D, TX-9] AyeRep. Raymond Green [D, TX-29] AyeRep. Colleen Hanabusa [D, HI-1] AyeRep. Brian Higgins [D, NY-27] AyeRep. James Himes [D, CT-4] AyeRep. Mazie Hirono [D, HI-2] AyeRep. Kathleen Hochul [D, NY-26] AyeRep. Tim Holden [D, PA-17] AyeRep. Steny Hoyer [D, MD-5] AyeRep. Jay Inslee [D, WA-1] AyeRep. Steve Israel [D, NY-2] AyeRep. Sheila Jackson-Lee [D, TX-18] AyeRep. William Keating [D, MA-10] AyeRep. Dale Kildee [D, MI-5] AyeRep. Ronald Kind [D, WI-3] AyeRep. Larry Kissell [D, NC-8] AyeRep. James Langevin [D, RI-2] AyeRep. Rick Larsen [D, WA-2] AyeRep. John Larson [D, CT-1] AyeRep. Sander Levin [D, MI-12] AyeRep. Daniel Lipinski [D, IL-3] AyeRep. David Loebsack [D, IA-2] AyeRep. Nita Lowey [D, NY-18] AyeRep. Jim Matheson [D, UT-2] AyeRep. Carolyn McCarthy [D, NY-4] AyeRep. Mike McIntyre [D, NC-7] AyeRep. Jerry McNerney [D, CA-11] AyeRep. William Owens [D, NY-23] AyeRep. William Pascrell [D, NJ-8] AyeRep. Edward Pastor [D, AZ-4] AyeRep. Nancy Pelosi [D, CA-8] AyeRep. Ed Perlmutter [D, CO-7] AyeRep. Collin Peterson [D, MN-7] AyeRep. Nick Rahall [D, WV-3] AyeRep. Silvestre Reyes [D, TX-16] AyeRep. Laura Richardson [D, CA-37] AyeRep. Mike Ross [D, AR-4] AyeRep. Steven Rothman [D, NJ-9] AyeRep. Dutch Ruppersberger [D, MD-2] AyeRep. Linda Sánchez [D, CA-39] AyeRep. Adam Schiff [D, CA-29] AyeRep. Kurt Schrader [D, OR-5] AyeRep. Allyson Schwartz [D, PA-13] AyeRep. David Scott [D, GA-13] AyeRep. Terri Sewell [D, AL-7] AyeRep. Brad Sherman [D, CA-27] AyeRep. Heath Shuler [D, NC-11] AyeRep. Albio Sires [D, NJ-13] AyeRep. Adam Smith [D, WA-9] AyeRep. Betty Sutton [D, OH-13] AyeRep. Niki Tsongas [D, MA-5] AyeRep. Peter Visclosky [D, IN-1] AyeRep. Timothy Walz [D, MN-1] AyeRep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz [D, FL-20] AyeRep. Henry Waxman [D, CA-30] AyeRep. Frederica Wilson [D, FL-17] Aye Republicans Voting 'Nay'Name VotedRep. Justin Amash [R, MI-3] NayRep. Larry Bucshon [R, IN-8] NayRep. Michael Burgess [R, TX-26] NayRep. Dan Burton [R, IN-5] NayRep. John Campbell [R, CA-48] NayRep. Jason Chaffetz [R, UT-3] NayRep. Mike Coffman [R, CO-6] NayRep. Scott DesJarlais [R, TN-4] NayRep. Jeff Duncan [R, SC-3] NayRep. John Duncan [R, TN-2] NayRep. Jeff Flake [R, AZ-6] NayRep. Randy Forbes [R, VA-4] NayRep. Scott Garrett [R, NJ-5] NayRep. Robert Goodlatte [R, VA-6] NayRep. Paul Gosar [R, AZ-1] NayRep. Trey Gowdy [R, SC-4] NayRep. Tom Graves [R, GA-9] NayRep. Morgan Griffith [R, VA-9] NayRep. Andy Harris [R, MD-1] NayRep. Tim Huelskamp [R, KS-1] NayRep. Bill Huizenga [R, MI-2] NayRep. Robert Hurt [R, VA-5] NayRep. Timothy Johnson [R, IL-15] NayRep. Walter Jones [R, NC-3] NayRep. Raúl Labrador [R, ID-1] NayRep. Cynthia Lummis [R, WY-0] NayRep. Connie Mack [R, FL-14] NayRep. Tom McClintock [R, CA-4] NayRep. Mick Mulvaney [R, SC-5] NayRep. Mike Pence [R, IN-6] NayRep. Bill Posey [R, FL-15] NayRep. Reid Ribble [R, WI-8] NayRep. Phil Roe [R, TN-1] NayRep. Dana Rohrabacher [R, CA-46] NayRep. Todd Rokita [R, IN-4] NayRep. Edward Royce [R, CA-40] NayRep. David Schweikert [R, AZ-5] NayRep. Michael Simpson [R, ID-2] NayRep. Marlin Stutzman [R, IN-3] NayRep. Scott Tipton [R, CO-3] NayRep. Timothy Walberg [R, MI-7] NayRep. Joe Walsh [R, IL-8] NayRep. Rob Woodall [R, GA-7] Nay Democrats Voting 'Nay'Name VotedRep. Tammy Baldwin [D, WI-2] NayRep. Karen Bass [D, CA-33] NayRep. Xavier Becerra [D, CA-31] NayRep. Earl Blumenauer [D, OR-3] NayRep. Bruce Braley [D, IA-1] NayRep. Michael Capuano [D, MA-8] NayRep. André Carson [D, IN-7] NayRep. Judy Chu [D, CA-32] NayRep. Hansen Clarke [D, MI-13] NayRep. Yvette Clarke [D, NY-11] NayRep. William Clay [D, MO-1] NayRep. Emanuel Cleaver [D, MO-5] NayRep. James Clyburn [D, SC-6] NayRep. Steve Cohen [D, TN-9] NayRep. John Conyers [D, MI-14] NayRep. Jerry Costello [D, IL-12] NayRep. Elijah Cummings [D, MD-7] NayRep. Danny Davis [D, IL-7] NayRep. Peter DeFazio [D, OR-4] NayRep. Diana DeGette [D, CO-1] NayRep. Rosa DeLauro [D, CT-3] NayRep. Michael Doyle [D, PA-14] NayRep. Donna Edwards [D, MD-4] NayRep. Keith Ellison [D, MN-5] NayRep. Anna Eshoo [D, CA-14] NayRep. Sam Farr [D, CA-17] NayRep. Chaka Fattah [D, PA-2] NayRep. Barney Frank [D, MA-4] NayRep. Marcia Fudge [D, OH-11] NayRep. Raul Grijalva [D, AZ-7] NayRep. Janice Hahn [D, CA-36] NayRep. Alcee Hastings [D, FL-23] NayRep. Martin Heinrich [D, NM-1] NayRep. Maurice Hinchey [D, NY-22] NayRep. Rubén Hinojosa [D, TX-15] NayRep. Rush Holt [D, NJ-12] NayRep. Michael Honda [D, CA-15] NayRep. Jesse Jackson [D, IL-2] NayRep. Henry Johnson [D, GA-4] NayRep. Marcy Kaptur [D, OH-9] NayRep. Dennis Kucinich [D, OH-10] NayRep. Barbara Lee [D, CA-9] NayRep. John Lewis [D, GA-5] NayRep. Zoe Lofgren [D, CA-16] NayRep. Ben Luján [D, NM-3] NayRep. Carolyn Maloney [D, NY-14] NayRep. Edward Markey [D, MA-7] NayRep. Doris Matsui [D, CA-5] NayRep. Betty McCollum [D, MN-4] NayRep. James McDermott [D, WA-7] NayRep. James McGovern [D, MA-3] NayRep. Gregory Meeks [D, NY-6] NayRep. Michael Michaud [D, ME-2] NayRep. George Miller [D, CA-7] NayRep. Bradley Miller [D, NC-13] NayRep. Gwen Moore [D, WI-4] NayRep. James Moran [D, VA-8] NayRep. Christopher Murphy [D, CT-5] NayRep. Jerrold Nadler [D, NY-8] NayRep. Grace Napolitano [D, CA-38] NayRep. Richard Neal [D, MA-2] NayRep. John Olver [D, MA-1] NayRep. Frank Pallone [D, NJ-6] NayRep. Donald Payne [D, NJ-10] NayRep. Gary Peters [D, MI-9] NayRep. Chellie Pingree [D, ME-1] NayRep. Jared Polis [D, CO-2] NayRep. David Price [D, NC-4] NayRep. Mike Quigley [D, IL-5] NayRep. Charles Rangel [D, NY-15] NayRep. Cedric Richmond [D, LA-2] NayRep. Lucille Roybal-Allard [D, CA-34] NayRep. Bobby Rush [D, IL-1] NayRep. Timothy Ryan [D, OH-17] NayRep. John Sarbanes [D, MD-3] NayRep. Janice Schakowsky [D, IL-9] NayRep. Robert Scott [D, VA-3] NayRep. José Serrano [D, NY-16] NayRep. Louise Slaughter [D, NY-28] NayRep. Jackie Speier [D, CA-12] NayRep. Fortney Stark [D, CA-13] NayRep. Bennie Thompson [D, MS-2] NayRep. Michael Thompson [D, CA-1] NayRep. John Tierney [D, MA-6] NayRep. Paul Tonko [D, NY-21] NayRep. Edolphus Towns [D, NY-10] NayRep. Christopher Van Hollen [D, MD-8] NayRep. Nydia Velázquez [D, NY-12] NayRep. Maxine Waters [D, CA-35] NayRep. Melvin Watt [D, NC-12] NayRep. Peter Welch [D, VT-0] NayRep. Lynn Woolsey [D, CA-6] NayRep. John Yarmuth [D, KY-3] Nay Republicans Voting 'Abstain'Name VotedRep. Michele Bachmann [R, MN-6] AbstainRep. Howard Coble [R, NC-6] AbstainRep. Mario Diaz-Balart [R, FL-21] AbstainRep. Steven LaTourette [R, OH-14] AbstainRep. Sue Myrick [R, NC-9] AbstainRep. Ronald Paul [R, TX-14] AbstainRep. Joseph Pitts [R, PA-16] AbstainRep. Bill Young [R, FL-10] Abstain Democrats Voting 'Abstain'Name VotedRep. Bob Filner [D, CA-51] AbstainRep. Gabrielle Giffords [D, AZ-8] AbstainRep. Luis Gutiérrez [D, IL-4] AbstainRep. Eddie Johnson [D, TX-30] AbstainRep. Stephen Lynch [D, MA-9] AbstainRep. Loretta Sanchez [D, CA-47] Abstain Read more: http://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=851536#ixzz1gdI1RLf2
Uncle Harley Posted December 15, 2011 at 08:54 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 08:54 PM By the way... Although I disagree with nearly everything Durbin does, he's coming down on the right side of this one. He (or his staff) wrote, in part: " We must not allow the depravity of our enemies to cause us to abandon our nation's most fundamental values. Indefinite detention without recourse to legal proceedings is inconsistent with the principles of liberty and the rule of law that underpin our democracy. Recognizing this, the Senate agreed on a compromise amendment, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, that clarifies the language on detainees, excluding United States citizens, lawful resident aliens, and anyone captured or arrested in the United Sates. "..."The Senate and House are currently reconciling the differences between the two versions of the NDAA." (emphasis added). So what does this mean? Have we had a case of chicken little syndrome when all along it hasn't applied to US citizens? Because if it is true that it does not apply to us and only applies to POW's then I'm not apposed at all. It would merely make formal what we have been doing all along.
pyre400 Posted December 15, 2011 at 09:07 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 09:07 PM So what does this mean? Have we had a case of chicken little syndrome when all along it hasn't applied to US citizens? Because if it is true that it does not apply to us and only applies to POW's then I'm not apposed at all. It would merely make formal what we have been doing all along. Stewart provides some analysis and cites text: http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2011/12/01/stewart-rhodes-interview-citizen-detention-act-senate-has-declared-war-on-american-people/
GarandFan Posted December 15, 2011 at 10:04 PM Author Posted December 15, 2011 at 10:04 PM I think that Lou is the only person who understood the point of my post. But anyway ... carry on.
pyre400 Posted December 15, 2011 at 10:12 PM Posted December 15, 2011 at 10:12 PM I think that Lou is the only person who understood the point of my post. But anyway ... carry on. Sorry - I meant no disrespect, GF. I can split the posts that dont directly relate to the reciprocity into another thread if you'd like. ..be more than happy to. ETA: I think I now see your point. Reciprocity would draw an obama veto?
Uncle Harley Posted December 16, 2011 at 03:33 AM Posted December 16, 2011 at 03:33 AM So what does this mean? Have we had a case of chicken little syndrome when all along it hasn't applied to US citizens? Because if it is true that it does not apply to us and only applies to POW's then I'm not apposed at all. It would merely make formal what we have been doing all along. Stewart provides some analysis and cites text: http://oathkeepers.o...merican-people/ From your link There is a great deal of confusion about this bill, with some incorrectly interpreting it as not affecting American citizens. There is also confusion about the very dangerous legal precedents that this bill seeks to codify and bolster So my question is, is this why Obama originally vowed to veto it?, and then From the text I quoted............... "Recognizing this, the Senate agreed on a compromise amendment, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, that clarifies the language on detainees, excluding United States citizens, lawful resident aliens, and anyone captured or arrested in the United Sates. " And now that they agreed on an amendment that makes it CLEAR that ANYONE captured or arrested in the US is exempt that he now lifted his veto threat. I can't belive what I'm about to type, but this may just be the best thing Obama has done his entire time in office. ( threten to veto the bill in it's original format that is)
colt-45 Posted December 16, 2011 at 03:51 AM Posted December 16, 2011 at 03:51 AM So what does this mean? Have we had a case of chicken little syndrome when all along it hasn't applied to US citizens? Because if it is true that it does not apply to us and only applies to POW's then I'm not apposed at all. It would merely make formal what we have been doing all along. Stewart provides some analysis and cites text: http://oathkeepers.o...merican-people/ From your link There is a great deal of confusion about this bill, with some incorrectly interpreting it as not affecting American citizens. There is also confusion about the very dangerous legal precedents that this bill seeks to codify and bolster So my question is, is this why Obama originally vowed to veto it?, and then From the text I quoted............... "Recognizing this, the Senate agreed on a compromise amendment, introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, that clarifies the language on detainees, excluding United States citizens, lawful resident aliens, and anyone captured or arrested in the United Sates. " And now that they agreed on an amendment that makes it CLEAR that ANYONE captured or arrested in the US is exempt that he now lifted his veto threat. I can't belive what I'm about to type, but this may just be the best thing Obama has done his entire time in office. ( threten to veto the bill in it's original format that is)i wish that some one that really know how that bill reads would explain it to all of us. cause i'm getting both we can be and we are excluded from the bill so witch one is it?
Uncle Harley Posted December 16, 2011 at 04:03 AM Posted December 16, 2011 at 04:03 AM i wish that some one that really know how that bill reads would explain it to all of us. cause i'm getting both we can be and we are excluded from the bill so witch one is it? we have to vote on it to see what's in it
pyre400 Posted December 16, 2011 at 04:12 AM Posted December 16, 2011 at 04:12 AM I can't belive what I'm about to type, but this may just be the best thing Obama has done his entire time in office. ( threten to veto the bill in it's original format that is)Some have said its posturing by Obama, and that he may even sign it anyway. i wish that some one that really know how that bill reads would explain it to all of us. cause i'm getting both we can be and we are excluded from the bill so witch one is it? Its both... US citizens are excluded in one section, but another section has wording that gives the president an "option". Stewart covers that in the link I provided. There's a video there too, if you have broadband.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.